Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 404–417 | Cite as

Optimization of shipyard space allocation and scheduling using a heuristic algorithm

  • J.-D. CapraceEmail author
  • C. Petcu
  • M. G. Velarde
  • P. Rigo
Original article

Abstract

In this article we describe the development of a tool that allows planners to efficiently and effectively plan space within valuable areas of a shipyard. Traditionally, space is considered as resource; however, it is difficult to accurately account for and plan its consumption with the currently available planning software’s. The spatial scheduling tool described in this article can be used by planners to manually or automatically reserve space within the shipyard for construction of large blocks over the entire erection period of the ship. The software is coupled with a heuristic optimization solver inspired by an algorithm used for "3D bin-packing problems." The result is the ability to efficiently generate and compare multiple space allocation alternatives in a reduced time with the ultimate goal of maintaining the critical ship erection schedule. A better solution than manual or semi-automatic allocation of blocks can be obtained through the optimization module.

Keywords

Space allocation Optimization Decision making Scheduling Planning Shipbuilding 3D bin-packing 

References

  1. 1.
    Hugues O (1994) Applied computer aided design. Technical report, International Ship and Offshore Structure Congress—ISSC, inst. marine dynamics, NewfoundlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    List of the world’s largest cruise ships. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
  3. 3.
    Kim Y, Lee D (2007) A study on the construction of detail integrated scheduling system of shipbuilding process. J Soc Naval Archit Korea 44:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bair F, Langer Y, Caprace J, Rigo P (2005) Modelling, simulation and optimization of a shipbuilding workshop. COMPIT’05—the 4th international conference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries, May, vol 1, Hamburg, pp 283–293Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nedeb C, Friedewald A, Wagner L, Hubler M (2006) Simulation of material flow processes in the planning of production spaces in shipbuilding. COMPIT’06—the 5th international conference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries, May, vol 1, Leiden, pp 186–198Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park K, Lee K, Park S, Kim S (1996) Modeling and solving the spatial block scheduling problem in a shipbuilding company. Comput Ind Eng 30:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Okumoto Y, Iseki R (2005) Optimization of block allocation in assembly area using simulated annealing method. J Jpn Soc Naval Archit Ocean Eng 1:71–76 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee K, Lee J, Choi S (1996) A spatial scheduling system and its application to shipbuilding: DAS-CURVE. Exp Syst Appl 10:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee D, Kang Y, Kim H (2005) Block assignment planning for shipbuilding considering preference shop and load balancing. Proc 12th ICCAS 2005 1:55–68Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wibisono M, Hamada K, Kitamura M, Kesavadey V (2007) Optimization system of block division using genetic algorithm and product model. J Jpn Soc Naval Archit Ocean Eng 6:109–118Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finke DA, Ligetti CB, Traband MT, Roy A (2007) Shipyard space allocation and scheduling. J Ship Prod 23:197–201Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finke DA, Ligetti CB, Traband MT, Roy A (2008) Activity-based spatial scheduling. J Ship Prod 24:12–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho K, Chung K, Park C, Park J, Kim H (2001) A spatial scheduling system for block painting process in shipbuilding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50:339–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shin JG, Kwon OH, Ryu C (2008) Heuristic and metaheuristic spatial planning of assembly blocks with process schedules in an assembly shop using differential evolution. Prod Plan Control 19:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martello S, Pisinger D, Vigo D (2000) The three dimensional bin packing problem. Oper Res 48:256–267MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu Y, Li W, Goh M, de Souza R (2010) Three-dimensional bin packing problem with variable bin height. Eur J Oper Res 202:347–355CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee JK, Lee KJ, Park HK, Hong JS, Lee JS (1997) Developing scheduling systems for Daewoo Shipbuilding: DAS project. Eur J Oper Res 97(2):380–395Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim A, Rodrigues B, Yang Y (2005) 3-D container packing heuristics. Appl Intell 22:125–134CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lodi A, Martello S, Vigo D (2002) Heuristic algorithms for the three-dimensional bin packing problem. Eur J Oper Res 141:410–420MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garey MR, Johnson DS (1990) Computers and intractability; a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co, LinkedInGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brunetta L, Gregoire P (2005) A general purpose algorithm for three-dimensional packing. INFORMS J Comput 17:328–338MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Faroe O, Pisinger D, Zachariasen M (2003) Guided local search for the three-dimensional bin-packing problem. INFORMS J Comput 15:267–283MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martello S, Pisinger D, Vigo D, Boef ED, Korst J (2007) Algorithm 864: general and robot package variants of the three-dimensional bin packing problem. ACM Trans Math Softw 33:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langer Y, Bay M, Crama Y, Bair F, Caprace J, Rigo P (2005) Optimization of surface utilization using heuristic approaches. COMPIT’05—the 4th international conference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries, May, vol 1, hamburg, pp 419–425.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bay M, Crama Y, Langer Y, Rigo P (2010) Space and time allocation in a shipyard assembly hall. Ann Oper Res 179:57–76MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-D. Caprace
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • C. Petcu
    • 1
  • M. G. Velarde
    • 2
  • P. Rigo
    • 1
  1. 1.ANAST-University of LiègeLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.FIMCBOR-Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL)GuayaquilEcuador

Personalised recommendations