Coupling time-domain analysis for pipeline end termination installation based on pipelaying

Abstract

To study the dynamic characteristics of the pipeline end termination (PLET) installation operation based on pipelaying under full coupling effect, a numerical model for PLET installation based on S-laying with the vessel–cable–PLET–pipeline coupling in time domain is proposed in this study. The whole model mainly consists of four parts, which are the pipelaying vessel, the abandonment and recovery (A&R) cable, the pipeline and the PLET. The finite element method is proposed for the pipeline and the cable, while the hydrodynamic forces on the PLET are simulated by the Morison equation. The pipelaying vessel is controlled by a dynamic positioning system. The proposed model is validated by OrcaFlex software and then used to carry out numerical simulations of PLET installation based on practical operations. The static and dynamic responses of each part in different operation phases and under different wave and current directions are analyzed. The results show that the PLET position in different phases as well as the direction of wave and current during installation has great effect on forces and motions of the system parts. Moreover, the dynamic responses of different parts are apparently connected, so the coupling effect cannot be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

References

  1. 1.

    Wang SQ, Zhang JP, Malachowski J et al (2014) FEA analysis of subsea PLET installation and operation. In: 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering

  2. 2.

    Thorsen S (2012) Conceptual design and review of open PLET system (Master’s thesis). University of Stavanger, Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bai Y, Bai Q (2010) Subsea engineering handbook. Gulf Professional Pub, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Xiao DM, Wu ZX, Chu LP et al (2015) Design of embedded in-line installation plan and key fabrication technology of subsea manifold in PY35-1/35-2 gas fields. China Offshore Oil Gas 27(1):121–125

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jensen GA (2010) Offshore pipelaying dynamics (Doctoral thesis). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhou MJ, Wang CT, Gu YW et al (2016) Retrospect and prospect of technology on deepwater pipeline end termination. China Offshore Platf 31(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jia D, Agrawal M (2013) Coupled transient CFD and diffraction modeling for installation of subsea equipment/structures in splash zone. In: Proceedings of the ASME 32nd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering

  8. 8.

    Wang YY, Duan ML, Feng JK et al (2014) Modeling for the optimization of layout scenarios of cluster manifolds with pipeline end manifolds. Appl Ocean Res 46:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu T, Ruan WD, Bai Y et al (2015) Mathematical model of PLEM installation in deepwater. In: Proceedings of the ASME 34th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering

  10. 10.

    Wang YY, Tuo HH, Li LW et al (2018) Dynamic simulation of installation of the subsea cluster manifold by drilling pipe in deep water based on OrcaFlex. J Petrol Sci Eng 163:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Perez GV, Pistidda A, Smienk H (2014) Moonpool effect assessment during structure installation. In: 33rd International conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering

  12. 12.

    Ting KC, Chavan K, Balmford S et al (2017) The installation of flexible risers and flowlines systems with PLET on the subsea end. In: Proceedings of the ASME 36th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering

  13. 13.

    Zan YF, Yuan LH, Huang K et al (2018) Numerical simulations of dynamic pipeline-vessel response on a deepwater S-laying vessel. Processes 6(12):216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ai SM, Sun LP, Tao LB et al (2018) Modeling and simulation of deepwater pipeline S-lay with coupled dynamic positioning. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 140(5):051704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sun LP, Zhu JX, Liu SN (2014) Coupling time-domain analysis for dynamic positioning during S-lay installation. Int J Math Comput Phys Quantum Eng 8(6):890–897

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Malvern LE (1969) Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    SINTEF Ocean (2018) Riflex 4.14.0 theory manual, Norway

  18. 18.

    Lehn E, Øritsland O (1987) Hydrodynamic forces on subsea modules during lifting operations. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on practical design of ships and mobile units

  19. 19.

    Sarpkaya T, Isaacson M (1981) Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    SINTEF Ocean (2018) Simo 4.14.0 theory manual, Norway

  21. 21.

    Li G, Yin HJ, Jiang Y et al (2014) Installation method of subsea in-line manifold based on S-lay. Ship Ocean Eng 43(2):131–134

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gao S, Meng XW, Sun YY et al (2016) HYSY201 work capacity assessments on in-line manifold installation. Oil Field Equip 45(5):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Orcina (2016) OrcaFlex manual version 10.0e, Cumbria

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51809067), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3072019CFM0101, 3072019CF0102), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC0309400) and the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2016ZX05057020) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingfei Zan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, D., Huang, K., Zan, Y. et al. Coupling time-domain analysis for pipeline end termination installation based on pipelaying. J Mar Sci Technol 25, 808–827 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-019-00682-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pipeline end termination installation
  • Pipelaying
  • Numerical simulation
  • Coupling
  • Time domain