Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical study of free surface flow in a 3-dimensional FLNG tank under coupled rotational–heave excitations

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, free surface flow in a full-sized 3D FLNG tank is numerically studied under coupled rotational–heave excitations. The numerical model uses the standard kε turbulence model and the volume of fluid method to describe fluid flow and track free surface. The emphasis of this study is making use of a full-sized tank with coupled excitations. A mesh independence study and comparison with other experiment and numerical simulation are implemented to verify the computational model. By parametrically investigating the influence of the initial phase difference, heave frequency and filling ratio, it is found that an initial phase difference of 0.5π and 1π can result in a higher local pressure near the tank corner and 0.5π will lead to a bigger amplitude of surface sloshing. A heave frequency of 2 times the natural frequency makes the surface sloshing flow most violent, but a heave frequency larger than that will turn the sloshing pattern into an up-and-down oscillation. A low filling ratio is more sensitive to both single rotational excitation and coupled excitations. However, a high filling ratio is relatively stable under rotation alone, but becomes much more violent from an induced heave excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Union IG (2015) World LNG Report—2015 edition

  2. Colella P, Graves DT, Modiano D, Puckett EG, Sussman M (1999) An embedded boundary/volume of fluid method for free surface flows in irregular geometries. 3rd ASME/JSME joint fluids engineering conference ASME Paper FEDSM99-7108, pp 9–14

  3. Du J, Fix B, Glimm J, Jia X, Li X, Li Y, Wu L (2006) A simple package for front tracking. J Comput Phys 213:613–628

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakayama T, Mori M (1996) An Eulerian finite element method for time-dependent free surface problems in hydrodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 22(175–171):194

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Peskin CS (2003) The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer 11:479–517

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamn-Ching Chen KY (2009) CFD simulations of wave–current-body interactions including greenwater and wet deck slamming. Comput Fluids 38:970–980

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39:201–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee BH, Park JC, Kim MH, Jung SJ, Ryu MC, Kim YS (2010) Numerical simulation of impact loads using a particle method. Ocean Eng 37:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zalar M, Malenica S, Mravak Z, Moirod N (2007) Some aspects of direct calculation methods for the assessment of LNG tank structure under sloshing impact. In: Proceedings of the international conference on liquefied natural gas, Barcelona, Spain, PO-39.1

  10. Zhao WH, Yang JM, Hu ZQ, Xiao LF, Peng T (2013) Experimental and numerical investigation of the roll motion behavior of a floating liquefied natural gas system. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 56:629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman JN (2005) Wave effects on vessels with internal tanks. 20th Workshop on water waves and floating bodies, Spitsbergen

  12. Kim Y (2002) A numerical study on sloshing flows coupled with ship motion—the anti-rolling tank problem. J Ship Res 46:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim Y, Nam BW, Kim DW, Kim YS (2007) Study on coupling effects of ship motion and sloshing. Ocean Eng 34:2176–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Bang-Fuh NR (2005) Time-independent finite difference analysis of fully non-linear and viscous fluid sloshing in a rectangular tank. J Comput Phys 209:47–81

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Graczyk M, Berget K, Allers J (2012) Experimental investigation of invar edge effect in membrane LNG tanks. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 134:031801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Z, Zong Z, Li HT, Li J (2013) An investigation into the pressure on solid walls in 2D sloshing using SPH method. Ocean Eng 59:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kishev ZR, Hu C, Kashiwagi M (2006) Numerical simulation of violent sloshing by a CIP-based method. J Mar Sci Technol 11:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee DH, Kim MH, Kwon SH, Kim JW, Lee YB (2007) A parametric sensitivity study on LNG tank sloshing loads by numerical simulations. Ocean Eng 34:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu D, Lin P (2008) A numerical study of three-dimensional liquid sloshing in tanks. J Comput Phys 227:3921–3939

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Brambilla P, Guardone A (2015) Assessment of dynamic adaptive grids in volume-of-fluid simulations of oblique drop impacts onto liquid films. J Comput Appl Math 281:277–283

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Chien K-Y (1982) Predictions of channel and boundary-layer flows with a low-Reynolds-number turbulence model. AIAA J 20:33–338

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Fu J, Tang Y, Li J, Ma Y, Chen W, Li H (2016) Four kinds of the two-equation turbulence model’s research on flow field simulation performance of DPF’s porous media and swirl-type regeneration burner. Appl Therm Eng 93:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khaldi N, Marzouk S, Mhiri H, Bournot P (2015) Distribution characteristics of pollutant transport in a turbulent two-phase flow. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:6349–6358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. By Bruce M, Savage MCJ, Members ASCE (2001) Flow over ogee spillway: physical and numerical model case study. J Hydraul Eng 127:640–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bai W, Liu X, Koh CG (2015) Numerical study of violent LNG sloshing induced by realistic ship motions using level set method. Ocean Eng 97:100–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu D, Tang W, Wang J, Xue H, Wang K (2017) Modelling of liquid sloshing using CLSVOF method and very large eddy simulation. Ocean Eng 129:160–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is sponsored by prospective Project (BY2014127-06) and cooperation with Furui SE Co., Ltd (BK2013092); both are supported by Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province, China and also by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Scientific Research Innovation Project for Graduate Students in Jiangsu Province (KYLX15_0060).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhonghua Ni.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Y., Pfotenhauer, J.M., Miller, F. et al. Numerical study of free surface flow in a 3-dimensional FLNG tank under coupled rotational–heave excitations. J Mar Sci Technol 23, 333–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0467-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0467-5

Keywords

Navigation