Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bioimpedance: can its addition to simple clinical criteria enhance the diagnosis of osteoporosis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a great need for a simple means to identify individuals at risk of osteoporosis. Because bioimpedance (BI) estimates body composition, which is highly related to bone mineral density (BMD), we aimed to define the usefulness of BI to assess BMD. The relationships between BI and BMD were quantified using partial correlations. Multiple linear regression with a forward selection method was used to examine the predictive abilities of various body measurements on BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The abilities of BI to discriminate low BMD or to discriminate osteoporosis were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The relationships between BI and BMD at the spine and hip were evaluated in 345 Southern Chinese postmenopausal women and 390 men. After adjusting for age and weight, BI was inversely associated with BMD in both sexes (r = −0.053 to −0.195). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that BI is a significant independent predictor of BMD in men. This finding was not confirmed in women. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) for BI as a single predictor to diagnose osteoporosis was 0.658 and 0.655 in women and men, respectively. The AUC was improved slightly with the addition of BI in the model that consisted of age and weight alone. Although BI was significantly associated with BMD, addition of BI did not enhance the ability to diagnose osteoporosis significantly compared with simple clinical criteria such as age and weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lane NE (2006) Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2(Suppl):S3–S11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ, O’Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 7:1185–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 15:1889–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanis JA, Melton LJIII, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1141

    Google Scholar 

  5. US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 6:526–528

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases UoS, UK. Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/index.htm. Accessed 2 May 2008

  7. Kung AW, Ho AY, Ross PD, Reginster JY (2005) Development of a clinical assessment tool in identifying Asian men with low bone mineral density and comparison of its usefulness to quantitative bone ultrasound. Osteoporos Int 7:849–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kung AW, Ho AY, Sedrine WB, Reginster JY, Ross PD (2003) Comparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 9:716–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Langendonck L, Claessens AL, Lefevre J, Thomis M, Philippaerts R, Delvaux K, Lysens R, Vanden Eynde B, Beunen G (2002) Association between bone mineral density (DXA), body structure, and body composition in middle-aged men. Am J Hum Biol 6:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Compston JE, Bhambhani M, Laskey MA, Murphy S, Khaw KT (1992) Body composition and bone mass in post-menopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 5:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reid IR, Plank LD, Evans MC (1992) Fat mass is an important determinant of whole body bone density in premenopausal women but not in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 3:779–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Douchi T, Matsuo T, Uto H, Kuwahata T, Oki T, Nagata Y (2003) Lean body mass and bone mineral density in physically exercising postmenopausal women. Maturitas 3:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Douchi T, Kuwahata R, Matsuo T, Uto H, Oki T, Nagata Y (2003) Relative contribution of lean and fat mass component to bone mineral density in males. J Bone Miner Metab 1:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietrobelli A, Rubiano F, St-Onge MP, Heymsfield SB (2004) New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 11:1479–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie X, Kolthoff N, Barenholt O, Nielsen SP (1999) Validation of a leg-to-leg bioimpedance analysis system in assessing body composition in postmenopausal women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 10:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kung AW, Lee KK, Ho AY, Tang G, Luk KD (2007) Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women according to clinical risk factors and BMD T-scores: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 7:1080–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kung AW, Luk KD, Chu LW, Tang GW (1999) Quantitative ultrasound and symptomatic vertebral fracture risk in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 6:456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kung AW, Yeung SS, Lau KS (1998) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and peak bone mass in southern Chinese women. Bone (NY) 4:389–393

    Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  20. Caton JR, Mole PA, Adams WC, Heustis DS (1988) Body composition analysis by bioelectrical impedance: effect of skin temperature. Med Sci Sports Exerc 5:489–491

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liang MT, Norris S (1993) Effects of skin blood flow and temperature on bioelectric impedance after exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 11:1231–1239

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 3:839–843

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lohman TG (1981) Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: a review. Hum Biol 2:181–225

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW (1987) Theory and validation of the tetra-polar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. In: Ellis KJ, Yasumura S, Morgan WD (eds) In vivo body composition studies. Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Anderson JJ (1993) Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: the Framingham study. J Bone Miner Res 5:567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Margolis KL, Ensrud KE, Schreiner PJ, Tabor HK (2000) Body size and risk for clinical fractures in older women: study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 2:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baumgartner RN, Stauber PM, Koehler KM, Romero L, Garry PJ (1996) Associations of fat and muscle masses with bone mineral in elderly men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 3:365–372

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hamrick MW, Ferrari SL (2007) Leptin and the sympathetic connection of fat to bone. Osteoporos Int (published Online First: 9 October 2007. doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0487-9)

  29. Kirschner MA, Samojlik E, Drejka M, Szmal E, Schneider G, Ertel N (1990) Androgen-estrogen metabolism in women with upper body versus lower body obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the staff at the Osteoporosis Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, for their assistance in this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Heidi H. Y. Ngai, Ching-Lung Cheung & Annie W. C. Kung

  2. Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Tzy-Jyun Yao

Authors
  1. Heidi H. Y. Ngai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ching-Lung Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tzy-Jyun Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Annie W. C. Kung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annie W. C. Kung.

About this article

Cite this article

Ngai, H.H.Y., Cheung, CL., Yao, TJ. et al. Bioimpedance: can its addition to simple clinical criteria enhance the diagnosis of osteoporosis?. J Bone Miner Metab 27, 372–378 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-009-0043-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-009-0043-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation