Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analytical and numerical biaxial bending analysis of deepwater riser due to vortex-induced vibration

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies of analysis and prediction of marine risers responses usually focus on vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of cross-flow (CF) direction rather than in-line (IL). Recent studies show that responses of IL direction tend to dominate in some cases. Responses of long riser due to biaxial bending of IL and CF VIV are investigated. Closed-form formulas are derived for estimating maximum normal stress due to the biaxial moment of CF/IL VIV and relations for estimating biaxial stress using CF values are presented. Analytical results are compared with numerical results of the time domain model and a good correlation is observed. It is shown that for tension and bending-controlled modes of vibration if the ratio of displacement amplitude of IL to CF direction is, respectively, higher than 0.22 and 0.35, normal stress due to biaxial bending is noticeably more than one directional (CF) bending stress. For a case study, the maximum biaxial stress along the riser is about 20 and 40% higher than the maximum CF stress along the length of the riser for bending and tension-controlled modes of vibration, respectively. Such results can be important not only directly in design issues, but also they may be noticeable in fatigue analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

Cylinder outer diameter

EI :

Bending stiffness of riser

L and A :

Length and cross-sectional area of the riser

U :

Current velocity

\(F_{z}\) :

The axial force in the longitudinal direction

m :

Sum of structure mass and added fluid mass per unit length

ρ :

Fluid density

\(C_{{{\text{L}}0}}\) and \(C_{{{\text{D}}0}}\) :

Amplitude of fluctuating lift and drag coefficients for a fixed rigid cylinder subjected to vortex shedding

c and \(c^{\prime}\) :

Damping coefficients due to structure and hydrodynamic forces, respectively

St :

Strouhal number

γ :

Stall parameter determined through experiment

\(x_{0} , \, y_{0}\) :

Displacement amplitude of IL and CF direction, respectively

\(n_{{{\text{IL}}}} , \, n_{{{\text{CF}}}}\) :

Mode number IL and CF direction

\(\phi\) :

Phase between IL and CF motions

\(\sigma_{{{\text{CF}}}}\), \(\sigma_{{{\text{IL}}}}\) and \(\sigma_{\theta }\) :

Longitudinal stress due to CF and IL vibration and combination of these at a point with angle of \(\theta\)

\(\varepsilon_{{{\text{IL}}}} ,\varepsilon_{{{\text{CF}}}} ,A_{{{\text{IL}}}} ,A_{{{\text{CF}}}}\) :

Nondimensional parameters estimated through experiment

\(\omega\) :

CF vibration frequency

\(Y_{{{\text{rms}}}}\) :

Standard deviation of the anti-node displacement in diameters

\(q_{{{\text{IL}}}}\) and \(q_{{{\text{CF}}}}\) :

Wake parameters of IL and CF direction, respectively

\(\Omega_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Strouhal frequency

β and γ :

Integration parameters

\(M_{{{\text{CF}}}}\), \(M_{{{\text{IL}}}}\) :

Bending moments caused by IL and CF vibration, respectively

\(\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O}},{\text{CF}}}}\), \(\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O,IL}}}}\) and \(\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O}}}}\) :

Overall maximum stress due to CF bending, IL bending and biaxial bending, respectively

\(\sigma_{\max ,N}\) :

Maximum stress at each node of riser

\(z_{\sigma \max ,O}\), \(\theta_{{\sigma \max ,{\text{O}}}}\) :

Height and angle of critical point along the overall length of riser

\(\theta_{\max }\) :

Angle of critical point at each node

DAR:

Displacement amplitude ratios (\({{x_{0} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{x_{0} } {y_{0} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {y_{0} }}\))

OSR:

Overall stress ratio (\({{\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O}}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O}}}} } {\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O}},{\text{CF}}}} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\sigma_{{\max ,{\text{O}},{\text{CF}}}} }}\))

References

  1. Sarpkaya T (1979) Vortex-induced oscillations: a selective review. J Appl Mech 46:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Griffin OM, Ramberg SE (1982) Some recent studies of vortex shedding with application to marine tubulars and risers. J Energy Res Technol 104:2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bearman PW (1984) Vortex shedding from oscillating bluff bodies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 16:195–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parkinson G (1989) Phenomena and modelling of flow-induced vibrations of bluff bodies. Prog Aerosp Sci 26:169–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarpkaya T (2004) A critical review of the intrinsic nature of vortex-induced vibrations. J Fluids Struct 19:389–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williamson CHK, Govardhan R (2004) Vortex-induced vibrations. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:413–455

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Williamson CHK, Govardhan R (2008) A brief review of recent results in vortex-induced vibrations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:713–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vandiver JK, Jong J-Y (1987) The relationship between in-line and cross-flow vortex-induced vibration of cylinders. J Fluids Struct 1:381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeon D, Gharib M (2001) On circular cylinders undergoing two-degree-of-freedom forced motions. J Fluids Struct 15:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jauvtis N, Williamson CHK (2004) The effect of two degrees of freedom on vortex-induced vibration at low mass and damping. J Fluid Mech 509:23–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004008778

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Blevins RD, Coughran CS (2009) Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration in one and two dimensions with variable mass, damping, and Reynolds number. J Fluids Eng 131:101202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin D, Larsen CM (2011) Experimental and numerical analysis of forced motion of a circular cylinder. In: ASME 2011 30th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, OMAE2011, June 19, 2011–June 24, 2011. pp 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2011-49438

  13. Kang Z, Jia L-S (2013) An experimental investigation of one-and two-degree of freedom VIV of cylinders. Acta Mech Sin 29:284–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Komachi Y, Mazaheri S, Tabeshpour MR (2017) The effect of shifting natural frequency on the reduction of vortex-induced vibrations of marine risers. Int J Coast Offshore Eng 1(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sümer BM, Fredsoe J (2006) Hydrodynamics around cylindrical structures, revised edition

  16. Tognarelli MA, Slocum ST, Frank WR, Campbell RB et al (2004) VIV response of a long flexible cylinder in uniform and linearly sheared currents. In: Offshore technology conference

  17. Trim AD, Braaten H, Lie H, Tognarelli MA (2005) Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration of long marine risers. J Fluids Struct 21:335–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xue H, Tang W, Qu X (2014) Prediction and analysis of fatigue damage due to cross-flow and in-line VIV for marine risers in non-uniform current. Ocean Eng 83:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baarholm GS, Larsen CM, Lie H (2006) On fatigue damage accumulation from in-line and cross-flow vortex-induced vibrations on risers. J Fluids Struct 22:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Larsen CM, Bech A (1986) Stress analysis of marine risers under lock-in condition. In: Proceedings of the fifth international offshore mechanics and arctic engineering symposium, Tokyo, Japan, pp 450–457

  21. Komachi Y, Mazaheri S, Tabeshpour MR (2017) Wake and structure model for simulation of cross-flow/in-line vortex induced vibration of marine risers. J Vibroeng 20(1):152–164

    Google Scholar 

  22. Postnikov A, Pavlovskaia E, Wiercigroch M (2017) 2DOF CFD calibrated wake oscillator model to investigate vortex-induced vibrations. Int J Mech Sci 127:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurushina V, Pavlovskaia E (2018) Fluid nonlinearities effect on wake oscillator model performance. In: MATEC web of conferences

  24. Senjanović I, Ljuština AM, Parunov J (2006) Natural vibration analysis of tensioned risers by segmentation method. Oil Gas Sci Technol Revue de l’IFP 61(5):647–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sparks C (2002) Transverse modal vibrations of vertical tensioned risers. A simplified analytical approach. Oil Gas Sci Technol 57(1):71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pesce CP, Martins CA (2005) Numerical computation of riser dynamics. In: WIT transactions on state-of-the-art in science and engineering, vol 18

  27. Dahl JM, Hover FS, Triantafyllou MS, Oakley OH (2010) Dual resonance in vortex-induced vibrations at subcritical and supercritical Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 643:395–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Triantafyllou MS, Hover FS, Techet AH, Yue DKP (2003) Vortex-induced vibrations of slender structures in shear flow. In: IUTAM symposium on integrated modelling of fully coupled fluid structure interactions using analysis, computations and experiments. Springer, pp 313–327

  29. Birkhoff G, Zarantonello E (1957) Jets, wakes and cavities, vol 330. p 115

  30. Gu J, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Duan M, Levi C (2013) Analytical solution of mean top tension of long flexible riser in modeling vortex-induced vibrations. Appl Ocean Res 41:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Facchinetti ML, de Langre E, Biolley F (2004) Coupling of structure and wake oscillators in vortex-induced vibrations. J Fluids Struct 19(2):123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Blevins RD (1990) Flow-induced vibrations. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Currie IG, Turnbull DH (1987) Streamwise oscillations of cylinders near the critical Reynolds number. J Fluids Struct 1(2):185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vandiver JK et al (1983) Drag coefficients of long flexible cylinders. In: Offshore technology conference

  35. Chaplin JR, Bearman PW, Cheng Y, Fontaine E, Graham JMR, Herfjord K, Huarte FJH, Isherwood M, Lambrakos K, Larsen CM et al (2005) Blind predictions of laboratory measurements of vortex-induced vibrations of a tension riser. J Fluids Struct 21:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. The Mathworks Inc. (2010) Matlab, R2010b [computer program]

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to pay special thankfulness, warmth, and appreciation to Dr. Payman Rahmatabadi (Maning Director of Fan Omran Pars Co.) for his valuable guidance and supporting us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Tabeshpour.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabeshpour, M.R., Komachi, Y. Analytical and numerical biaxial bending analysis of deepwater riser due to vortex-induced vibration. J Mar Sci Technol 27, 492–507 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00846-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00846-6

Keywords

Navigation