Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-coupling effect and motion control of an autonomous underwater vehicle with internal actuators

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) use internal actuators, e.g., tunnel thruster, moving mass, and ballast chamber, for yaw and pitch steering. Unlike control surfaces, internal actuators perform independently of relative flows around AUVs, thus suitable for missions which require excellent low-speed maneuverability. This research focuses on an investigation into the control design of an REMUS AUV using internal actuators to steer its heading direction. It has been shown that an internal moving mass together with a tunnel thruster is capable of providing actuations to serve the purpose. However, our analysis indicates that a coupling between roll and pitch motion causes the internal actuators to oscillate if depth-plane motion is neglected when deriving control laws for the internal actuators. We present a novel control strategy by taking advantage of the cross-coupling effect when designing the heading autopilot system with internal actuators. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed design are validated by simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dunbabin M, Roberts J, Usher K, Winstanley G, Corke P (2005) A hybrid AUV design for shallow water reef navigation. In: Robotics and automation, 2005. ICRA 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on, IEEE, pp 2105–2110

  2. Saunders A, Nahon M (2002) The effect of forward vehicle velocity on through-body auv tunnel thruster performance. In: OCEANS’02 MTS/IEEE, IEEE, vol 1, pp 250–259

  3. Palmer A, Hearn GE, Stevenson P (2008) Modelling tunnel thrusters for autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings of the second IFAC workshop on navigation, guidance and control of underwater vehicles, international federation of automatic control (IFAC), vol 31, pp 91–96

  4. Steenson LV, Phillips AB, Rogers E, Furlong ME, Turnock SR (2012) Experimental verification of a depth controller using model predictive control with constraints onboard a thruster actuated auv. IFAC Proc 45(5):275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida H, Hyakudome T, Ishibashi S, Ochi H, Watanabe Y, Sawa T, Nakano Y, Ohmika S, Sugesawa M, Nakatani T (2012) Development of the cruising-auv jinbei. In: OCEANS, 2012-Yeosu, IEEE, pp 1–4

  6. Santhakumar M, Asokan T (2013) Power efficient dynamic station keeping control of a flat-fish type autonomous underwater vehicle through design modifications of thruster configuration. Ocean Eng 58:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allotta B, Caiti A, Costanzi R, Fanelli F, Fenucci D, Meli E, Ridolfi A (2016) A new auv navigation system exploiting unscented kalman filter. Ocean Eng 113:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Townsend NC, Shenoi RA (2011) Gyrostabilizer vehicular technology. Appl Mech Rev 64(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Woolsey CA, Leonard NE (2002) Stabilizing underwater vehicle motion using internal rotors. Automatica 38(12):2053–2062

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sidi MJ (1997) Spacecraft dynamics and control: a practical engineering approach, vol 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Perez T, Blanke M (2010) Ship roll motion control. In: IFAC conference on control applications in marine systems

  12. Townsend NC, Shenoi RA (2014) Control strategies for marine gyrostabilizers. Oceanic Eng IEEE J 39(2):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thornton B, Ura T, Nose Y, Turnock S (2005) Internal actuation of underwater robots using control moment gyros. In: Oceans 2005-Europe, IEEE, vol 1, pp 591–598

  14. Thornton B, Ura T, Nose Y, Turnock S (2007) Zero-g class underwater robots: unrestricted attitude control using control moment gyros. Oceanic Eng IEEE J 32(3):565–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thornton B, Ura T, Nose Y (2008) Combined energy storage and three-axis attitude control of a gyroscopically actuated auv. In: OCEANS 2008, IEEE, pp 1–9

  16. Townsend N, Shenoi R (2016) Feasibility study of a new energy scavenging system for an autonomous underwater vehicle. Auton Robots 40(6):973–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tangirala S, Dzielski J (2007) A variable buoyancy control system for a large auv. Ocean Eng IEEE J 32(4):762–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Woods SA, Bauer RJ, Seto ML (2012) Automated ballast tank control system for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE J Ocean Eng 37(4):727–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard NE, Graver JG (2001) Model-based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders. Ocean Eng IEEE J 26(4):633–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksen CC, Osse TJ, Light RD, Wen T, Lehman TW, Sabin PL, Ballard JW, Chiodi AM (2001) Seaglider: a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research. Ocean Eng IEEE J 26(4):424–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherman J, Davis R, Owens W, Valdes J (2001) The autonomous underwater glider spray. Ocean Eng IEEE J 26(4):437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Webb DC, Simonetti PJ, Jones CP (2001) SLOCUM: an underwater glider propelled by environmental energy. Ocean Eng IEEE J 26(4):447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li JW, Song BW, Shao C (2008) Tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicles with internal moving mass. Acta Autom Sin 34(10):1319–1323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao E, Song BW (2012) Modeling and variable structure control of autonomous underwater vehicles with moving mass. Mechanical and electronics engineering III, trans tech publ, applied mechanics and materials 130:1963–1967

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alvarez A, Caffaz A, Caiti A, Casalino G, Gualdesi L, Turetta A, Viviani R (2009) Folaga: a low-cost autonomous underwater vehicle combining glider and AUV capabilities. Ocean Eng 36(1):24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Caffaz A, Caiti A, Calabrò V, Casalino G, Guerrini P, Maguer A, Munafò A, Potter J, Tay H, Turetta A (2012) The enhanced Folaga: a hybrid AUV with modular payloads. In: Further Advances in Unmanned Marine Vehicles. The Institution of Engineering and Technology. pp. 309–330

  27. Wang Sx, Sun Xj, Wang Yh, Jg Wu, Wang Xm (2011) Dynamic modeling and motion simulation for a winged hybrid-driven underwater glider. China Ocean Eng 25:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Claus B, Bachmayer R (2012) Hybrid glider: motivation, design and evaluation. Inst Eng Technol 13:283–307

    Google Scholar 

  29. Isa K, Arshad M, Ishak S (2014) A hybrid-driven underwater glider model, hydrodynamics estimation, and an analysis of the motion control. Ocean Eng 81:111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Claus B, Bachmayer R, Cooney L (2012) Analysis and development of a buoyancy-pitch based depth control algorithm for a hybrid underwater glider. In: Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), 2012 IEEE/OES, IEEE, pp 1–6

  31. Jones C, Allsup B, DeCollibus C (2014) Slocum glider: Expanding our understanding of the oceans. In: Oceans-St. John’s, 2014, IEEE, pp 1–10

  32. Petrich J, Stilwell DJ (2011) Robust control for an autonomous underwater vehicle that suppresses pitch and yaw coupling. Ocean Eng 38:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li B, Su TC (2017) Heading autopilot of autonomous underwater vehicles with internal moving mass. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 12(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li B, Su TC (2016) Nonlinear heading control of an autonomous underwater vehicle with internal actuators. Ocean Eng 125:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. von Alt C, Allen B, Austin T, Forrester N, Goldsborough R, Purcell M, Stokey R (2001) Hunting for mines with remus: a high performance, affordable, free swimming underwater robot. In: OCEANS, 2001. MTS/IEEE conference and exhibition, IEEE, vol 1, pp 117–122

  36. Prestero TJ (2001) Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the remus autonomous underwater vehicle. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  37. Li B, Su TC (2015) Dynamics of remus AUV in ocean current. In: The twenty-fifth international ocean and polar engineering conference, international society of offshore and polar engineers

  38. Khalil H (2002) Nonlinear systems, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Steenson LV, Phillips AB, Furlong ME, Rogers E, Turnock SR (2011) The performance of vertical tunnel thrusters on an autonomous underwater vehicle operating near the free surface in waves. In: Second international symposium on marine propulsors smp 11, Hamburg, Germany, June 2011

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Grant No. 2017M621479.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Wang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Wang, L., Wang, X. et al. Cross-coupling effect and motion control of an autonomous underwater vehicle with internal actuators. J Mar Sci Technol 24, 98–110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0534-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0534-6

Keywords

Navigation