Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconstruction modality based on the spare part concept for massive soft tissue defects following oncological hemipelvectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Hemipelvectomy for massive malignancy can result in large soft tissue defects that cannot be reconstructed using conventional posterior flaps. For such cases, reconstruction methods, including a latissimus dorsi flap or a rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, may be applied, resulting in donor site morbidity. Recent innovations in plastic surgery have resulted in the development of novel reconstruction modalities based on “the spare part concept,” applying tissues from amputated limbs.

Methods

Five subjects with pelvic malignant tumors underwent hemipelvectomy with reconstruction using the spare part concept. Femoral artery-based myocutaneous flap and free fillet lower leg flap were used for three and two cases, respectively. The clinical results, including postoperative complications and oncological outcomes, were assessed.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 43.2 months (range 12–94 months). No local recurrence was encountered in any cases throughout follow-up. As of the final follow-up, three patients remained alive and two patients were dead due to distant metastasis. Minor postoperative infection was observed in two cases.

Conclusions

The femoral artery-based myocutaneous flap and the free fillet lower leg flap are both useful, safe options for reconstruction of the large defect following extensive hemipelvectomy for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. The present data support the continued application of these flap reconstruction techniques based on the spare part concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Senchenkov A, Moran SL, Petty PM, Knoetgen J 3rd, Clay RP, Bite U, et al. Predictors of complications and outcomes of external hemipelvectomy wounds: account of 160 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:355–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knox K, Bitzos I, Granick M, Datiashvili R, Benevenia J, Patterson F. Immediate reconstruction of oncologic hemipelvectomy defects. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57:184–189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross DA, Lohman RF, Kroll SS, Yasko AW, Robb GL, Evans GR, et al. Soft tissue reconstruction following hemipelvectomy. Am J Surg 1998;176:25–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrasekhar B, Sloan GM, Beatty JD. The external oblique myocutaneous flap for extended hemipelvectomy reconstruction. Cancer 1988;62:1022–1025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Küntscher MV, Erdmann D, Homann HH, Steinau HU, Levin SL, Germann G. The concept of fillet flaps: classification, indications, and analysis of their clinical value. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:885–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto Y, Sugihara T. Pelvic reconstruction with a free fillet lower leg flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1475–1476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Ainsle N, et al. Free filet extremity flap: indications and options for reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:99–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erdmann D, Sundin BM, Yasui K, Wong MS, Levin LS. Microsurgical free flap transfer to amputation sites: indications and results. Ann Plast Surg 2002;48:167–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lotze MT, Sugarbaker PH. Femoral artery based myocutaneous flap for hemipelvectomy closure: amputation after failed limbsparing surgery and radiotherapy. Am J Surg 1985;150:625–630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Takeda N. Pelvic reconstruction with a free fillet lower leg flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1439–1441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawaguchi N, Ahmed AR, Matsumoto S, Manabe J, Matsushita Y. The concept of curative margin in surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop 2004;419:165–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawaguchi N, Matumoto S, Manabe J. New method of evaluating the surgical margin and safety margin for musculoskeletal sarcoma, analysed on the basis of 457 surgical cases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1995;121:555–563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baliski CR, Schachar NS, McKinnon JG, Stuart GC, Temple WJ. Hemipelvectomy: a changing perspective for a rare procedure. Can J Surg 2004;47:99–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frey C, Matthews LS, Benjamin H, Fidler WJ. A new technique for hemipelvectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;143:753–756.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugarbaker PH, Chretien PA. Hemipelvectomy for buttock tumors utilizing an anterior myocutaneous flap of quadriceps femoris muscle. Ann Surg 1983;197:106–115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell RC, Vitale V, Zook EC. Extremity reconstruction using the “fillet of sole” flap. Ann Plast Surg 1986;17:65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frykman GK, Jobe CM. Amputation salvage with microvascular free flap from the amputated extremity. J Trauma 1987;27:326–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Morii, T., Susa, M., Nakayama, R. et al. Reconstruction modality based on the spare part concept for massive soft tissue defects following oncological hemipelvectomy. J Orthop Sci 14, 192–197 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1316-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1316-5

Keywords

Navigation