Advertisement

Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 835–843 | Cite as

Metabolic characteristics of subjects with spine–femur bone mineral density discordances: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES 2008–2011)

  • A Ram Hong
  • Jung Hee Kim
  • Ji Hyun Lee
  • Sang Wan Kim
  • Chan Soo ShinEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is determined based on the lowest bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at the lumbar spine (LS) and hip. However, there are occasional marked discordances between the T-score of LS and femur neck (FN). We aimed to examine the prevalence and characteristics of individuals with spine–femur BMD discordance using a nationwide survey. A total of 3233 men aged ≥ 50 years and 2915 postmenopausal women were included from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (2008–2011). The spine–femur discordance was defined as a difference of ≥ 1.5 SD between LS and FN BMD. Subjects were divided into three groups: low LS (LS < FN), low FN (LS > FN), and no discordance. Four-hundred and seventeen men (12.9%) and two hundred and ninety women (10%) exhibited spine–femur BMD discordance. The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes was higher in men and women with low FN BMD than in any other group. Fasting plasma glucose and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance was the highest in subjects with low FN BMD among the three groups. Low FN BMD revealed higher serum parathyroid hormone and lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels compared to any other group in women, but this was not observed in men. Osteoporosis was prevalent in subjects with discordance in both genders, particularly, in those with low LS BMD (31.6% in men and 63.5% in women). Given the high prevalence of spine–femur BMD discordance, low FN BMD may be associated with vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance, but low LS BMD may present severe osteoporosis.

Keywords

Spine–femur discordance Bone mineral density T-score Osteoporosis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

A. Ram Hong, Jung Hee Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Sang Wan Kim, and Chan Soo Shin declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

774_2018_980_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanis JA, Gluer CC (2000) An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int 11:192–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmed AI, Blake GM, Rymer JM, Fogelman I (1997) Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis? Osteoporos Int 7:432–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faulkner KG, von Stetten E, Miller P (1999) Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 2:343–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woodson G (2000) Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between the hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom 3:319–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mounach A, Abayi DA, Ghazi M, Ghozlani I, Nouijai A, Achemlal L, Bezza A, El Maghraoui A (2009) Discordance between hip and spine bone mineral density measurement using DXA: prevalence and risk factors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 38:467–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moayyeri A, Soltani A, Tabari NK, Sadatsafavi M, Hossein-Neghad A, Larijani B (2005) Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry. BMC Endocr Disord 5:3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alarkawi D, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2016) Contribution of lumbar spine BMD to fracture risk in individuals with T-score discordance. J Bone Miner Res 31:274–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mulder JE, Michaeli D, Flaster ER, Siris E (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip, and forearm for the assessment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 3:373–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abrahamsen B, Stilgren LS, Hermann AP, Tofteng CL, Barenholdt O, Vestergaard P, Brot C, Nielsen SP (2001) Discordance between changes in bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites in perimenopausal women—implications for assessment of bone loss and response to therapy: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 16:1212–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El Maghraoui A, Mouinga Abayi DA, Ghozlani I, Mounach A, Nouijai A, Ghazi M, Achemlal L, Bezza A (2007) Prevalence and risk factors of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry. Ann Rheum Dis 66:271–272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahn SH, Lee SH, Kim H, Kim BJ, Koh JM (2014) Different relationships between body compositions and bone mineral density according to gender and age in Korean populations (KNHANES 2008–2010). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:3811–3820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim YJ, Jeon JY, Han SJ, Kim HJ, Lee KW, Kim DJ (2015) Effect of socio-economic status on the prevalence of diabetes. Yonsei Med J 56:641–647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, Paffenbarger RS Jr (1993) Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:71–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoeller DA, Tylavsky FA, Baer DJ et al (2005) QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 81:1018–1025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelly TL, Wilson KE, Heymsfield SB (2009) Dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES. PLoS One 4:e7038CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18:499–502Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kohrt WM, Snead DB, Slatopolsky E, Birge SJ Jr (1995) Additive effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 10:1303–1311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reid IR, Evans MC, Ames R, Wattie DJ (1991) The influence of osteophytes and aortic calcification on spinal mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1372–1374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh M, Magon N, Singh T (2012) Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Midlife Health 3:76–80PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV, Strotmeyer ES, Robbins J, Rodriguez BL, Johnson KC, Margolis KL (2006) Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3404–3410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hanley DA, Brown JP, Tenenhouse A et al (2003) Associations among disease conditions, bone mineral density, and prevalent vertebral deformities in men and women 50 years of age and older: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 18:784–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paccou J, Ward KA, Jameson KA, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Edwards MH (2016) Bone microarchitecture in men and women with diabetes: the importance of cortical porosity. Calcif Tissue Int 98:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu EW, Putman MS, Derrico N, Abrishamanian-Garcia G, Finkelstein JS, Bouxsein ML (2015) Defects in cortical microarchitecture among African-American women with type 2 diabetes. Osteoporos Int 26:673–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, Davis KA, Masharani U, Majumdar S, Link TM (2010) High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:5045–5055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patsch JM, Burghardt AJ, Yap SP, Baum T, Schwartz AV, Joseph GB, Link TM (2013) Increased cortical porosity in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with fragility fractures. J Bone Miner Res 28:313–324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Samelson EJ, Demissie S, Cupples LA et al (2017) Diabetes and deficits in cortical bone density, microarchitecture, and bone size: Framingham HR-pQCT Study. J Bone Miner Res 33:54–62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fink DFJ, Zhang C, Anderson LB, Jiang H, Cremers S, Nishiyama K, Zhou H, Dempster D, Poundarik A, Silverberg S, Vashishth D, Rubin M (2014) Bone properties in type 2 diabetes are associated with the advanced glycation end product pentosidine. J Bone Miner Res 29(Suppl 1):S116–S117Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamagishi S (2011) Role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in osteoporosis in diabetes. Curr Drug Targets 12:2096–2102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Steingrimsdottir L, Gunnarsson O, Indridason OS, Franzson L, Sigurdsson G (2005) Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone levels, vitamin D sufficiency, and calcium intake. JAMA 294:2336–2341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Kiel DP, Dawson-Hughes B, Orav JE, Li R, Spiegelman D, Dietrich T, Willett WC (2009) Dietary calcium and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in relation to BMD among US adults. J Bone Miner Res 24:935–942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Joo NS, Dawson-Hughes B, Kim YS, Oh K, Yeum KJ (2013) Impact of calcium and vitamin D insufficiencies on serum parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density: analysis of the fourth and fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV-3, 2009 and KNHANES V-1, 2010). J Bone Miner Res 28:764–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tenne M, McGuigan F, Besjakov J, Gerdhem P, Akesson K (2013) Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine—implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women. Osteoporos Int 24:1419–1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Melton LJ 3rd, O’Neill T, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2006) The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:527–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leslie WD, Lix LM, Tsang JF, Caetano PA (2007) Single-site vs multisite bone density measurement for fracture prediction. Arch Intern Med 167:1641–1647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leslie WD, Lix LM (2011) Absolute fracture risk assessment using lumbar spine and femoral neck bone density measurements: derivation and validation of a hybrid system. J Bone Miner Res 26:460–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leslie WD, Kovacs CS, Olszynski WP, Towheed T, Kaiser SM, Prior JC, Josse RG, Jamal SA, Kreiger N, Goltzman D (2011) Spine–hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX((R)): a population-based report from CAMOS. J Clin Densitom 14:286–293CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Spine–hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement. Osteoporos Int 22:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Blackburn TD, Howard DB, Leib ES (2013) Utility of spine bone mineral density in fracture prediction within FRAX. J Clin Densitom 16:81–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A Ram Hong
    • 1
  • Jung Hee Kim
    • 2
  • Ji Hyun Lee
    • 2
  • Sang Wan Kim
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chan Soo Shin
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineChonnam National University Medical SchoolGwangjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Internal MedicineSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineSeoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations