Metabolic characteristics of subjects with spine–femur bone mineral density discordances: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES 2008–2011)
- 146 Downloads
The diagnosis of osteoporosis is determined based on the lowest bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at the lumbar spine (LS) and hip. However, there are occasional marked discordances between the T-score of LS and femur neck (FN). We aimed to examine the prevalence and characteristics of individuals with spine–femur BMD discordance using a nationwide survey. A total of 3233 men aged ≥ 50 years and 2915 postmenopausal women were included from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (2008–2011). The spine–femur discordance was defined as a difference of ≥ 1.5 SD between LS and FN BMD. Subjects were divided into three groups: low LS (LS < FN), low FN (LS > FN), and no discordance. Four-hundred and seventeen men (12.9%) and two hundred and ninety women (10%) exhibited spine–femur BMD discordance. The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes was higher in men and women with low FN BMD than in any other group. Fasting plasma glucose and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance was the highest in subjects with low FN BMD among the three groups. Low FN BMD revealed higher serum parathyroid hormone and lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels compared to any other group in women, but this was not observed in men. Osteoporosis was prevalent in subjects with discordance in both genders, particularly, in those with low LS BMD (31.6% in men and 63.5% in women). Given the high prevalence of spine–femur BMD discordance, low FN BMD may be associated with vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance, but low LS BMD may present severe osteoporosis.
KeywordsSpine–femur discordance Bone mineral density T-score Osteoporosis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
A. Ram Hong, Jung Hee Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Sang Wan Kim, and Chan Soo Shin declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 11.Abrahamsen B, Stilgren LS, Hermann AP, Tofteng CL, Barenholdt O, Vestergaard P, Brot C, Nielsen SP (2001) Discordance between changes in bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites in perimenopausal women—implications for assessment of bone loss and response to therapy: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 16:1212–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18:499–502Google Scholar
- 24.Hanley DA, Brown JP, Tenenhouse A et al (2003) Associations among disease conditions, bone mineral density, and prevalent vertebral deformities in men and women 50 years of age and older: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 18:784–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, Davis KA, Masharani U, Majumdar S, Link TM (2010) High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:5045–5055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Fink DFJ, Zhang C, Anderson LB, Jiang H, Cremers S, Nishiyama K, Zhou H, Dempster D, Poundarik A, Silverberg S, Vashishth D, Rubin M (2014) Bone properties in type 2 diabetes are associated with the advanced glycation end product pentosidine. J Bone Miner Res 29(Suppl 1):S116–S117Google Scholar
- 34.Joo NS, Dawson-Hughes B, Kim YS, Oh K, Yeum KJ (2013) Impact of calcium and vitamin D insufficiencies on serum parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density: analysis of the fourth and fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV-3, 2009 and KNHANES V-1, 2010). J Bone Miner Res 28:764–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Leslie WD, Kovacs CS, Olszynski WP, Towheed T, Kaiser SM, Prior JC, Josse RG, Jamal SA, Kreiger N, Goltzman D (2011) Spine–hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX((R)): a population-based report from CAMOS. J Clin Densitom 14:286–293CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar