Skip to main content
Log in

Fast trimaran anti-longitudinal motion control system based on active disturbance rejection control with controller tuning

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an enhanced ADRC (active disturbance rejection control) controller which compensates for the wave-induced disturbance is proposed for the fast trimaran longitudinal motion problem. To minimize the ship longitudinal motion in the presence of wave-induced force and moment, based on the estimation and compensation of internal dynamics and external disturbances by extended state observer (ESO), heave-loop motion controller and pitch-loop motion controller are designed via ADRC. Moreover, controller parameters are optimized via a novel Levy flight-based ant colony algorithm (LACA). Numerical simulation and experiment under different sea conditions was conducted to validate the proposed method, and the results showed that effectiveness of the proposed motion controller in improving the seakeeping performance of trimaran.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertorello C, Bruzzone D, Cassella P et al. (2001) Trimaran model test results and comparison with different high speed craft. 1:143–149

  2. Lavroff J, Davis MR, Holloway DS et al (2017) Wave impact loads on wave-piercing trimarans. Ocean Eng 131:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brizzolara S, Bruzzone D (2008) Hydrodynamic optimisation of high-speed trimaran hull forms

  4. Ming-Chung F, Tse-Yin C (2008) A parametric study of wave loads on trimaran ships traveling in waves. Ocean Eng 35(89):749–762

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews DJ, Zhang JW (2009) Trimaran ships: the configuration for the frigate of the future. Naval Eng J 107(3):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Lu X-P, Zhan J-L (2011) New development on the investigation of high speed trimaran hydrodynamics and hull form. J Ship Mech 15(7):813–826

    Google Scholar 

  7. De La Cruz JM, Aranda J, Giron-Sierra JM et al (2004) Improving the comfort of a fast ferry. IEEE Control Syst Mag 24(2):47–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mcvicar J, Lavroff J, Davis M et al (2018) Fluid-structure interaction simulation of slam-induced bending in large high-speed wave-piercing trimarans. J Fluids Struct 82:35–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Q, Lin Z, Guo Z (2013) Theoretical analysis and simulation on anti-rolling effect of trimaran fitted T foil. J Central South Univ

  10. Mansoori M, Fernandes AC (2015) Hydrodynamics of the interceptor on a 2-D flat plate by CFD and experiments. J Hydrodyn (Ser B) 27(6):919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Esteban S, Giron-Sierra JM, Andres-Toro BD et al (2005) Fast ships models for seakeeping improvement studies using flaps and T-foil. Math Comput Model 41(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Esteban S, Andres-toro B, Besada-Portas E (2002) Multi-objective Control of Flaps and T-foil in High-Speed Ships. In: Proceedings IFAC 2002 World Congress, pp 14–20

  13. Han J (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56(3):900–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Y, Han J (2000) Analysis and design for the second order nonlinear continuous extended states observer. Chin Sci Bull 45(21):1938–1944

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao Z (2003) Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New York, pp 4989–4996

  16. Chen MS (2012) Design and research of high precision single gimbal control moment gyro gimbal servo system. Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  17. Gao Z (2013) On the foundation of active disturbance rejection control. Control Theory Appl 30(12):1498–1510

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhaohu L, Yingjie Z, Jing Z et al (2011) Active disturbance rejection control of a chaotic system based on immune binary-state particle swarm optimization algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica 60(1):791–799

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li J, Wu C, Li S et al (2014) Optimal disturbance rejection control approach based on a compound neural network prediction method. J Process Control 24(10):1516–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li P-y, Qiu Y-m, Gu M-t (2002) Study of trimaran wavemaking resistance with numerical calculation and experiments. J Hydrodyn (Ser B) 14(2):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Z, Lin Z, Yang Q et al (2012) Research of combined control scheme for fast catamaran motion control using T-foils and interceptors. Int J Intell Eng Syst 5(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han JQ (2002) From PID technique to active disturbances rejection control technique. Basic Autom

  23. Kamaruzaman AF, Zain AM, Yusuf SM et al (2013) Levy flight algorithm for optimization problems—a literature review. Appl Mech Mater 421:496–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandelbrot BB, Wheeler JA (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. J R Stat Soc 147(4):468

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In: 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC). IEEE

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Ma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Zhu, Q. Fast trimaran anti-longitudinal motion control system based on active disturbance rejection control with controller tuning. J Mar Sci Technol 27, 1045–1064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-022-00882-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-022-00882-w

Keywords

Navigation