Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty optimization design of an axially symmetric body using speed perturbation

  • Review article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a new design method for uncertainty shape optimization of an axially symmetric body influenced by speed perturbations. Four types of perturbation parameters (constant, interval, probability and interval probability) are addressed, and applicable methods for each type are investigated. First, two uncertainty optimization methods are introduced: interval optimization and distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty. Shape formulae of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) with a revised method for calculating resistance are then described. Finally, a model for AUV hull form optimization is provided, and several case studies that use different uncertainty optimization methods and parameters are presented. The case studies verify the feasibility and superiority of the novel approach. The results show that the new uncertainty optimization design method is very adaptable and useful in the design of an axially symmetric body, such as an AUV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pang Y, Wang Y, Yang Z, Gao T (2014) Direct route drag calculation and shape optimization of Myring shape axisymmetric revolution body. J Harbin Eng Univ 35(9):1093–1098

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Pang YJ (2015) Study on AUV hydrodynamic optimization and motion performance near free surface. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joung TH, Sammut K, He F, Lee SK (2012) Shape optimization of an autonomous underwater vehicle with a ducted propeller using computational fluid dynamics analysis. Int J Naval Architecture Ocean Eng 4(1):44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alkan B, Isman MK(2013) Hydrodynamic design optimization of an autonomous underwater vehicle based on response surface methodology. International Advanced Technologies Symposium

  5. Salleh ZB, Ghani M, Ramli M (2012) Preliminary design of AUV(autonomous underwater vehicle) with higher resolution underwater camera for marine exploration. Asia-Pacific Workshop on Marine Hydrodynamics

  6. Gong GW, Sun J (2013) Theory and application of interval multi-objective evolutionary optimization. Sci Press 1–22

  7. Li W, Tian XL (2008) Numerical solution method for general interval quadratic programming. Appl Math Comput 202(2):589–595

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shari H, Nickolas V (2010) Introducing uncertainty in multidiscipline ship design. Naval Eng J 122(2):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diez M, Peri D, Fasano G, Campana EF (2010) Multidisciplinary robust optimization for ship design. 28th ONR Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena (USA)

  10. He W, Diez M, Zou ZJ, Campana EF, Stern F (2013) URANS study of Delft catamaran total/added resistance, motions and slamming loads in head sea including irregular wave and uncertainty quantification for variable regular wave and geometry. Ocean Eng 74:189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diez M, He W, Campana EF, Stern F (2014) Uncertainty quantification of Delft catamaran resistance, sinkage and trim for variable Froude number and geometry using metamodels, quadrature and Karhunen–Loève expansion. J Mar Sci Technol 19(2):143–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper Res 58(3):595–612

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng JQ, Abdel L, Marc L (2013) Distributional robust stochastic shortest path problem. Electron Notes Discrete Math 41:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang HP, Han DF, Guo CY (2012) Modeling of the principal dimensions of large vessels based on a BPNN trained by an improved PSO. J Harbin Eng Univ 33(7):806–810

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen HG, Li LH, Xu HP (2006) Modified very fast simulated annealing algorithm. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci) 34(8):1121–1125

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimitris B, Dessislava P, Melvyn S, Robust linear optimization under general norms. Oper Res Lett 32(6):510–516, (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou RJ, Min XB, Tong XJ, Chen R, Li X, Liu Z (2015) Distributional robust optimization under moment uncertainty of environmental and economic dispatch for power system. Proc CSEE 35(13):3248–3256

    Google Scholar 

  18. De B, Pascoal A, De S (2008) Investigation of a method for predicting AUV derivatives. Ocean Eng 35:1627–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51609030) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. 3132018205, 3132016339).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Hang Hou.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, Y.H., Liang, X. Uncertainty optimization design of an axially symmetric body using speed perturbation. J Mar Sci Technol 24, 612–619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0560-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0560-4

Keywords

Navigation