Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Task-centric method for shipyard hoisting process modelling and its application in CAPP

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shipyard hoisting process is a project type manufacturing process which entails more sophisticated elements and relationships than other kinds of processes, this feature brings particular challenges when constructing a structured description of the process, called enterprise model, to introduce various Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) technologies. However, most of the modelling methods devised so far do not consider the individual demand of project type manufacturing process. Therefore, we envisage the necessity to expand, extend, and refactor current methodologies in order to exploit this remaining dimension. In this line, we present a dedicated method aiming at appropriately modelling the project type manufacturing process, it employs seven collaborative views and task-centric idea to emphasize work flow abstraction without sticking to the material flow abstraction as current methods do, which is the key factor to successfully achieve horizontal functions/organizations integration and vertical management hierarchies integration for this special process. The proposed method adopts semi-formal meta model to interpret its framework, building blocks and constraints graphically and rigorously. All these works are performed taking shipyard hoisting process as example. According to the modelling method, a two-stage Computer Aided Process Planning (CAPP) method is also initiated to demonstrate how the process model can serve as the bridge to converge manufacturing technology and information technology. Furthermore, a CAPP prototype is developed to carry out case study with an actual shipyard hoisting process. The study reveals promising contributions to not only enhancing the industrial competitiveness but also enriching the enterprise modelling research on project type manufacturing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

CAD:

Computer aided design

CAE:

Computer aided engineering

CAPP:

Computer aided process planning

CIM block:

Computer integrated manufacturing

DFD:

Data flow diagram

ERP:

Enterprise resource planning

MBOM MBOM:

Manufacturing bill of material

MES:

Manufacturing execution system

PDM:

Product data management

P/E:

Pre-erection block

PPR-S:

Product, process, resource and schedule

PPR3-S:

Product, process, 3 sub-resource and schedule

RASCI:

Responsible, authorize, support, check, inform

T-PARS:

Task, product, activity, resource and schedule

WBS:

Work breakdown structure

References

  1. Zhang, HL (2010) Research on Hoisting Technology of Hull Blocks. Master dissertation, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

  2. Shannon K, Housel TJ, Jansen E, and Silkey T (2012) Benchmarking Dutch and U.S. Naval Shipbuilding: Reducing U.S. Naval Shipbuilding Costs Using Collaborative PLM and 3D Imaging. Naval Postgraduate School Sponsored Report

  3. Kim JH (2008) Automation and robotization of production processes in shipbuilding. In: Poster presentation at the 2008 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems for the IEEE, Seoul

  4. Lee DH (2014) Robots in the shipbuilding industry. Robot Comput Integr Manufact 30(5):442–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2014.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuji, Sugitani (2004) The Technical Trends and the Future Prospective of the Shipbuilding Industries in Japan. In: Proceeding of the 5th Annual Assembly of the International Institute of Welding (IIW), Osaka, pp 1–12

  6. Stanić V, Hadjina M, Fafandjel N (2018) Toward shipbuilding 40-an industry 40 changing the face of the shipbuilding industry. Brodogradnja 69–3:111–128. https://doi.org/10.21278/brod69307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andritsos F, Perez JP (2000) The automation and integration of production processes in shipbuilding.” European Commission, Joint Research Center

  8. Agarwala CN, Chaudhary RD (2019) Growth of Shipbuilding in China: The Science, Technology, and Innovation route. Institute of Chinese Studies, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vallespir BD, Yves P (2018) Enterprise modelling: from early languages to models transformation. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2878–2896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1418985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merchant ME (1990) World trends of importance to intelligent robotic cim systems. Robot Comput Integr Manufact 7(34):255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-5845(90)90010-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laengle S, Modak NM, Merigó JM, De LS (2018) Thirty years of the international journal of computer integrated manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Comput Integr Manufact. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1529434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zaborowski M (2016) Generalization and Composition-Relationships between Objects of Enterprise Process Control Systems. In Proceedings of the 11th Scientific Conference Internet in the Information Society, pp 405-418

  13. Mertins K, Roland J (2001) Integrated enterprise modelling: a method for the management of change. Prod Plann Control 12(2):9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280150501248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernus P, Nemes L (1996) A framework to define a generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology. Comput Integr Manufact Syst 9(3):179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951(96)00001-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZVEI (2015) The reference architectural model industry 4.0 (RAMI 4.0). https://www.zvei.org/en/subjects/industrie-4-0/the-reference-architectural-model-rami-40-and-the-industrie-40-component/

  16. Koenig PC, Macdonald PL, Lamb T, Dougherty J (1997) The national shipbuilding research program. Ship production symposium, paper number 16: towards a generic product-oriented work breakdown structure for shipbuilding. The National Shipbuilding Research Program

  17. Han SD, Ryu CH, Shin JG, Lee JK (2008) Modeling and simulation of ship panel-block assembly line using Petri nets. Trans Soc CAD/CAM Eng 13(1):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu GZ, Kai X, Yong Z (2011) Modeling and analysis of panel hull block assembly system through timed colored petri net. Mar Struct 24(4):570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo JH, Lee KK, Jung HR, Kwon YD, Shin JG (2005) A framework of plant simulation for a construction of a digital shipyard. J Soc Naval Arch Korea 42(2):165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen H, Nam S, Ju S, Sung S, Shin JG, and Nam JH (2017) Design of an Integrated Production Planning System Framework Based on Simulation Using a Production Information Model. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, San Francisco, pp 813–820

  21. Nam JH, Lee JH, Woo JH (2016) Construction of standardized data structure for simulation of mid-term scheduling of shipbuilding process. Int J Comput Integr Manufact 29(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1066031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim Y, Woo JH, Jeong YK, Shin JG (2018) Computational shipyard dynamics. J Ship Prod Des 34(4):355–367. https://doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.170029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Groover Mikell P (2011) Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing. Prentice Hall Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cha JH, Roh MI, Lee KY (2010) Integrated simulation framework for the process planning of ships and offshore structures. Robot Comput Integr Manufact 26(5):430–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ha S, Ku NK, Roh MI, Hwang HJ (2015) Multibody system dynamics simulator for process simulation of ships and offshore plants in shipyards. Adv Eng Softw 85(jul):12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ku N, Ha S (2014) Dynamic response analysis of heavy load lifting operation in shipyard using multi-cranes. Ocean Eng 83(2):63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cabanillas C, Resinas M, and Ruiz CA (2011) Mixing RASCI matrices and BPMN together for responsibility management. VII Jornadas en Ciencia e Ingeniería de Servicios 2011: 1167. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4769.6960

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the International Exchange Program of Harbin Engineering University for Innovation-oriented Talents Cultivation. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Computer-Aided Systems and Production Engineering Research Lab. for discussion and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Bldg. Chuanhai, No. 145 Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang Province, China

    Mindong Liu & Mei Meng

  2. Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Bldg. 34, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Korea

    Jong Gye Shin

  3. China Shipbuilding Trading Co., Ltd, Bldg.1, No.9 Shouti South Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China

    Mingchao Tang

Authors
  1. Mindong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mei Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jong Gye Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingchao Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mindong Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Meng, M., Shin, J.G. et al. Task-centric method for shipyard hoisting process modelling and its application in CAPP. J Mar Sci Technol 26, 792–811 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00772-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00772-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation