Skip to main content

Age-related trends in hip geometry in Sri Lankan women: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Indices of hip geometry are known to be predictive of hip fractures while sex and ethnic differences in hip geometry have been previously demonstrated. Age-related trends in hip geometry among Asians, however, have not been studied sufficiently. A total of 280 healthy, perimenopausal women, aged between 32 and 97 years, were selected from the Community Study Area of the Faculty of Medicine, Galle, Sri Lanka. Hip DXA images were analyzed further to calculate the hip axis length, neck-shaft angle, and femoral neck width at the narrowest point of the femoral neck. Standard formulae were used to calculate cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus in the femoral neck region. Mean (SD) age, weight, height, femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), hip axis length, neck-shaft angle, neck width, cross-sectional area, and cross-sectional moment of inertia of the study sample were 56.8 (13.0) years, 47.8 (10.1) kg, 1.48 (0.06) m, 0.704 (0.147) g/cm2, 90.6 (5.6) mm, 123.2 (5.7)°, 2.99 (0.24) cm, 2.00 (0.42) cm2, and 1.62 (0.47) cm4, respectively. Height and weight of subjects had positive correlations with most of the indices of hip geometry. Femoral neck BMD, cross-sectional area and section modulus showed a rapid reduction during the postmenopausal period. With advancing age, there was a marginal but statistically nonsignificant expansion of the neck width, increase in the hip axis length, and narrowing of the neck-shaft angle. In conclusion, this study demonstrated a gradual loss of BMD in postmenopausal age, accompanied by thinning of the cortical shell and deterioration of the resistance to bending in the femoral neck of this group of healthy women. The clinical relevance of the marginal changes seen in other indices such as neck-shaft angle, hip axis length, and neck width is not known.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1

    SR Cummings DM Black MC Nevitt W Browner J Cauley K Ensrud HK Genant L Palermo J Scott TM Vogt (1993) ArticleTitleBone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Lancet 341 72–75 Occurrence Handle8093403 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3MnltFY%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    BC Taylor PJ Schreiner KL Stone HA Fink SR Cummings MC Nevitt PJ Bowman KE Ensrud (2004) ArticleTitleLong-term prediction of incident hip fracture risk in elderly white women: study of osteoporotic fractures J Am Geriatr Soc 52 1479–1486 Occurrence Handle15341549 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52410.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    S Fujiwara F Kasagi N Masunari K Naito G Suzuki M Fukunaga (2003) ArticleTitleFracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women J Bone Miner Res 18 1547–1553 Occurrence Handle12929946 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1547

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    YZ Bagger LB Tanko P Alexandersen HB Hansen G Qin C Christiansen (2006) ArticleTitleThe long-term predictive value of bone mineral density measurements for fracture risk is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis: results from the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factors study Osteoporos Int 17 471–477 Occurrence Handle16261280 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-005-0009-6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    JA Robbins AM Schott P Garnero PD Delmas D Hans PJ Meunier (2005) ArticleTitleRisk factors for hip fracture in women with high BMD: EPIDOS study Osteoporos Int 16 149–154 Occurrence Handle15185066 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-004-1661-y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FksVenug%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    KG Faulkner WK Wacker HS Barden C Simonelli PK Burke S Ragi L Del Rio (2006) ArticleTitleFemur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length Osteoporos Int 17 593–599 Occurrence Handle16447009 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-005-0019-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD287msF2muw%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    A Frisoli SuffixJr AP Paula M Pinheiro VL Szejnfeld R Delmonte Piovezan E Takata T Araujo Silva PH Chaves (2005) ArticleTitleHip axis length as an independent risk factor for hip fracture independently of femoral bone mineral density in Caucasian elderly Brazilian women Bone (NY) 37 871–875

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    S Gnudi N Malavolta D Testi M Viceconti (2004) ArticleTitleDifferences in proximal femur geometry distinguish vertebral from femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic women Br J Radiol 77 219–223 Occurrence Handle15020363 Occurrence Handle10.1259/bjr/79551075 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7mtFChsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    DD Cody GW Divine K Nahigian M Kleerekoper (2000) ArticleTitleBone density distribution and gender dominate femoral neck fracture risk predictors Skeletal Radiol 29 151–161 Occurrence Handle10794552 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002560050585 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lt1Gntw%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    X Cheng J Li Y Lu J Keyak T Lang (2007) ArticleTitleProximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with hip fracture Bone (NY) 40 169–174 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jhvV2gug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    SR Cummings JA Cauley L Palermo PD Ross RD Wasnich D Black KG Faulkner (1994) ArticleTitleRacial differences in hip axis lengths might explain racial differences in rates of hip fracture. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Osteoporos Int 4 226–229 Occurrence Handle7949753 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01623243 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD3sjgs1w%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    K Chin MC Evans J Cornish T Cundy IR Reid (1997) ArticleTitleDifferences in hip axis and femoral neck length in premenopausal women of Polynesian, Asian and European origin Osteoporos Int 7 344–347 Occurrence Handle9373568 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01623775 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FktVyquw%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    DA Nelson DA Barondess SL Hendrix TJ Beck (2000) ArticleTitleCross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women J Bone Miner Res 15 1992–1997 Occurrence Handle11028452 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.10.1992 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvnslSrsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    L Yan NJ Crabtree J Reeve B Zhou J Dequeker J Nijs JA Falch A Prentice (2004) ArticleTitleDoes hip strength analysis explain the lower incidence of hip fracture in the People's Republic of China? Bone (NY) 34 584–588 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7htlCmuw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Y Duan TJ Beck XF Wang E Seeman (2003) ArticleTitleStructural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging J Bone Miner Res 18 1766–1774 Occurrence Handle14584886 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1766

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    TJ Beck AC Looker CB Ruff H Sievanen HW Wahner (2000) ArticleTitleStructural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data J Bone Miner Res 15 2297–2304 Occurrence Handle11127194 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2297 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpsF2mtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    BL Riggs LJ Melton SuffixIII RA Robb JJ Camp EJ Atkinson JM Peterson PA Rouleau CH McCollough ML Bouxsein S Khosla (2004) ArticleTitlePopulation-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites J Bone Miner Res 19 1945–1954 Occurrence Handle15537436 Occurrence Handle10.1359/JBMR.040916

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    TJ Beck TL Oreskovic KL Stone CB Ruff K Ensrud MC Nevitt HK Genant SR Cummings (2001) ArticleTitleStructural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures J Bone Miner Res 16 1108–1119 Occurrence Handle11393788 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1108 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FhtFKrtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    XF Wang Y Duan TJ Beck E Seeman (2005) ArticleTitleVarying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age Bone (NY) 36 978–986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarath Lekamwasam.

About this article

Cite this article

Lekamwasam, S., Lenora, J. Age-related trends in hip geometry in Sri Lankan women: a cross-sectional study. J Bone Miner Metab 25, 431–435 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0762-z

Download citation

Key words

  • postmenopausal osteoporosis
  • hip structure
  • Sri Lanka