Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Machine learning for naval architecture, ocean and marine engineering

  • Review article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machine learning (ML)-based techniques have found significant impact in many fields of engineering and sciences, where data-sets are available from experiments and high-fidelity numerical simulations. Those data-sets are generally utilised in a machine learning model to extract information about the underlying physics and derive functional relationships mapping input variables to target quantities of interest. Commonplace machine learning algorithms utilised in scientific machine learning (SciML) include neural networks, support vector machines, regression trees, random forests, etc. The focus of this article is to review the applications of ML in naval architecture, ocean and marine engineering problems; and identify priority directions of research. We discuss the applications of machine learning algorithms for different problems such as wave height prediction, calculation of wind loads on ships, damage detection of offshore platforms, calculation of ship-added resistance and various other applications in coastal and marine environments. The details of the data-sets including the source of data-sets utilised in the ML model development are included. The features used as the inputs to the ML models are presented in detail and finally, the methods employed in optimisation of the ML models were also discussed. Based on this comprehensive analysis, we point out future directions of research that may be fruitful for the application of ML to ocean and marine engineering problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cherkassky Vladimir, Mulier Filip M (2007) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. John Wiley & Sons

  2. Brunton Steven L, Noack Bernd R, Petros Koumoutsakos (2020) Machine learning for fluid mechanics. Ann Rev Fluid Mechan 52:477–508

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartigan John A, Wong Manchek A (1979) Algorithm as 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. J Royal Statist Soc Series C Appl Statisti 28(1):100–108

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antonia Creswell, Tom White, Vincent Dumoulin, Kai Arulkumaran, Biswa Sengupta, Bharath Anil A (2018) Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Proc Magaz 35(1):53–65

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidhuber Jürgen (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks 61:85–117

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beck Andrea, Flad David, Munz Claus-Dieter (2019) Deep neural networks for data-driven les closure models. J Comput Phys 398:108910

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodfellow Ian, Bengio Yoshua, Courville Aaron (2016) Deep learning. MIT press

  8. Choi Heejeong, Park Minsik, Son Gyubin, Jeong Jaeyun, Park Jaesun, Mo Kyounghyun, Kang Pilsung (2020) Real-time significant wave height estimation from raw ocean images based on 2d and 3d deep neural networks. Ocean Eng 201:107129

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leo Breiman (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shan Suthaharan (2016) Support vector machine. In Machine learning models and algorithms for big data classification, pp 207–235, Springer

  11. Smola Alex J, Bernhard Schölkopf (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Statist Comput 14(3):199–222

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukami Kai, Fukagata Koji, Taira Kunihiko (2020) Assessment of supervised machine learning methods for uid ows. Mathemat Soc Sci

  13. Sandhya KG, Balakrishnan Nair TM, Bhaskaran Prasad K, Sabique L, Arun N, Jeykumar K (2014) Wave forecasting system for operational use and its validation at coastal puducherry, east coast of india. Ocean Eng 80:64–72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mafi Somayeh, Amirinia Gholamreza (2017) Forecasting hurricane wave height in gulf of mexico using soft computing methods. Ocean Eng 146:352–362

    Google Scholar 

  15. Etemad-Shahidi A, Javad Mahjoobi (2009) Comparison between m5 model tree and neural networks for prediction of significant wave height in lake superior. Ocean Eng 36(15–16):1175–1181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chandra Deka Paresh, Prahlada R (2012) Discrete wavelet neural network approach in significant wave height forecasting for multistep lead time. Ocean Eng 43:32–42

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Wenxu, Tang Ruichun, Li Cheng, Liu Peishun, Luo Liang (2018) A bp neural network model optimized by mind evolutionary algorithm for predicting the ocean wave heights. Ocean Eng 162:98–107

    Google Scholar 

  18. Law YZ, Santo H, Lim KY, Chan ES (2020) Deterministic wave prediction for unidirectional sea-states in real-time using artificial neural network. Ocean Eng 195:106722

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira PBA, Lotufo ADP, Lopes MLM, Maciel GF (2020) Impact wave predictions by a fuzzy artmap neural network. Ocean Eng 202:107165

