A hydrodynamic model of bridle towed system

Original article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

To determine the parameters of bridle towed systems in preliminary design and describe the configuration and dynamic behavior of bridle cables during tow-ship changes its speed and course, a tug–cable–barge coupling motion model for bridle towed system is proposed. The governing equation of towing bridle was established based on finite difference method and the six-degrees-of-freedom equations of motion for tug and barge were adopted according to the MMG modeling theory. The dynamic coupling boundary conditions for bridle towed system are derived. The steady- state motion parameters of towing bridle were confirmed by double bisection method. The equations of towing bridle are solved by Newton iteration method. Tug and barge motion equations are solved by Runge–Kutta method. The computing results indicate that the model and algorithm in this paper can be used to predict the configuration and dynamic behavior, and determine the parameters in preliminary design of bridle towed systems.

Keywords

Bridle towed system Towing bridle Steady-state motion Double bisection method 

References

  1. 1.
    Walton TS, Polachech H (1960) Calculation of transient motion of submerged cables. Math Comput 14:27–46MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakajima Toshio, Motora Seizo, Fujino Masataka (1983) A three-dimensional lumped mass method for the dynamic analysis of mooring lines. J Soc Nav Arch Jpn 154:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fitriadhy A, Yasukawa H, Koh KK (2013) Course stability of a ship towing system in wind. Ocean Eng 64:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitriadhy A, Yasukawa H, Maimun A (2015) Theoretical and experimental analysis of a slack towline motion on tug-towed ship during turning. Ocean Eng 99:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burgess, J. J., Modeling of undersea cable installation with a finite difference method. In: Proceedings of the first international offshore and polar engineering conference, Edinburgh, UK, vol 2, pp 222-227 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aamo OM, Fossen TI (2000) Finite element modelling of mooring lines. Math Comput Simul 53:415–422MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delmer TN, Stephens TC, Coe JM (1983) Numerical simulation of towed cables. Ocean Eng 10:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ablow CM, Schechter S (1983) Numerical simulation of undersea cable dynamics. Ocean Eng 10:443–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu J, Chwang AT (1998) A hydrodynamic model of a two-part underwater towed system. Ocean Eng 27:455–472Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srivastava VK, Sanyasiraju Y (2013) Dynamic behavior of underwater towed cable in linear profile. Int J Sci Eng Res 2:1–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuan ZJ, Jin LA, Tian HD et al (2013) Numerical simulation of underwater towed system using finite difference method with variational step. Command Control Simul 35:95–101Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamamoto M, Akiyoshi T (1988) Study on ship motions and capsizing in following seas: 1st report: equations of motion for numerical simulation. J Soc Nav Arch Jpn 163:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun HB, Shi CJ, Weng YZ (2014) Steady state solution of towed surface system with bridle. Navig China 37:59–63Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin WJ, Cai T, Shao ZP (2011) HAIYANG SHIYOU ZHICHICHUAN TUOHANG ZUOYE JISHU JI YINGYONG ZHIDAOSHU. China Communications Press, Beijing, pp 89–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Navigation CollegeJimei UniversityXiamenChina
  2. 2.China Oilfield Services LimitedTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations