Advertisement

Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 462–466 | Cite as

Histology of a Harris line in a human distal tibia

  • Justyna J. MiszkiewiczEmail author
Rapid Communication

Abstract

Identification and diagnosis of Harris lines (HLs) is usually achieved using radiography. To date, histological methods have been mainly implemented in research exploring the underlying processes of HL deposition using longitudinal sections taken from animal bone. Here, a new insight into HL formation is provided following transverse histological sectioning in a human specimen. A distinct HL was identified macroscopically, and from a radiograph, in a left distal tibia taken from an adult human male. Transverse sections were taken through the HL, and also from trabeculae immediately superior and inferior to the HL. Thin sections were produced following standard histological procedures. Micrographs were captured using a digital microscope camera. Trabeculae immediately superior and inferior to the HL displayed no indication of abnormal growth, exhibiting abundant osteocyte lacunae and a lamellar structure. However, the micro-anatomy of the HL was characterised by the following three main features: (1) non-lamellar appearance, (2) a complete lack of osteocyte lacunae, and (3) presence of irregularly distributed tubular structures. These three histological features indicate a specific process of bone deposition, implying that trapping of osteoblasts may not take place during HL formation. Pictorial and descriptive records of HL histology are provided, aiding current understanding about the nature of HL, its identification from histology, and serving as a reference point for future comparative research.

Keywords

Harris line Histology Tibia Trabeculae Osteocyte lacunae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr. Patrick Mahoney for guidance, Dr. Tom Booth for discussions, and the School of Anthropology and Conservation (University of Kent, Canterbury, UK) for PhD funding. The X-ray images were provided by the Kent and Canterbury Hospital as part of an earlier osteological analysis undertaken on the reported skeletal collection. My thanks are extended to the Editor-in-Chief and two anonymous reviewers whose invaluable comments improved an earlier version of this communication.

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Harris H (1931) Lines of arrested growth in the long bones of diabetic children. Br Med J 1:713–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee MMC (1968) Natural markers in bone growth. Am J Phys Anth 29:295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kennedy JW, Irwin GJ, Huntley JS (2014) Growth arrest lines and intra-epiphyseal silhouettes: a case series. BMC Res Notes 7:27PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beom J, Woo EJ, Lee IS, Kim MJ, Kim YS, Oh CS, Lee SS, Lim SB, Shin DH (2014) Harris lines observed in human skeletons of Joseon Dynasty, Korea. Anat Cell Biol 47:66–72PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park EA, Richter CP (1953) Transverse lines in bone: the mechanism of their development. B Johns Hopkins Hosp 93:234–248Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papageorgopoulou C, Suter SK, Rühli FJ, Siegmund F (2011) Harris lines revisited: prevalence, comorbidities, and possible etiologies. Am J Hum Biol 23:381–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ameen S, Staub L, Ulrich S, Vock P, Ballmer F, Anderson SE (2005) Harris lines of the tibia across centuries: a comparison of two populations, medieval and contemporary in Central Europe. Skeletal Radiol 34:279–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alfonso MP, Thompson JL, Standen VG (2005) Reevaluating Harris lines—a comparison between Harris lines and enamel hypoplasia. Coll Antropol 29:393–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall WA (1968) Problems in relating the presence of transverse lines in the radius to the occurrence of disease. In: Brothwell DR (ed) Skeletal Biology of Earlier Human Populations. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 241–261Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mays S (1995) The relationship between Harris lines and other aspects of skeletal development in adults and juveniles. J Archaeological Sci 22:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alfonso-Durruty MP (2011) Experimental assessment of nutrition and bone growth’s velocity effects on Harris lines formation. Am J Phys Anth 145:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park EA (1964) Imprinting of nutritional disturbances on the growing bone. Paediatrics 33:815–861Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cameron N, Bogin B (2012) Human growth and development. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ribot I, Roberts C (1996) A study of non-specific stress indicators and skeletal growth in two Mediaeval subadult populations. J Arch Sci 23:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huss-Ashmore R, Goodman AH, Armelagos GJ (1982) Nutritional inference from paleopathology. In: Schiffer MB (Ed) Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. vol 5. pp 395–474Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McHenry H (1968) Transverse lines in long bones of prehistoric California Indians. Am J Phys Anth 29:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allison MJ, Mendozo D, Pezzia A (1974) A radiographic approach to childhood illness in precolumbian inhabitants of southern Peru. Am J Phys Anth 40:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gronkiewicz S, Kornafel D, Kwiatkowska B, Nowakowski D (2001) Harris’s lines versus children’s living conditions in medieval Wrocław, Poland. Var Evol 9:45–50Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Platt BS, Stewart RJC (1962) Transverse trabeculae and osteoporosis in bones in experimental protein-calorie deficiency. Br J Nutr 16:483–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    González-Reimers E, Pérez-Ramírez A, Santolaria-Fernández F, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Martínez-Riera A, Durán-Castellón MDC, Remedios Alemán-Valls M, Gaspar MR (2007) Association of Harris lines and shorter stature with ethanol consumption during growth. Alcohol 41:511–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bagnall KM, Harris PF, Jones PRM (1982) A radiographic study of the longitudinal growth of primary ossification centers in limb long bones of the human fetus. Anat Rec 203:293–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeology Survey, FayettevilleGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    MacChiarelli R, Bondioli L, Censi L, Hernaez MK, Salvadei L, Sperduti A (1994) Intra-and interobserver concordance in scoring Harris lines: a test on bone sections and radiographs. Am J Phys Anth 95:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hicks M, Hicks A (2001) St. Gregory’s Priory, Northgate, Canterbury Excavations 1988–1991. Canterbury Archaeological Trust LtdGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology Code of Ethics (2008) http://www.babao.org.uk/index/ethics-and-standards
  26. 26.
    British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology Code of Practice (2010) http://www.babao.org.uk/index/ethics-and-standards
  27. 27.
    Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association (2012) http://ethics.aaanet.org/ethics-statement-0-preamble/
  28. 28.
    Code of Ethics of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (2003) http://physanth.org/documents/3/ethics.pdf
  29. 29.
    Mays S, Elders J, Humphrey L, White W, Marshall P (2013) Science and the Dead: guidelines for the destructive sampling of archaeological human remains for scientific analysis. Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England, English HeritageGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bancroft JD, Gamble M (2008) Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Elsevier Health SciencesGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bromage TG, Lacruz RS, Hogg R, Goldman HM, McFarlin SC, Warshaw J, Dirks W, Perez Ochoa A, Smolyar I, Enlow DH, Boyde A (2009) Lamellar bone is an incremental tissue reconciling enamel rhythms, body size, and organismal life history. Calcif Tissue Int 84:388–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall BK (2005) Bones and Cartilage: Developmental and Evolutionary Skeletal Biology. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Webster SS (2005) The past, present, and future of bone morphometry: its contribution to an improved understanding of bone biology. J Bone Mineral Metab 23:1–10Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ogden JA (1984) Growth slowdown and arrest lines. J Pediatr Orthop 4:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Egawa K, Takiguchi R, Inokuchi S, Sugamiya H, Kimura T (2000) Three dimensional ultrastructure of transverse (Harris) lines in the long bone. Ital J Anat Embryol 106:135–140Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nowak O, Piontek J (2002) Does the occurrence of Harris lines affect the morphology of human long bones? J Comp Hum Biol 52:254–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research and Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Anthropology and ConservationUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations