Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective optimum design of a buoy for the resonant-type wave energy converter

  • Review article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the resonant type of wave energy converter (WEC) and the determination method of its geometric parameters, which were obtained to construct a robust and optimal structure. The optimization problem is formulated with the objectives of simultaneously maximizing the absorbed power output, which is mainly related to optimal power take-off damping, and minimizing the production cost by the volume of the required sheet plate using a weighting method. The constraints are composed of the response surfaces that indicate the resonance period (heave, pitch) and the meta-center height of the buoy. The signal-to-noise ratio calculated from the normalized multi-objective results with the weight factor can be used to help select the robust design level. In order to obtain a sample data set, the motion responses of the power buoy were analyzed using a commercial code based on the boundary element method. We present the Pareto-optimal set to reveal the relationship between the power and the volume of a sheet plate. Lastly, the power efficiency of the WEC with the optimum design variables is estimated as the captured wave ratio resulting from the absorbed power. The result of the WEC design is economically optimal and satisfies given constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thorpe TW (2010) Survey of energy resources. World Energy Council, pp 570–595

  2. Falcao AF de O (2010) Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:899–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babarit A, Hals J, Muliawan MJ, Kurniawan A, Moan T, Krokstad J (2012) Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renew Energy 41:44–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornett AM (2008) A global wave energy resource assessment. International offshore and polar engineering conference, Vancouver, pp 318–326

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clement A, McCullen P, Falcao A, Fiorentino A, Gardner F, Hammarlund K, Lemonis G, Lewis T, Nielsen K, Petroncini S, Pontes MT, Schild P, Sjostrom BO, Sorensen HC, Thorpe T (2002) Wave energy in Europe: current status and perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 6:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang D, Li W, Lin Y (2009) Wave energy in China: current status and perspectives. Renew Energy 34:2089–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tzang SY, Wang CC, Chen DW, Yang JZ, Hsieh CM, Chen JH (2012). Wave energy resources on coastal waters of Northeast Taiwan. In: 4th International conference on ocean energy, Dublin

  8. Kim G, Jeong WM, Lee KS, Jun K, Lee ME (2011) Offshore and nearshore wave energy assessment around the Korea Peninsula. Energy 36:1460–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Song M, Kim D, Kim M, Hong K, Jun K (2004) Analysis of wave energy density for Korean coastal sea area based on long-term simulated wave data. J Korean Soc Mar Environ Eng 7(3):152–157

    Google Scholar 

  10. Falnes J (2002) Ocean waves and oscillating systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Renzi E, Dias F (2012) Resonant behaviour of an oscillating wave energy converter in a channel. J Fluid Mech 701:482–510

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Engstrom J, Kurupath V, Isberg J, Leijon M (2011) A resonant two body system for a point for a point absorbing wave energy converter with direct-driven linear generator. J Appl Phys 110:124904-1–124904-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leijon M, Bernhoff H, Agren O, Isberg J, Sundberg J, Berg M, Karlsson KE, Wolfbrandt A (2005) Multiphysics simulation of wave energy to electric energy conversion by permanent magnet linear generator. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 20(1):210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kweon H, Koh H, Kim J, Choi Y (2013) Experimental study for the resonance effect of the power buoy amplitude. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 33(2):220–235

    Google Scholar 

  15. Colby M, Nasroullahi E, Tumer K (2011) Optimizing ballast design of wave energy converters using evolutionary algorithms. In: 13th annual genetic and evolutionary computation conference, Dublin, pp 1739–1746

  16. McCabe AP, Aggidis GA, Widden MB (2010) Optimizing the shape of a surge-and-pitch wave energy collector using a genetic algorithm. Renew Energy 35:2767–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes RPF, Henriques JCC, Gato LMC, Falcao AFO (2012) Hydrodynamic optimization of an axisymmetric floating oscillating water column for wave energy conversion. Renew Energy 44:328–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roux WJ, Stander N, Hatfka RT (1998) Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42:517–534

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hess JL, Smith AMO (1964) Calculation of non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three dimensional bodies. J Ship Res 8(2):22–44

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borgarino B, Babarit A, Ferrant P (2012) Impact of wave interactions effects on energy absorption in large arrays of wave energy converters. Ocean Eng 41:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oskamp JA, Özkan-Haller HT (2012) Power calculations for a passively tuned point absorber wave energy converter on the Oregon coast. Renew Energy 45:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beatty SJ, Wild P, Buckham BJ (2010) Integration of a wave energy converter into the electricity supply of a remote Alaskan island. Renew Energy 35(6):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Journée JMJ, Massie WW (2001) Offshore hydromechanics. Delft University of Technology, Delft

  24. Price AAE, Dent CJ, Wallace AR (2009) On the capture width of wave energy converters. Appl Ocean Res 31:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruy WS, Yang YS, Kim GH, Yeun YS (2001) Topology design of truss structures in a multicriteria environment. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 16:246–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim GH (1994). Multicriteria structural optimization by genetic algorithm. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul

  27. Ruy WS, Yang YS (2001) Selection strategies in a structural design support system. Struct Mulidiscipl Optim 21:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Human Resources Development program (No. 20094020200020) of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. Also, this research was supported by the New and Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2010302007 0080).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Won-Sun Ruy.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, HJ., Ruy, WS., Cho, IH. et al. Multi-objective optimum design of a buoy for the resonant-type wave energy converter. J Mar Sci Technol 20, 53–63 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0268-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0268-z

Keywords

Navigation