Skip to main content
Log in

The scale effects on the open water performance of a pump-jet propulsor

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the scale effects on the open water performance of a pump-jet propulsor (PJP) with pre-swirl stator are considered and implemented based on systematic numerical calculations. With considering the effects of mesh density and time-step size, the unsteady open water performance at the design advance coefficient both in full scale and model scale is first discussed. Then, the scale effects on open water performance are discussed and quantified. For further understandings, the pressure, velocity field and vortical structures are analyzed. Results indicate that different components of PJP demonstrate different scale effects on open water performance. The rotor shows more pronounced scale effects on high advance coefficients, and its thrust coefficient obtains the improvements in full scale at all operating conditions while the scale effects on its torque coefficient are affected by the advance coefficient. For the duct and stator, they exhibit decreases in thrust coefficient in full scale, and the torque coefficient of stator also decreases. Compared with the model scale, the flow on PJP shows significant differences in full scale. The pre-swirl effects of stator are enhanced, resulting in the lower fluctuation degree of rotor thrust at the design operating point. The stator wake, rotor wake, and tip clearance leakage flow show fewer effects on the outflow of duct. The flow separation on the duct outside is significantly weakened. The tip clearance leakage flow is considerably strengthened, but its development is also more significantly restrained by the higher velocity mainstream together with the shrinkage of duct in the rotor downstream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article, and additional data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ch Suryanarayana B, Ramji SK, Saiju A (2010) Experimental evaluation of pumpjet propulsor for an axi-symmetric body in wind tunnel. Int J Naval Architecture Ocean Eng 2(1):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suryanarayana Ch, Satyanarayana B, Ramji K (2010) Performance evaluation of an underwater body and pumpjet by model testing in cavitation tunnel. Int J Naval Architecture Ocean Eng 2(2):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suryanarayana Ch, Satyanarayana B, Ramji K, Nageswara Rao M (2010) Cavitation studies on axi-symmetric underwater body with pumpjet propulsor in cavitation tunnel. Int J Naval Architecture Ocean Eng 2(4):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stefan I (2001) Hydrodynamic simulation of a torpedo with pumpjet propulsion system. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talezade SA, Reza NM, Dehghan MM (2019) Numerical and experimental investigation of the fluid flow on a full-scale pump jet thruster. Ocean Eng 182:527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi Y, Pan G, Huang Q, Du X (2015) Numerical simulation of cavitation characteristics for pump-jet propeller. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 640, page 012035. IOP Publishing

  7. Pan GL, Lin S, Prasanta K (2016) Numerical simulation of unsteady cavitating flows of pumpjet propulsor. Ships Offshore Struct 11(1):64–74

  8. Mehran Motallebi-Nejad, Mohammad Bakhtiari, Hassan Ghassemi, Manouchehr Fadavie (2017) Numerical analysis of ducted propeller and pumpjet propulsion system using periodic computational domain. J Marine Sci Technol 22(3):559–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han Li, Qiaogao Huang, Guang Pan, Xinguo Dong (2020) The transient prediction of a pre-swirl stator pump-jet propulsor and a comparative study of hybrid rans/les simulations on the wake vortices. Ocean Eng 203:107224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chao Wang, Kaiqiang Weng, Chunyu Guo, Lang Gu (2019) Prediction of hydrodynamic performance of pump propeller considering the effect of tip vortex. Ocean Eng 171:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Denghui Qin, Guang Pan, Qiaogao Huang, Zhengdong Zhang, Jiujiu Ke (2018) Numerical investigation of different tip clearances effect on the hydrodynamic performance of pumpjet propulsor. Int J Comput Methods 15(05):1850037

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Han Li, Guang Pan, Qiaogao Huang (2019) Transient analysis of the fluid flow on a pumpjet propulsor. Ocean Eng 191:106520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haiting Yu, Zhenguo Zhang, Hongxing Hua (2019) Numerical investigation of tip clearance effects on propulsion performance and pressure fluctuation of a pump-jet propulsor. Ocean Eng 192:106500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang C, Weng K, Guo C, Chang X, Gu L (2019) Analysis of influence of duct geometrical parameters on pump jet propulsor hydrodynamic performance. J Marine Sci Technol 1–18

  15. Haiting Y, Ningyuan D, Hongxing H, Zhenguo Z (2020) Propulsion performance and unsteady forces of a pump-jet propulsor with different pre-swirl stator parameters. Appl Ocean Res 100:102184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vladimir Krasilnikov, Jiaying Sun, Henning Halse Karl (2009) Cfd investigation in scale effect on propellers with different magnitude of skew in turbulent flow. In: The first international symposium on marine propulsors, Trondheim, pp 25–40

  17. Hasuike N, Okazaki M, Okazaki A, Fujiyama K (2017) Scale effects of marine propellers in pot and self-propulsion test conditions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP, volume 17

  18. Shuai Sun, Chao Wang, Chunyu Guo, Yuan Zhang, Cong Sun, Pengfei Liu (2020) Numerical study of scale effect on the wake dynamics of a propeller. Ocean Eng 196:106810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sánchez-Caja A, González-Adalid J, Pérez-Sobrino M, Tuomas S (2014) Scale effects on tip loaded propeller performance using a ranse solver. Ocean Eng 88:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao-Qian D, Wei L, Chen-Jun Y, Francis N (2018) Ranse-based simulation and analysis of scale effects on open-water performance of the pptc-ii benchmark propeller. J Ocean Eng Sci 3(3):186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keun WS, Poul A (2017) Cfd analysis of scale effects on conventional and tip-modified propellers. In Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adrian L (2019) Scale effects on a tip rake propeller working in open water. J Marine Sci Eng 7(11):404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rijpkema D, Vaz G (2011) Viscous flow computations on propulsors: verification, validation and scale effects. Proceedings of the Developments in Marine CFD

  24. Anirban B, Vladimir K, Sverre S (2016) A cfd-based scaling approach for ducted propellers. Ocean Eng 123:116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhattacharyya A, Krasilnikov V, Steen S (2015) Scale effects on a 4-bladed propeller operating in ducts of different design in open water. In Proceedings of the Forth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors SMP, volume 15

  26. Anirban Bhattacharyya, Vladimir Krasilnikov, Sverre Steen (2016) Scale effects on open water characteristics of a controllable pitch propeller working within different duct designs. Ocean Eng 112:226–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P (1988) Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows

  28. Menter FR (1993) Zonal two equation kw turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In 24th fluid dynamics, plasmadynamics, and lasers conference, page 2906

  29. Menter Florian R (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Menter Florian R, Martin Kuntz, Robin Langtry (2003) Ten years of industrial experience with the sst turbulence model. Turbulence Heat Mass Transf 4(1):625–632

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under [Grant No. 51979226 and 51879220], and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under [Grant No. 3102019HHZY030019 and 3102020HHZY030018].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiaogao Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Huang, Q., Pan, G. et al. The scale effects on the open water performance of a pump-jet propulsor. J Mar Sci Technol 27, 348–367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00838-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00838-6

Keywords

Navigation