Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of CFD simulations of the flow around a full-scale rowing blade with realistic kinematics

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article deals with the validation of the modelling and numerical simulation of a rowing stroke, by means of CFD. Simplified but realistic strokes were performed in a towing tank with a rotating arm and a real flexible oar. Those laboratory conditions are better controlled than those of in situ trials. An FSI procedure is developed to take into account the oar bending, which is essential in the physics of this flow. The results show that this numerical framework is able to reproduce qualitatively the real flow including the breaking of the free surface around the blade and the transport of the air cavity behind it. The profiles of forces are well reproduced, with propulsive forces overestimated by 5–12% for their maxima. The study also focuses on the computation of the uncertainties. It is highlighted that, even for this well-controlled experimental equipment, the uncertainties on the quantities of interest are of about 11%. In other words, the experimental uncertainty covers the numerical errors. So, this numerical modelling is validated and can be used for design and optimisation of blades and oars, or to contribute to the better understanding of the boat–oar–rower system and its dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The towing tank has a length of 140 m today.

  2. The acronym METHRIC comes from the French for Modelling of High-Reynolds Incompressible Turbulent Flows and Couplings

  3. If the trial starts with an oar set to an angle \(\psi _{0}=0^{^{\circ }}\), it may generate large oscillations and disturb the flow. To avoid this behaviour, the oar is set to a slightly different angle, such that the lift force is null.

References

  1. Barré S, Kobus JM (2010) Comparison between common models of forces on oar blades and forces measured by towing tank tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 224(1):37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caplan N, Gardner TN (2007) Optimization of oar blade design for improved performance in rowing. J Sports Sci 25(13):1471–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coppel AL, Gardner TN, Caplan N, Hargreaves DM (2010) Simulating the fluid dynamic behaviour of oar blades in competition rowing. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 224:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanna RK (2012) CFD in sport—a retrospective; 1992–2012. Proc Eng 34:622–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henson VE, Meier Yang U (2002) BoomerAMG: a parallel algebraic multigrid solver and preconditioner. Appl Numerl Math 41:155–177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinoshita T, Miyashita M, Kobayashi H, Hino T (2008) Rowing velocity prediction program with estimating hydrodynamic load acting on an oar blade. In: Kato N, Kamimura S (eds) Bio-mechanisms of swimming and flying. Springer, Tokyo, pp 345–359

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Laschowski B, Hopkins CC, de Bruyn JR, Nolte V (2017) Modelling the deflection of rowing oar shafts. Sports Biomech 16(1):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leroyer A, Barré S, Kobus JM, Visonneau M (2008) Experimental and numerical investigations of the flow around an oar blade. J Mar Sci Technol 13(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leroyer A, Barré S, Kobus JM, Visonneau M (2010) Influence of free surface, unsteadiness and viscous effects on oar blade hydrodynamic loads. J Sports Sci 28(12):1287–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leroyer A, Barré S, Wackers J, Queutey P, Visonneau M, Kobus J.M (2012) Validation of CFD simulations for unsteady violent free surface flows : the case of the hydrodynamics around rowing blades. In: 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 26-31 August 2012

  11. Leroyer A, Visonneau M (2005) Numerical methods for RANSE simulations of a self-propelled fish-like body. J Fluids Struct 20(7):975–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Menter FR (1993) Zonal two-equation k-\(\omega\) turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, 1993. AIAA Pap 96–2906:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Queutey P, Visonneau M (2007) An interface capturing method for free-surface hydrodynamic flows. Comput Fluids 36(9):1481–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robert Y (2017) Numerical simulation and modelling of tridimensional free-surface flows. Application to the boat-oars-rower system. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale de Nantes

  15. Robert Y, Leroyer A, Barré S, Rongère F, Queutey P, Visonneau M (2014) Fluid mechanics in rowing: the case of the flow around the blades., pp 744–749

  16. Robert Y, Leroyer A, Wackers J, Visonneau M, Queutey P (2015) Time-splitting procedure for the resolution of the volume fraction for unsteady flows. In: Bertram V, Campana EF (eds), \(18^{th}\) Numerical towing tank symposium. Cortona, Italy

  17. Rongère F, Khalil W, Kobus J.M (2011) Dynamic modeling and simulation of rowing with a robotics formalism. In: 16th International conference on methods and models in automation and robotics (MMAR), 2011, pp 260–265

  18. Sliasas A, Tullis S (2009) The dynamic flow behaviour of an oar blade in motion using a hydrodynamics-based shell-velocity-coupled model of a rowing stroke. Proc Institut Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 224:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sliasas A, Tullis S (2009) Numerical modelling of rowing blade hydrodynamics. Sports Eng 12(1):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sliasas A, Tullis S (2010) A hydrodynamics-based model of a rowing stroke simulating effects of drag and lift on oar blade efficiency for various cant angles. Proc Eng 2(2):2857–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Söding H (2001) How to integrate free motions of solids in fluids. In: 4th Numerical towing tank symposium, Hamburg

  22. Videv TA, Doi Y (1993) Unsteady viscous flow simulation around the blade of rowing boat. J Soc Naval Arch Jpn 173:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wackers J, Deng G, Leroyer A, Queutey P, Visonneau M (2012) Adaptive grid refinement for hydrodynamic flows. Comput Fluids 55(55):85–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Yvin C, Leroyer A, Visonneau M (2013) Co-simulation in fluid–structure interaction with rigid bodies. In: Numerical towing tank symposium 2013 (NuTTS’13)

  25. Yvin C, Leroyer A, Visonneau M, Queutey P (2018) Added mass evaluation with a finite-volume solver for applications in fluidstructure interaction problems solved with co-simulation. J Fluids Struct 81:528–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was granted access to the HPC resources of GENCI (Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif) under the allocation A0022A00129 and was supported by a grant from the Région Pays de la Loire through the project ANOPACy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alban Leroyer.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robert, Y., Leroyer, A., Barré, S. et al. Validation of CFD simulations of the flow around a full-scale rowing blade with realistic kinematics. J Mar Sci Technol 24, 1105–1118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0610-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0610-y

Keywords

Navigation