Abstract
Background
Surgical approach to the posterior sole or heel is commonly used for various orthopedic procedures. The objective of this cadaver study was to identify the risks to local neurovascular structures using an approach to the posterior sole or heel and to define the safe zone for minimizing the risk of injury.
Methods
Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver limbs were used. A layered dissection was performed from skin to neurovascular structures. Distances of the entire foot length, the lateral plantar nerve from the heel, the calcaneocuboid joint from the heel, the nerve to abductor digiti minimi from the heel, and the lateral plantar nerve from the calcaneocuboid joint; and depth of the lateral plantar nerve from skin of sole in the midline, and angle of the lateral plantar nerve to the midline axis were measured.
Results
The mean entire foot length was 2,29.1 (range 215–250) mm. Location of the lateral plantar nerve from the heel in the dissecting midline axis was a mean of 93.5 (range 86–104) mm. Calcaneocuboid joint was located at a mean of 75.7 (range 70–85) mm from heel in the midline axis. The nerve to abductor digiti minimi was located at a mean of 48.1 (range 41–55) mm from the heel. Lateral plantar nerve was located at a mean of 19.4 (range 16–23) mm distal to the calcaneocuboid joint in the midline level. The angle at which the lateral plantar nerve crossed the dissecting midline incision was at a mean of 13.8° (range 9–20°).
Conclusions
Based on these results, we defined the safe zone for the surgical approach to the posterior sole as anterior to the nerve to the abductor digiti minimi in the midline axis and posterior to the calcaneocuboid joint. There were no significant neurovascular structures observed in this zone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broudy AS, Scott RD, Watts HG. The split-heel technique in the management of calcaneal osteomyelitis in children. Clin Orthop. 1976;119:202–5.
Gaenslen FJ. Split-heel approach in osteomyelitis of Os Calcis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1931;13:759–72.
Mückley T, Ullm S, Petrovitch A, Klos K, Beimel C, Fröber R, Hofmann GO. Comparison of two intramedullary nails for tibiotalocalcaneal fusion: anatomic and radiographic considerations. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:605–13.
Pochatko DJ, Smith JW, Phillips RA, Prince BD, Hedrick MR. Anatomic structures at risk: combined subtalar and ankle arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary rod. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:542–7.
Wang E, Zhao Q, Zhang L, Ji S, Li J. The split-heel technique in the management of chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;B18:23–7.
Flock TJ, Ishikawa S, Hecht PJ, Wapner KL. Heel anatomy for retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal roddings: a roentgenographic and anatomic analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:233–5.
McGarvey MC, Trevino SG, Baxter DE, Noble PC, Schon LC. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: anatomic and technical considerations. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;19:363–9.
Moorjani N, Buckingham R, Winson I. Optimal insertion site for intramedullary nails during combined ankle and Subtalar arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998;4:21–6.
Roukis TS. Determining the insertion site for retrograde intramedullary nail fixation of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a radiographic and intraoperative anatomical landmark analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:227–34.
Stephenson KA, Kile TA, Graves SC. Estimating the insertion site during retrograde intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:781–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, H.W., Mahajan, V., Kim, J.G. et al. Safe zone for the approach to the posterior sole (heel): a cadaver study. J Orthop Sci 16, 278–282 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0046-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0046-2