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deshmukh Aditya N, Deo MC, Bhaskaran Prasad K, Balakrishnan Nair TM, Sandhya KG (2016) Neural-network-based data assimilation to improve numerical ocean wave forecast. IEEE J Ocean Eng 41(4):944–953

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deo Mc C, Abhay Jha, Chaphekar AS, Ravikant K (2001) Neural networks for wave forecasting. Ocean Eng 28(7):889–898

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deo MC, Sridhar Naidu C (1998) Real time wave forecasting using neural networks. Ocean Eng 26(3):191–203

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bishnupriya Sahoo, Bhaskaran Prasad K (2019) Prediction of storm surge and coastal inundation using artificial neural network-a case study for 1999 odisha super cyclone. Weather Climate Extremes 23:100196

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mandal S, Prabaharan N (2006) Ocean wave forecasting using recurrent neural networks. Ocean Eng 33(10):1401–1410

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai Jen-Chih, Tsai Cheng-Han (2009) Wave measurements by pressure transducers using artificial neural networks. Ocean Eng 36(15–16):1149–1157

    Google Scholar 

  26. Subba Rao, Mandal S (2005) Hindcasting of storm waves using neural networks. Ocean Eng 32(5–6):667–684

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jihee Oh, Suh Kyung-Duck (2018) Real-time forecasting of wave heights using eof-wavelet-neural network hybrid model. Ocean Eng 150:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sundaramoorthy Rajasekaran, Gayathri S, Lee T-L (2008) Support vector regression methodology for storm surge predictions. Ocean Eng 35(16):1578–1587

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iman Malekmohamadi, Reza Bazargan-Lari Mohammad, Reza Kerachian, Reza Nikoo Mohammad, Mahsa Fallahnia (2011) Evaluating the efficacy of svms, bns, anns and anfis in wave height prediction. Ocean Eng 38(2–3):487–497

    Google Scholar 

  30. Doong Dong-Jiing, Peng Jen-Ping, Chen Ying-Chih (2018) Development of a warning model for coastal freak wave occurrences using an artificial neural network. Ocean Eng 169:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tyagi Amit, Sen Debabrata (2006) Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach. Ocean Eng 33(5–6):798–809

    Google Scholar 

  32. Avilash Sahoo, Dwivedy Santosha K, Robi PS (2019) Advancements in the field of autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng 181:145–160

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Jialei, Xiang Xianbo, Zhang Qin, Li Weijia (2020) Neural network-based adaptive trajectory tracking control of underactuated auvs with unknown asymmetrical actuator saturation and unknown dynamics. Ocean Eng 218:108193

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Jianjun, Liu Weidong, Li Le, Li Zeyu et al (2018) The master adaptive impedance control and slave adaptive neural network control in underwater manipulator uncertainty teleoperation. Ocean Eng 165:465–479

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gao Jian, An Xuman, Proctor Alison, Bradley Colin (2017) Sliding mode adaptive neural network control for hybrid visual servoing of underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng 142:666–675

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhenzhong Chu, Daqi Zhu, Jan Gene Eu (2016) Observer-based adaptive neural network control for a class of remotely operated vehicles. Ocean Eng 127:82–89

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tapabrata Ray, Gokarn RP, Sha OP (1996) Neural network applications in naval architecture and marine engineering. Artific Intellig Eng 10(3):213–226

    Google Scholar 

  38. Margari Vasiliki, Kanellopoulou Aphrodite, Zaraphonitis George (2018) On the use of artificial neural networks for the calm water resistance prediction of marad systematic series’ hullforms. Ocean Eng 165:528–537

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cepowski Tomasz (2020) The prediction of ship added resistance at the preliminary design stage by the use of an artificial neural network. Ocean Eng 195:106657

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Xin-Guang, Zou Zao-Jian (2013) Estimation of the hydrodynamic coefficients from captive model test results by using support vector machines. Ocean Eng 73:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  41. Haitong Xu, Guedes Soares C (2019) Hydrodynamic coefficient estimation for ship manoeuvring in shallow water using an optimal truncated ls-svm. Ocean Eng 191:106488

