Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone densitometry: which skeletal sites are best predicted by bone mass determinants?

  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of bone mineral content/bone mass density (BMC/BMD) is important to determine bone mass development among adolescents in health and disease. It is uncertain at which skeletal site BMC/BMD is best predicted by bone mass determinants. On the other hand, intrapersonal BMC/BMD data can be clustered into a composite index score to facilitate correlation and outcome prediction analysis. This study aimed to identify the skeletal site that was best predicted by bone mass determinants and to develop a composite index score based on multisite BMC/BMD values in healthy adolescent girls. Eleven BMD/BMC variables per subject were evaluated by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in 236 healthy girls aged 12–15 years. Bone mass determinants, namely, weight, height, puberty, dietary calcium, physical activity, and bone turnover markers, were determined. Factor analysis was used to develop composite index scores that summarized characteristics of multisite BMC/BMD. Results showed that lumbar spinal BMD and BMC (by DXA) and tibial integral BMD (by pQCT) were the BMC/BMD sites better predicted by bone mass determinants (R 2, 0.57–0.77) in multiple regression analysis. On the other hand, three composite index scores representing areal BMD, areal BMC, and vBMD were derived to summarize the original BMC/BMD values. The composite index scores had similar predicting power (R 2, 0.419–0.749) compared to those of original BMC/BMD, indicating that the composite index scores were representative of the original variables. To conclude, lumbar spinal BMD and BMC and tibial integral BMD were the three BMC/BMD variables better predicted by bone mass determinants. This evaluation would help select appropriate skeletal sites as outcome measures for bone mass evaluation in future studies. Also, the development of composite index scores could help reduce the number of variables for correlation and outcome prediction analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack C.Y. Cheng.

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, W., Cheung, A., Lau, J. et al. Bone densitometry: which skeletal sites are best predicted by bone mass determinants?. J Bone Miner Metab 22, 447–455 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-004-0506-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-004-0506-2

Key words

Navigation