Skip to main content
Log in

Model and full scale CFD analysis of propeller boss cap fins (PBCF)

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses of propeller boss cap fins (PBCF) were carried out for two different propellers at model and full scale Reynolds numbers with two different inflow conditions. Computations corresponding to the reverse propeller open test (POT) experiment were confirmed to be in a good agreement with the measurement. The results of computations at different conditions have shown that increased Reynolds number and presence of hull wake both positively influence the effects of PBCF. Due to the combined effect of the Reynolds number and the wake, the gain in the propeller efficiency at the full scale condition was found to be significantly larger than that at the model test condition. The detailed investigation of the results suggested that the fin drag becomes smaller and the reduction of the boss drag becomes larger at the full scale condition. However, the predicted gain is still smaller than the values reported in the sea trial and logbook analysis. The remaining gap may be attributed to the difference in the estimated and actual wake distribution or to other factors such as interactions with hull and rudder, surface roughness, unsteadiness and hub vortex cavitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( D \) :

Propeller diameter

\( J \) :

Advance coefficient

\( n \) :

Rotation speed

\( K_{\text{T}} \) :

Thrust coefficient \( K_{\text{T}} = \frac{\text{Thrust}}{{\rho n^{2} D^{4} }} \)

\( K_{\text{Q}} \) :

Torque coefficient \( K_{\text{Q}} = \frac{\text{Torque}}{{\rho n^{2} D^{5} }} \)

\( R_{nD} \) :

Propeller Reynolds number \( R_{nD} = \frac{{nD^{2} }}{\nu } \)

\( C_{pn} \) :

Pressure coefficient \( C_{pn} = \frac{\text{Pressure}}{{\rho n^{2} D^{2} }} \)

\( \eta \) :

Propeller efficiency \( \eta = \frac{{J \cdot K_{\text{T}} }}{{2\pi K_{\text{Q}} }} \)

\( V_{0} \) :

Velocity of the uniform flow

\( \rho \) :

Density

\( \nu \) :

Kinematic viscosity

References

  1. Ouchi K, Ogura M, Kono Y, Orito H, Shiotsu T, Tamashima M, Koizuka H (1988) A research and development of PBCF (propeller boss cap fins)—improvement of flow from propeller boss. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 163:66–78 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ouchi K, Tamashima M, Kawasaki T, Koizuka H (1989) A research and development of propeller boss cap fins (PBCF): 2nd report: study on propeller slipstream and actual ship performance. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 165:43–53 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ouchi K (1992) Effect and application of propeller boss cap fins (PBCF). J MESJ 27(9):768–778 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atlar M, Patience G (1998) An investigation into effective boss cap designs to eliminate propeller hub vortex cavitation. In: Proceedings of practical design of ship and mobile units, Elsevier Science BV, pp 757–769

  5. Nojiri T, Ishii N, Kai H (2011) Energy saving technology of propeller boss cap fins (PBCF) and its evolution. J JIME 46(3):350–358

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen HR, Dinham-Peren T, Nojiri T (2011) Model and Full Scale Evaluation of a ‘Propeller Boss Cap Fins’ Device Fitted to an Aframax Tanker. In: Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, smp’11, Hamburg, Germany

  7. The Specialist Committee on Unconventional Propulsors (1999) Final Report and Recommendations to the 22nd ITTC, pp 311–346

  8. Kawamura T, Omori T (2009) Reynolds number effect on propeller performance in open water. J Jpn Soc Nav Archit Ocean Eng 10:29–36 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kawamura T, Watanabe T, Takekoshi Y, Maeda M, Yamaguchi H (2004) Numerical simulation of cavitating flow around a propeller. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 195:211–219 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhee SH, Kawamura T, Li H (2005) Propeller cavitation study using an unstructured grid based Navier-Stokes solver. J Fluids Eng 127:986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawamura T (2011) Numerical simulation of propulsion and cavitation performance of marine propellers. J JIME 46(3):359–365

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsin C-Y, Lin B-H, Chang C-H, Lin C–C (2008) The analysis and design of PBCF by computation. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific workshop on marine hydrodynamics APHydro 2008, Taipei

  13. Yamasaki S (1989) Propeller performance characteristics in ship stern flow field: 1st report: effects of ship wake and flow contraction by propeller. Transact West Jpn Soc Nav Archit 78:101–111 (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takafumi Kawamura.

About this article

Cite this article

Kawamura, T., Ouchi, K. & Nojiri, T. Model and full scale CFD analysis of propeller boss cap fins (PBCF). J Mar Sci Technol 17, 469–480 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-012-0181-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-012-0181-2

Keywords

Navigation