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shuai Yonghui, Guoyuan Li Xu, Cheng Robert Skulstad, Jinshan Xu, Liu Honghai, Zhang Houxiang (2019) An efficient neural-network based approach to automatic ship docking. Ocean Eng 191:106514

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weilin Luo, Lúcia Moreira, Guedes Soares C (2014) Manoeuvring simulation of catamaran by using implicit models based on support vector machines. Ocean Eng 82:150–159

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tang Huang, Yin Yong, Shen Helong (2019) A model for vessel trajectory prediction based on long short-term memory neural network. J Marine Eng Technol, pages 1–10

  45. Volkova Tamara A, Balykina Yulia E, Alexander Bespalov (2021) Predicting ship trajectory based on neural networks using ais data. J Marine Sci Eng 9(3):254

    Google Scholar 

  46. Valčić Marko, Prpić-Oršić Jasna (2016) Hybrid method for estimating wind loads on ships based on elliptic fourier analysis and radial basis neural networks. Ocean Eng 122:227–240

    Google Scholar 

  47. Parkes AI, Sobey AJ, Hudson DA (2018) Physics-based shaft power prediction for large merchant ships using neural networks. Ocean Eng 166:92–104

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gkerekos Christos, Lazakis Iraklis, Theotokatos Gerasimos (2019) Machine learning models for predicting ship main engine fuel oil consumption: A comparative study. Ocean Eng 188:106282

    Google Scholar 

  49. Farag Yasser BA, Ölçer Aykut I (2020) The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ann and regression techniques. Ocean Eng 198:106972

    Google Scholar 

  50. Farag Yasser Bayoumy Abdelwahab (2017) A decision support system for ship’s energy efficient operation: based on artificial neural network method. Thesis

  51. Gkerekos Christos, Lazakis Iraklis (2020) A novel, data-driven heuristic framework for vessel weather routing. Ocean Eng 197:106887

    Google Scholar 

  52. Karagiannidis Pavlos, Themelis Nikos (2021) Data-driven modelling of ship propulsion and the effect of data pre-processing on the prediction of ship fuel consumption and speed loss. Ocean Eng 222:108616

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yuan Zhi, Liu Jingxian, Zhang Qian, Liu Yi, Yuan Yuan, Li Zongzhi (2021) Prediction and optimisation of fuel consumption for inland ships considering real-time status and environmental factors. Ocean Eng 221:108530

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gao Miao, Shi Guo-You (2020) Ship collision avoidance anthropomorphic decision-making for structured learning based on ais with seq-cgan. Ocean Eng 217:107922

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yang Dong, Lingxiao Wu, Wang Shuaian (2021) Can we trust the ais destination port information for bulk ships?-implications for shipping policy and practice. Transport Res Part E Logist Transport Rev 149:102308

    Google Scholar 

  56. Panduranga Kottala, Koley Santanu, Sahoo Trilochan (2021) Surface gravity wave scattering by multiple slatted screens placed near a caisson porous breakwater in the presence of seabed undulations. Appl Ocean Res 111:102675

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kaligatla RB, Manisha Sharma, Trilochan Sahoo (2021) Wave interaction with a pair of submerged floating tunnels in the presence of an array of submerged porous breakwaters. J Offshore Mechan Arctic Eng 143(2):021402

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vijay KG, Neelamani S, Sahoo T, Al-Salem K, Nishad CS (2020) Scattering of gravity waves by a pontoon type breakwater with a series of pervious and impervious skirt walls. Ships and Offshore Structures, pages 1–13

  59. Dong Hyawn Kim and Woo Sun Park (2005) Neural network for design and reliability analysis of rubble mound breakwaters. Ocean Eng 32(11–12):1332–1349

    Google Scholar 

  60. Van Der Meer Jentsje W (1990) Rock slopes and gravel beaches under wave attack. Report

  61. Hyawn Kim Dong, Jin Kim Young, Soo Hur Dong (2014) Artificial neural network based breakwater damage estimation considering tidal level variation. Ocean Eng 87:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chung Minwoong, Kim Seungjun, Lee Kanghyeok et al (2020) Detection of damaged mooring line based on deep neural networks. Ocean Eng 209:107522

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rezaniaiee Aqdam Hamed, Mohammad Ettefagh Mir, Reza Hassannejad (2018) Health monitoring of mooring lines in floating structures using artificial neural networks. Ocean Eng 164:284–297

    Google Scholar 

  64. Prabhu JJ, Nagarajan V, Sunny MR, Sha OP (2017) On the fluid structure interaction of a marine cycloidal propeller. Applied Ocean Research 64:105–127

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kumar S, Nagarajan V, Sha OP (2017) Measurement of flow characteristics in propeller slipstream of a twin propeller twin rudder model ship. Int Shipbuild Prog 63(1–2):1–40

    Google Scholar 

  66. Subhashis Nandy, Vishwanath Nagarajan, Prakash Sha Om (2018) On the heuristic based electronic control of marine cycloidal propeller. Appl Ocean Res 78:134–155

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kumars Mahmoodi, Hassan Ghassemi, Hashem Nowruzi, Mahdi Shora Mohammad (2019) Prediction of the hydrodynamic performance and cavitation volume of the marine propeller using gene expression programming. Ships Offshore Str 14(7):723–736

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mahdi Shora Mohammad, Hassan Ghassemi, Hashem Nowruzi (2018) Using computational fluid dynamic and artificial neural networks to predict the performance and cavitation volume of a propeller under different geometrical and physical characteristics. J Marine Eng Technol 17(2):59–84

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kim Ji-Hye, Lee Hyoungseok, Hur Jea-Wook (2021) A study on the risk of propeller cavitation erosion using convolutional neural network. J Soc Naval Archit Korea 58(3):129–136

    Google Scholar 

  70. Donal Ryan, Hamill Gerard A, Johnston Harold T (2013) Determining propeller induced erosion alongside quay walls in harbours using artificial neural networks. Ocean Eng 59:142–151

    Google Scholar 

  71. Bao Xingxian, Fan Tongxuan, Shi Chen, Yang Guanlan (2021) One-dimensional convolutional neural network for damage detection of jacket-type offshore platforms. Ocean Eng 219:108293

    Google Scholar 

  72. Osama Abdeljaber, Onur Avci, Serkan Kiranyaz, Moncef Gabbouj, Inman Daniel J (2017) Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J Sound Vibrat 388:154–170

    Google Scholar 

  73. Isabel López, Luis Aragonés, Yolanda Villacampa, Patricia Compañ, Satorre R (2015) Morphological classification of microtidal sand and gravel beaches. Ocean Eng 109:309–319

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tan Yanghui, Tian Hui, Jiang Ruizheng, Lin Yejin, Zhang Jundong (2020) A comparative investigation of data-driven approaches based on one-class classifiers for condition monitoring of marine machinery system. Ocean Eng 201:107174

    Google Scholar 

  75. The case of tanker vessels (2017) Aris Pagoropoulos, Anders H Møller, and Tim C McAloone. Applying multi-class support vector machines for performance assessment of shipping operations. Ocean Eng 140:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  76. Taudal Poulsen René, Hannes Johnson (2016) The logic of business vs. the logic of energy management practice: understanding the choices and effects of energy consumption monitoring systems in shipping companies. J Clean Product 112:3785–3797

    Google Scholar 

  77. Le Anh Vu, Phone Thiha Kyaw, Veerajagadheswar Prabakaran, Viraj Muthugala MA, J, Elara Mohan Rajesh, Kumar Madhu, Huu Khanh Nhan Nguyen, (2021) Reinforcement learning-based optimal complete water-blasting for autonomous ship hull corrosion cleaning system. Ocean Eng 220:108477

  78. Sutton Richard S, Barto Andrew G (2018) Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press

  79. Bento PMR, Pombo JAN, Mendes RPG, Calado MRA, Mariano SJPS (2021) Ocean wave energy forecasting using optimised deep learning neural networks. Ocean Eng 219:10837

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mousavi Seyed Milad, Ghasemi Majid, Manshadi Mahsa Dehghan, Mosavi Amir (2021) Providing a prediction model to the output power of a wave en-ergy converter by artificial neural network. Preprint

  81. He Jun (2020) Coherence and cross-spectral density matrix analysis of random wind and wave in deep water. Ocean Eng 197:106930

    Google Scholar 

  82. Vieira Filipe, Taveira-Pinto Francisco, Rosa-Santos Paulo (2021) Novel time-efficient approach to calibrate varans-vof models for simulation of wave interaction with porous structures using artificial neural networks. Ocean Eng 235:109375

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yuwang Xu, Fenerci Aksel, Øiseth Ole, Moan Torgeir (2020) Efficient prediction of wind and wave induced long-term extreme load effects of floating suspension bridges using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Ocean Eng 217:107888

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dripta Sarkar, Osborne Michael A, Adcock Thomas AA (2018) Prediction of tidal currents using bayesian machine learning. Ocean Eng 158:221–231

    Google Scholar 

  85. Immas Alexandre, Do Ninh, Alam Mohammad-Reza (2021) Real-time in situ prediction of ocean currents. Ocean Eng 228:108922

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sumangala Dhanya, Warrior Hari (2020) Coastal modelling incorporating artificial neural networks for improved velocity prediction. ISH J Hydraul Eng, pages 1–11

  87. Sumangala Dhanya, Joshi Apurva, Warrior Hari (2022) Modelling freshwater plume in the bay of bengal with artificial neural networks. Curr Sci (00113891), 123(1)

  88. Prakash Panda Jyoti, Warrior Hari V (2021) Numerical studies on drag reduction of an axisymmetric body of revolution with antiturbulence surface. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 143(6):064501

    Google Scholar 

  89. Mitra A, Panda JP, Warrior HV (2019) The effects of free stream turbulence on the hydrodynamic characteristics of an auv hull form. Ocean Eng 174:148–158

    Google Scholar 

  90. Arindam Mitra, Prakash Panda Jyoti, Vijayan Warrior Hari (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of autonomous underwater vehicles over sea-beds with complex topography. Ocean Eng 198:106978

    Google Scholar 

  91. Piyush Mohapatra, Vijay KG, Anirban Bhattacharyya, Trilochan Sahoo (2021) Performance of a shore fixed oscillating water column device for different bottom slopes and front wall drafts: A study based on computational fluid dynamics and biem. J Offshore Mechan Arctic Eng 143(3):032002

    Google Scholar 

  92. Piyush Mohapatra, Vijay KG, Anirban Bhattacharyya, Trilochan Sahoo (2021) Performance of a shore fixed oscillating water column device for different bottom slopes and front wall drafts: A study based on computational fluid dynamics and biem. J Offshore Mechan Arctic Eng 143(3):032002

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mohapatra Piyush, Sahoo Trilochan (2020) Hydrodynamic performance analysis of a shore fixed oscillating water column wave energy converter in the presence of bottom variations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Maritime Environ 234(1):37–47

    Google Scholar 

  94. ANSYS Fluent. Fluent 14.0 user’s guide. ANSYS FLUENT Inc, 2011

  95. S CD-adapco. Star ccm+ user guide version 12.04. CD-Adapco: New York, NY, USA, 2017

  96. Larsson L, Broberg L, Zhang DH (1989) Shipflow–a cfd system for ship design. In International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Mobile Units (PRADS), 4th, pages 53–65

  97. Vinothkumar Sekar, Qinghua Jiang, Chang Shu, Cheong Khoo Boo (2019) Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach. Phys Fluids 31(5):057103

    Google Scholar 

  98. Hui Xinyu, Bai Junqiang, Wang Hui, Zhang Yang (2020) Fast pressure distribution prediction of airfoils using deep learning. Aerospace Sci Technol 105:105949

