Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical analysis of ducted propeller performance under open water test condition

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the open water performance of the Ka-series propellers at various pitch and expanded area ratios in combination with the 19A duct by employing the panel method panMARE and the RANSE code ANSYS-CFX. An efficient method, Caly, is developed in order to generate the 3D-geometry and the surface numerical grid of the ducted propellers. Caly can be coupled with ANSYS-TurboGrid to automatically produce 3D-grids for the RANSE solver. The numerical results are compared with published experimental data and the flow details are concluded and compared. The influences that the grid resolution, the panel arrangements of duct and blade, and the flow in gap between inside wall of the duct and blade tip on the numerical results are studied. Grids verification, turbulence model dependency analysis and Reynolds number scantling are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

Propeller diameter

\( J \) :

Advance coefficient \( J = \frac{V}{nD} \)

\( F \) :

Thrust force of blade

\( F_{\text{tn}} \) :

Thrust force of duct

\( n \) :

Rotation speed

\( C_{\text{TP}} \) :

Thrust coefficient \( C_{\text{TP}} = \frac{F}{{1/2}\rho V^{2} \pi R^{2} } \)

\( K_{\text{tt}} \) :

Total thrust coefficient \( K_{\text{tt}} = \frac{{F + F_{\text{tn}} }}{{\rho n^{2} D^{4} }} \)

\( K_{\text{tn}} \) :

Duct thrust coefficient \( K_{\text{tn}} = \frac{{F_{\text{tn}} }}{{\rho n^{2} D^{4} }} \)

\( K_{\text{tb}} \) :

Blade thrust coefficient \( K_{\text{tb}} = \frac{F}{{\rho n^{2} D^{4} }} \)

\( K_{\text{q}} \) :

Torque coefficient \( K_{\text{q}} = \frac{\text{Torque}}{{\rho n^{2} D^{5} }} \)

\( \eta_{0} \) :

Total efficiency \( \eta_{0} = \frac{J}{2\pi }\frac{{K_{\text{tt}} }}{{K_{\text{q}} }} \)

\( \eta_{{ 0 {\text{b}}}} \) :

Blade efficiency \( \eta_{{ 0 {\text{b}}}} = \frac{J}{2\pi }\frac{{K_{\text{tb}} }}{{K_{\text{q}} }} \)

V :

Homogeneous inflow velocity

\( p \) :

Local pressure

\( \rho \) :

Mass density

References

  1. Kerwin JE, Kinnas SA, Lee JT, Shih W-Z (1987) A surface panel method for the hydrodynamic analysis of ducted propellers. Trans SNAME 95:93–122

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes MJ (1993) Analysis of multi-component ducted propellers in unsteady flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Ocean Engineering, MIT

  3. Baltazar J, Falcão de Campos, Bosschers J (2011) Open-water thrust and torque predictions of a ducted propeller system with a panel method. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, pp 132–141

  4. Gu H, Kinnas SA (2003) Modeling of contra-rotating and ducted propellers via coupling of a vortex-lattice with a finite volume method. In: Proceedings of Propeller/Shafting 2003 Symposium, SNAME, Virginia Beach, USA

  5. Moon IS, Kim KS, Lee C S (2002) Blade tip gap flow model for performance analysis of waterjet propulsors. In: Proceedings of International Association for Boundary Element Methods. University of Texas, Austin

  6. Abdel-Maksoud M, Steden M, Hundemer J (2010) Design of a multi-component propulsor. In: Proceedings of 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena

  7. Abdel-Maksoud M, Heinke H-J (1999) Investigation of viscous flow around modern propulsion systems. In: Proceedings of CFD’99. Ulsteinvik, Norway

  8. Abdel-Maksoud M, Heinke H-J (2002) Scale effects on ducted propellers. In: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 744–759

  9. Haimov H, Bobo MJ, Vicario J, Corral J del (2010) Ducted propellers. A solution for better propulsion of ships calculations and practice. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on fishing vessel energy efficiency E-fishing, Vigo, Spain

  10. Kuiper G (1992) The Wageningen propeller series. MARIN Publication 92-001,Netherland

  11. panMARE (2011) Institute of fluid dynamics and ship theory, Hamburg University of Technology, http://www.panmare.de

  12. Abdel-Maksoud M, Heinke H-J (2003) Scale effects on ducted propeller. 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka

  13. Hoekstra M (2006) A RANS-based analysis tool for ducted propeller systems in open water condition. Int Shipbuild Prog 53:205–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for their financial support of the first author’s research fellowship at the Institute of Fluid Dynamics and Ship Theory, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany. The authors also thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (No:51009090) for the financial support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Yu.

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, L., Greve, M., Druckenbrod, M. et al. Numerical analysis of ducted propeller performance under open water test condition. J Mar Sci Technol 18, 381–394 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0215-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0215-4

Keywords

Navigation