Skip to main content
Log in

Use of a unipedal standing test to assess the ambulation reacquisition time during the early postoperative stage after hip fracture in elderly Japanese: prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to predict the ambulation reacquisition time after hip fracture in elderly people using the unipedal standing test during the early postoperative stage.

Methods

Patients with an intertrochanteric fracture treated with internal fixation (n = 35) and patients with a femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (n = 22) were included. A unipedal standing test using the nonoperated leg was performed on days 3 and 7 after the operation.

Results

Among the patients with an intertrochanteric fracture, those with a positive result on the unipedal standing test on postoperative day (POD) 3 attained gait with parallel guide bars (BG) and walker-assisted gait (WG) significantly earlier than did patients with a negative result on the unipedal standing test. Patients with a positive result on the unipedal standing test on POD 7 attained BG, WG, and cane-assisted gait (CG) significantly earlier than did patients with a negative test. Among patients with a femoral neck fracture, those with a positive unipedal standing test result on POD 3 attained BG, WG, and CG significantly earlier than did patients with a negative test. Those with a positive test result on POD 7 attained BG, WG, and CG significantly earlier than did patients with a negative test.

Conclusions

The unipedal standing test given during the early postoperative stage is a good test for predicting the ambulation reacquisition time. Moreover, it gives information that can help determine the need for subacute rehabilitation and about discharge planning and health service provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dolan MM, Hawkes WG, Zimmerman SI, Morrison RS, Gruber-Baldini AL, Hebel JR, et al. Delirium on hospital admission in aged hip fracture patients: prediction of mortality and 2-year functional outcomes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M527–M534.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Magaziner J, Fredman L, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, Zimmerman S, Orwig DL, et al. Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patients to communitydwelling aged. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:1023–1031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaupre LA, Cinats JG, Senthilselvan A, Scharfenberger A, Johnston DW, Saunders LD. Does standardized rehabilitation and discharge planning improve functional recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2231–2239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Boonen S. The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women: a one-year, prospective, observational cohort study with matched-pair analysis — Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:493–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Saunders LD, Johnston DW, Buckingham J, Majumdar SR. Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic overview of the evidence. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:1019–1025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagino T, Sato E, Tonotsuka H, Ochiai S, Tokai M, Hamada Y. Prediction of ambulation prognosis in the elderly after hip fracture. Int Orthop 2006;30:315–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cree AK, Nade S. How to predict return to the community after fractured proximal femur in the elderly. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69:723–725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedley AK, Hendren DH, Mead LP. A posterior approach to the hip joint with complete posterior capsular and muscular repair. J Arthroplasty 1990;(suppl):S57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walheim G, Barrios C, Stark A, Brostrom LA, Olsson E. Postoperative improvement of walking capacity in patients with trochanteric hip fracture: a prospective analysis 3 and 6 months after surgery. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:137–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson MG, Allegrante JP, Cornell CN, MacKenzie CR, Robbins L, Horton R, et al. Measuring recovery after a hip fracture using the SF-36 and Cummings scales. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:296–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng CL, Lau S, Hui PW, Chow SP, Pun WK, Ng J, et al. Prognostic factors and progress for ambulation in elderly patients after hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989;68:230–233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, Meadows SE, Zuckerman JD. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture: a prospective study in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop 1995;310:150–159.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitamura S, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, Sasaki R, Iwata H, Wingstrand H, et al. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop 1998;348:29–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gehlsen GM, Whaley MH. Falls in the elderly. Part II. Balance, strength, and flexibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:739–741.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu MH, Woollacott MH. Multisensory training of standing balance in older adults. I. Postural stability and one-leg stance balance. J Gerontol 1994;49:M52–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takenori S. Evaluation of the time of one leg standing for elderly local residents with physical low-function. Seikei Saigaigeka 2007;50:17–25 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Murata, K., Sugitani, S., Yoshioka, H. et al. Use of a unipedal standing test to assess the ambulation reacquisition time during the early postoperative stage after hip fracture in elderly Japanese: prospective study. J Orthop Sci 15, 38–43 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1420-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1420-1

Keywords

Navigation