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ashwin Renganathan S, Romit Maulik, Vishwas Rao (2020) Machine learning for nonintrusive model order reduction of the parametric inviscid transonic flow past an airfoil. Phys Fluids 32(4):047110

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kong Chen, Chang Juntao, Wang Ziao, Li Yunfei, Bao Wen (2021) Data-driven super-resolution reconstruction of supersonic flow field by convolutional neural networks. AIP Adv 11(6):065321

    Google Scholar 

  101. Kong Chen, Chang Juntao, Li Yunfei, Wang Ziao (2021) A deep learning approach for the velocity field prediction in a scramjet isolator. Phys Fluids 33(2):026103

    Google Scholar 

  102. Lee Sangseung, You Donghyun (2021) Analysis of a convolutional neural network for predicting unsteady volume wake flow fields. Phys Fluids 33(3):035152

    Google Scholar 

  103. Hasegawa Kazuto, Fukami Kai, Murata Takaaki, Fukagata Koji (2020) Machine-learning-based reduced-order modeling for unsteady flows around bluff bodies of various shapes. Theoret Comput Fluid Dynam 34(4):367–383

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  104. Nakamura Taichi, Fukami Kai, Hasegawa Kazuto, Nabae Yusuke, Fukagata Koji (2021) Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory based reduced order surrogate for minimal turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids 33(2):025116

    Google Scholar 

  105. Leer Michael, Kempf Andreas (2021) Fast flow field estimation for various applications with a universally applicable machine learning concept. Flow Turbul Combust 107(1):175–200

    Google Scholar 

  106. Sun Luning, Gao Han, Pan Shaowu, Wang Jian-Xun (2020) Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:112732

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  107. Ali Kashefi, Davis Rempe, Guibas Leonidas J (2021) A point-cloud deep learning framework for prediction of fluid flow fields on irregular geometries. Phys Fluids 33(2):027104

    Google Scholar 

  108. Moin Parviz, Kim John (1997) Tackling turbulence with supercomputers. Scient Am 276(1):62–68

    Google Scholar 

  109. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  110. Speziale Charles G (1991) Analytical methods for the development of reynolds-stress closures in turbulence. Ann Rev Fluid Mechan 23(1):107–157

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  111. Speziale Charles G, Gatski Thomas B, Mac Giolla Mhuiris Nessan (1990) A critical comparison of turbulence models for homogeneous shear flows in a rotating frame. Physf Fluids A Fluid Dynam 2(9):1678–1684

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. Ananda Mishra Aashwin, Karthik Duraisamy, Gianluca Iaccarino (2019) Estimating uncertainty in homogeneous turbulence evolution due to coarse-graining. Phys Fluids 31(2):025106

    Google Scholar 

  113. Ananda Mishra Aashwin, Sharath Girimaji (2019) Linear analysis of non-local physics in homogeneous turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 31(3):035102

    Google Scholar 

  114. Launder BE, Reece G Jr, Rodi W (1975) Progress in the development of a reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mechan 68(3):537–566

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  115. Speziale Charles G, Sutanu Sarkar, Gatski Thomas B (1991) Modelling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence:an invariant dynamical systems approach. J Fluid Mechan 227:245–272

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  116. Sutanu Sarkar, Speziale Charles G (1990) A simple nonlinear model for the return to isotropy in turbulence. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dynam 2(1):84–93

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  117. Mishra Aashwin A, Girimaji Sharath S (2013) Intercomponent energy transfer in incompressible homogeneous turbulence:multi-point physics and amenability to one-point closures. J Fluid Mechan 731:639–681

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  118. Mishra Aashwin A, Girimaji Sharath S (2017) Toward approximating non-local dynamics in single-point pressure-strain correlation closures. J Fluid Mechan 811:168–188

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  119. Mishra Aashwin A, Girimaji Sharath S (2010) Pressure-strain correlation modeling: towards achieving consistency with rapid distortion theory. Flow Turbulence Combust 85(3–4):593–619

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  120. Mishra Aashwin A, Girimaji Sharath S (2014) On the realizability of pressure-strain closures. J Fluid Mechan 755:535–560

