Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes, and factors affecting outcomes, following shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Hemiarthroplasty has been applied to treat proximal humeral fracture with variable outcomes. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess factors affecting outcome in patients following hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture (PHF) repair.

Methods

Patients with proximal humeral fractures treated over a 6-year period were included. Indications for hemiarthroplasty were severe three-part fractures associated with osteoporosis; four-part fractures with or without dislocation; splitting of the humeral head, or >45% collapse of the humeral head. Surgery outcome and postoperative complications were main outcome measures in this study.

Results

Thirty-three of 47 patients were included in the final analysis (mean age 64.3 years, range 43–82). Mean postoperative follow-up was 44.4 (range 36–57) months. Postoperative complications (shoulder dislocation, mild shoulder subluxation, heterotopic ossification) occurred in seven patients. Healing of the greater and lesser tubercles was abnormal or poor in 18 patients. These patients had significantly higher pain scores (4.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1) and significantly lower capacities for active lifting (79.3 ± 9.6 vs. 121.7 ± 24.3), external rotation (20.7 ± 3.7 vs. 39.2 ± 10.3), and Neer scores (79.2 ± 5.7 vs. 90.6 ± 3.6) versus patients who exhibited complete healing (all P < 0.001). Patient age, type of surgical approach, and fracture type were not major influencers of outcome.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the healing of the greater and lesser tubercles is the major determinant of outcome following hemiarthroplasty for PHF repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine WN, Connor PM, Yamaguchi K, Self EB, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Orthopedics. 1998;21(1):68–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Compito CA, Self EB, Bigliani LU. Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;307:27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Naranja RJ Jr, Iannotti JP. Displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(6):373–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neer CS 2nd. Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(4):389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1689–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cofield RH. Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;230:49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartsock LA, Estes WJ, Murray CA, Friedman RJ. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Clin North (Am). 1998;29(3):467–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2002;84-A(11):1919–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fallatah S, Dervin GF, Brunet JA, Conway AF, Hrushowy H. Functional outcome after proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2008;51(5):361–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falborg B, Palm H, Fenger AM, Anderson K, Jensen CH. Outcome of cemented Neer II hemiarthroplasty in displaced humeral head fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(1):7–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antuña SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2003;85-A(7):1215–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1982;64(3):319–37.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1970;52(6):1077–89.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schai P, Imhoff A, Preiss S. Comminuted humeral head fractures: a multicenter analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(5):319–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Esser RD. Open reduction and internal fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:244–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Darder A, Darder A Jr, Sanchis V, Gastaldi E, Gomar F. Four-part displaced proximal humeral fractures: operative treatment using Kirschner wires and a tension band. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(6):497–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Molé D. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):401–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frankle MA, Ondrovic LE, Markee BA, Harris ML, Lee WE 3rd. Stability of tuberosity reattachment in proximal humeral hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu YM, Jiang CY, Lu Y, Wang MY, Rong GW, Yu LP, Yao XF, Meng LB. Application of loading and digital measurement apparatus in four-part fracture model of proximal humerus. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2007;9(4):367–71. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bosch U, Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Tscherne H. Outcome after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(5):479–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Norris TR, Green A, McGuigan FX. Late prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(4):271–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhai WT, Zhong B, Jiang Y, Zhang CQ, Fan CY, Shen H, Sui SP, Zeng BF. Factors affecting the outcome of humeral head replacement. Chin J Clin Rehab. 2002;6(22):3388–9. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang F, Xu RM, Zhu WJ, Ma WH. Replacement of humeral head prosthesis for complex fractures of proximal humerus. Orthop Biomech Mater Clin Study. 2005;2(4):37–8. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu F, Tang L, Mao T, Cao Y, Wang YH, Zhao J, Zhu MD, Zhu Y, Chen XD, Cao Y, Wang H. The short term follow-up study of shoulder hemi-arthroplasty. Chin J Orthop. 2005;25(7):390–4. (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial biases to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-hua Li.

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Li, Sh., Cai, Zd. et al. Outcomes, and factors affecting outcomes, following shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture repair. J Orthop Sci 16, 565–572 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0113-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0113-8

Keywords

Navigation