Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental investigation of the hydrodynamic effects of breaking waves on monopiles in model scale

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, a hydrodynamic model test of the monopile of the NREL 5-MW offshore wind turbine is carried out, and relevant data are presented. The effects of highly non-linear breaking waves were measured in terms of the wave run-up and wave loads around the offshore wind turbine monopile. The wave run-up and the interaction between the non-linear wave load and the monopile were analyzed at different positions around the monopile. The wave run-up around the monopile for the wave breaking conditions is quantified approximately twice the amplitude of the incident wave height. For specific examined wave breaking conditions, the wave height in front of the monopile is lower than behind the monopile. Empirical calculations are also used to verify the experimental results. The wave breaking forces calculated using the empirical formulas are conservative compared with the experimental data, although the experimentally measured maximum wave breaking force is smaller than that calculated one using relevant analytical methods. The present paper gives an insight into the design of monopile foundations for specific wave breaking conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Global Wind Energy Council (2020) Global wind report 2019

  2. Europe W (2020) Offshore Wind in Europe: Key Trends and Statistics 2019

  3. Shi W, Zhang L, Karimirad M, Michailides C, Jiang Z, Li X (2023) Combined effects of aerodynamic and second-order hydrodynamic loads for three semisubmersible floating wind turbines in different water depths. Appl Ocean Res 130:103416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Shi W, Li D, Li X, Duan Y, Verma AS (2022) A novel framework for modeling floating offshore wind turbines based on the vector form intrinsic finite element (VFIFE) method. Ocean Eng 262:112221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai Y, Zhao H, Li X, Liu Y (2023) Effects of yawed inflow and blade-tower interaction on the aerodynamic and wake characteristics of a horizontal-axis wind turbine. Energy 264:126246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karimirad M, Michailides C (2019) Fault condition effects on the dynamic response of V-shaped offshore wind turbine. J Mar Sci and Tech 24:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adilah A, Iijima K (2022) A spectral approach for efficient fatigue damage evaluation of floating support structure for offshore wind turbine taking account of aerodynamic coupling effects. J Mar Sci Tech 27:408–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruzzo C, Arena F (2019) A numerical study on the dynamic response of a floating spar platform in extreme waves. J Mar Sci Tech 24:1135–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma G, Zhong L, Zhang X, Ma Q, Kang H (2020) Mechanism of mooring line breakage of floating offshore wind turbine under extreme coherent gust with direction change condition. J Mar Sci Tech 25:1283–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng X, Shi W, Michailides C, Zhang S, Li X (2021) Numerical and experimental investigation of breaking wave forces on a monopile-type offshore wind turbine. Renewe Energy 175:501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Irschik K, Sparboo U, Oumeraci H (2005) Breaking wave loads on a slender pile in shallow water. In Coastal Engineering 2004. World Scientific Volumn 4:568–580

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wienke J, Oumeraci H (2005) Breaking wave impact force on a vertical and inclined slender pile-theoretical and large-scale model investigations. Coast Eng 52(5):435–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu Z, Mai T, Greaves D, Raby A (2017) Investigations of offshore breaking wave impacts on a large offshore structure. J Fluid Struct 75:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suja-Thauvin L, Krokstad J, Bachynski E, Ridder E (2017) Experimental results of a multimode monopile offshore wind turbine support structure subjected to steep and breaking irregular waves. Ocean Eng 146:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang S, Larsen T, Gudmestad O (2018) Parameter Estimate of a Breaking Wave Slamming Load Model using Monte Carlo Simulation. In EERA DeepWind 2018, Trondheim, Norway, January 2018

  16. Xu X (2004) Breaking wave forces on the vertical cylinders. J University Petroleum 28(6):80–82

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Zhang Q, Chen T (2015) Numerical simulation of wave breaking load of monopile. J Waterway and Harbor 3:191–196

    Google Scholar 

  18. Apelt C, Piorewicz J (1987) Laboratory studies of breaking wave forces acting on vertical cylinders in shallow water. Coast Eng 11(3):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bredmose H, Slabiak P, Sahlberg-Nielsen L, Schlutter F (2013) Dynamic Excitation Of Monopiles By Steep And Breaking Waves: Experimental And Numerical Study. In Proceedings of the OMAE2013, Nantes, France

  20. Tang Y, Shi W, Ning D, You J, Constantine M (2020) Effects of spilling and plunging type breaking waves acting on large monopile offshore wind turbines. Front Mar Sci 7:427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaplin J, Rainey R, Yemm R (1997) Ringing of a vertical cylinder in wave. J Fluid Mech 350:119–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Scolan Y, Le M, Chen X, Deleuil G, Ferrant P, Malenica S, Molin B (1997) Some results from numerical and experimental investigations on the high frequency responses of offshore structures. Behaviour of Offshore Structural Conference, Delft, The Netherlands

  23. De Vos L, Frigaard P, De Rouck J (2007) Wave run-up on cylindrical and cone shaped foundations for offshore wind turbines. Coast Eng 54(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao H, Zha J, Wan D (2011) Numerical simulation of wave run-up around a vertical cylinder. In: Proceedings of the 21st ISOPE, Hawaii, USA

  25. Mohseni M, Esperanca PT, Sphaier SH (2018) Numerical study of wave run-up on a fixed and vertical surface-piercing cylinder subjected to regular, non-breaking waves using OpenFOAM. Ocean Eng 79:228–252

    Google Scholar 

  26. Westphalen J, Greaves DM, Williams CJK, Hunt-Raby AC, Zang J (2012) Focused waves and wave–structure interaction in a numerical wave tank. Ocean Eng 45:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kristiansen T, Faltinsen OM (2017) Higher harmonic wave loads on a vertical cylinder in finite water depth. J Fluid Mech 833:773–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang Y, Shi W, You J, Constantine M (2021) Effects of nonlinear wave loads on large monopile offshore wind turbines with and without ice-breaking cone configuration. J Mar Sci Tech 26(1):37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. DNV GL (2017) DNV DNVGL-RP-C205 Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads (2017)

  30. Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W et al (2009) Definition of a 5MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

  31. Robertson A, Wendt F, Jonkman J, et al, (2015) OC5 Project Phase I: Validation of Hydrodynamic Loading on a Fixed Cylinder. The International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference

  32. Battjes JA (1974) Surf similarity. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Coastal Engineering, Denmark

  33. Galvin C (1968) Breaker type classification on three laboratory beaches. J Geophys Res 73(12):3651–3659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Morison J, O’Brien M, Johnson J, Schaaf S (1950) The forces exerted by surface waves on piles. J Petroleum Technol Petroleum Trans AIME 189:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ministry of Transportation and Communications (2013) Code of Hydrology for Sea Harbour, JTS 145-2-2013, China

  36. Von Karman T (1929) The impact on seaplane floats during landing. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Technical Note, vol. 321

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52071058, 51939002). This work is also supported by the international collaboration and exchange program from the NSFC-RCUK/EPSRC with grant No. 51761135011. This work is also partially supported by LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1807208).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Shi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, W., Zhang, S., Michailides, C. et al. Experimental investigation of the hydrodynamic effects of breaking waves on monopiles in model scale. J Mar Sci Technol 28, 314–325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00926-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00926-9

Keywords

Navigation