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  121. Jiménez Javier (2018) Machine-aided turbulence theory. J Fluid Mechan, 854

  122. Duraisamy Karthikeyan, Zhang Ze J, Singh Anand Pratap (2015) New approaches in turbulence and transition modeling using data-driven techniques. In 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, page 1284

  123. Pratap Singh Anand, Shivaji Medida, Karthik Duraisamy (2017) Machine-learning-augmented predictive modeling of turbulent separated flows over airfoils. AIAA J 55(7):2215–2227

    Google Scholar 

  124. Ling Julia, Kurzawski Andrew, Templeton Jeremy (2016) Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance. J Fluid Mechan 807:155–166

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  125. Snoek Jasper, Larochelle Hugo, Adams Ryan P (2012) Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst, 25

  126. Wang Jian-Xun, Jin-Long Wu, Xiao Heng (2017) Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on dns data. Phys Rev Fluids 2(3):034603

    Google Scholar 

  127. Jin-Long Wu, Xiao Heng, Paterson Eric (2018) Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework. Phys Rev Fluids 3(7):074602

    Google Scholar 

  128. Kaandorp Mikael LA, Dwight Richard P (2020) Data-driven modelling of the reynolds stress tensor using random forests with invariance. Comput Fluids, 202:104497

  129. Zhu Linyang, Zhang Weiwei, Sun Xuxiang, Liu Yilang, Yuan Xianxu (2021) Turbulence closure for high reynolds number airfoil flows by deep neural networks. Aerospace Sci Technol 110:106452

    Google Scholar 

  130. Panda JP, Warrior HV (2021) Modelling the pressure strain correlation in turbulent flows using deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00907

  131. Panda JP, Warrior HV (2018) A representation theory-based model for the rapid pressure strain correlation of turbulence. J Fluid Eng 140(8):081101

    Google Scholar 

  132. Panda Jyoti Prakash, Mitra Arindam, Warrior Hari V (2020) A review on the hydrodynamic characteristics of autonomous underwater vehicles. Proce Institut Mech Eng Part M J Eng Maritime Environ, page 1475090220936896

  133. Panda JP, Warrior HV (2021) Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for predictive reynolds stress transport modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13641

  134. Wang Zhuo, Luo Kun, Li Dong, Tan Junhua, Fan Jianren (2018) Investigations of data-driven closure for subgrid-scale stress in large-eddy simulation. Phys Fluids 30(12):125101

    Google Scholar 

  135. Yuan Zelong, Xie Chenyue, Wang Jianchun (2020) Deconvolutional artificial neural network models for large eddy simulation of turbulence. Phys Fluids 32(11):115106

    Google Scholar 

  136. Xie Chenyue, Yuan Zelong, Wang Jianchun (2020) Artificial neural network-based nonlinear algebraic models for large eddy simulation of turbulence. Phys Fluids 32(11):115101

    Google Scholar 

  137. Xinyue Hu, Haoji Hu, Verma Saurabh, Zhang Zhi-Li (2020) Physics-guided deep neural networks for power flow analysis. IEEE Transact Power Syst 36(3):2082–2092

    Google Scholar 

  138. Baker Nathan, Alexander Frank, Bremer Timo, Hagberg Aric, Kevrekidis Yannis, Najm Habib, Parashar Manish, Patra Abani, Sethian James, Wild Stefan et al (2019) Workshop report on basic research needs for scientific machine learning: Core technologies for artificial intelligence. Technical report, USDOE Office of Science (SC), Washington, DC (United States)

  139. Shehtab Zaman M (2020) Scientific Deep Learning: Deep Learning for Quantum Physics. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Binghamton

  140. Arun Shantaram Hegde (2020) Quantifying the agreement between computational models and experimental data under uncertainty. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea

    J P PANDA

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, DIT University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

    J P PANDA

Authors
  1. J P PANDA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J P PANDA.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

PANDA, J.P. Machine learning for naval architecture, ocean and marine engineering. J Mar Sci Technol 28, 1–26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-022-00914-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-022-00914-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation