Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of complications associated with spinal endoscopic surgery: nationwide survey in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of Japanese Orthopaedic Association

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

This report was conducted to elucidate the current status of spinal endoscopic surgery and relevant incidents through analysis of the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA).

Methods

Questionnaire forms were sent to 2011 training facilities nationwide certified by the JOA, and 1082 of these facilities returned the filled questionnaires (response rate 53.8%). Of these facilities, 257 (23.8% of the responding facilities) undertook spinal endoscopic surgery in 2007. These institutions were asked to fill in the survey form with the details of the operations and relevant incidents as well as the incident levels.

Results

In total, the 257 facilities performed 6239 spinal endoscopic surgeries during 2007. Posterior spinal endoscopic surgery constituted most of the operations (6217 cases, 98.2%) including 4336 cases of microendoscopic discectomy (MED), 1273 cases of microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 379 cases of transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The total number of incidents was 133 (2.13%). The numbers of incidents by operative method were 75 (56.4%) during MED, 57 (42.9%) during microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 1 (0.8%) during interbody fusion. Of 133 incidents, dural tear occurred in 99 (74.4%), injury of the cauda equina or a nerve root in 7 (5.3%), facet fracture in 7 (5.3%), hematoma and wrong level in 6 each (4.5%), and wrong side and bedsore in 1 each (0.8%). The incident level was level 1 in 6, level 2 in 24, level 3a in 82, level 3b in 16, level 4 in 5, and level 5 (fatal) in 0.

Conclusions

The results of this survey revealed an increasing trend of spinal endoscopic surgery and a decreasing trend of the complication rates. The complication rates of spinal endoscopic surgery were not higher than those of conventional surgery, indicating the safety of this surgical method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Obenchain TG. Laparoscopic lumbar discectomy: case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991;1:145–149.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley KT, Smith MM. Microendoscopic discectomy. Techniques Neurosurg 1997;3:301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dezawa A. Surgical treatment of intra- or extra-foraminal nerve root encroachment with foraminoscopy using 10cc injector. J Musculoskelet Surg 1998;11:1201–1209 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yamagata M, Takahashi K, Aihara T, Arai H, Takayanagi K, Moriya H. Development of new endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Surg Technique Spine Spinal Nerves 1999;1:8–10 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leu HF, Schreiber A, Elsig JP, Zweifel K. Percutaneous disc surgery at Balgrist since 1979 — from discotomy to interbody fusion. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 1996;54:190–197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hijikata S. Percutaneous nucleotomy: a new concept technique and 12 years’ experience. Clin Orthop 1989;238:9–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Arthroscopy 1992;8:287–295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin N Am 2007;38:363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Nojiri K, Ishikawa M, Toyama Y, Nishikawa Y. Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomical study and a report of four cases. Spine 2002;27:E169–E173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 2002;27:432–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T, Oga M, Nakano S, Sasaki K, et al. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:624–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu X, Zhuang S, Mao Z, Chen H. Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique and outcome in 873 consecutive cases. Spine 2006;31:2689–2694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Ishii K, Watanabe K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y. Microendoscopic partial resection of the sacral ala to relieve extraforaminal entrapment of the L-5 spinal nerve at the lumbosacral tunnel: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:342–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tuji T, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, et al. Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation with bony fragment due to apophyseal separation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007;50:335–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishii K, Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Nakamura M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Endoscopic resection of cystic lesions in the lumbar spinal canal: a report of two cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005;48:240–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasegawa T, Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification. The present state of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification and spinal endoscopic surgery in Japan. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 2006;80:754–761 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hasegawa T, Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification. Annual report 2006 of the spinal endoscopic surgery in Japan. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 2007;81:1072–1077 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Li YY, Cheng CC. Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Res 2005;23:406–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sasaoka R, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Terai H, et al. Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED: compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 2006;15:577–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Righesso O, Falavigna A, Avanzi O. Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2007;61:545–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin DA, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoondo H. The efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;8:39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taneichi H, Nohara Y, Ueyama K, Kawahara N, Shiba K, Tani T, et al. Complication of the spine surgery: results of the complication survey of the Japan Spine Research Society. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 2006;80:5–16 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daneyemez M, Sali A, Kahraman S, Beduk A, Seber N. Outcome analyses in 1072 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1999;42:63–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quigley MR, Bost J, Maroon JC, Elrifai A, Panahandeh M. Outcome after microdiscectomy: results of a prospective single institutional study. Surg Neurol 1998;49:263–268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dei-Anang K, Kessel HA, Meinig G. Clinical follow-up after surgery of lumbar disc prolapses: a critical analysis. Neurosurg Rev 1990;13:201–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saxler G, Krämer J, Barden B, Kurt A, Pförtner J, Bernsmann K. The long-term clinical sequelae of incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 2005;30:2298–2302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Matsumoto, M., Hasegawa, T., Ito, M. et al. Incidence of complications associated with spinal endoscopic surgery: nationwide survey in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 15, 92–96 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1428-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1428-6

Keywords

Navigation