Skip to main content
Log in

Computational investigation of cavitation on a semi-spade rudder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines noncavitating and cavitating flow fields around a semi-spade rudder in the ship wake and propeller slipstream based on a computational method. The article seeks to explain the erosion that can occur around the gap due to cavitation; such erosion has been reported to occur while a ship is at sea. Another area of research is the effect of the gap size and shape. The effects of erosion-evading devices such as elongated gap edges, an increased edge radius, flow control projections, and vertical and horizontal guide plates were also studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lasson L (ed) (1981) SSPA-ITTC workshop on ship boundary layers. SSPA report, no. 90. SSPA Publication, Gothenburg, Sweden

  2. Lasson L, Patel VC, Dyne G (eds) (1991) Flowtech research report, no. 2. Flowtech International, Gothenburg, Sweden

  3. Kodama Y (ed) (1994) Proceedings of CFD workshop 1994, Tokyo, Japan

  4. Lasson L, Stern F, Bertram V (eds) (2000) A workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  5. Hino T (ed) (2005) Proceedings of CFD workshop 2005, Tokyo, Japan

  6. Lübke LO (2005) Numerical simulation of the flow around a propelled KCS container ship. In: Proceedings of CFD workshop 2005, Tokyo, Japan

  7. Stern F, Kim HT, Chen HC (1988) Viscous-flow approach to the computation of propeller–hull interaction. J Ship Res 32(4):246–262

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawamura T, Miyata H, Mashimo K (1997) Numerical simulation of the flow about self-propelling tanker model. J Mar Sci Technol 2:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi JK, Kinnas SA (2001) Prediction of non-axisymmetric effective wake by a three-dimensional Euler solver. J Ship Res 45:13–33

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim J, Park IR, Kim KS, Van SH (2005) RANS computation of turbulent free surface flow around a self-propelled KLNG carrier (in Korean). J Soc Naval Arch Korea 42:583–592

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simonsen CD, Stern F (2005) RANS maneuvering simulation of Esso Osaka with rudder and a body-force propeller. J Ship Res 49(2):98–120

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tahara Y, Wilson RV, Carrica PM, Stern F (2006) RANS simulation of a container ship using a single-phase level-set method with overset grids and the prognosis for extension to a self-propulsion simulator. J Mar Sci Technol 11:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi JE, Kim JH, Lee HG, Choi BJ, Lee DH (2009) Computational predictions of ship-speed performance. J Mar Sci Technol 14(3):322–333

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik BG, Kim KY, Ahn JW, Kim YS, Kim SP, Park JJ (2008) Experimental study on the gap entrance profile affecting rudder gap cavitation. Ocean Eng 35(1):139–14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shen YT, Jiang CW, Remmers KD (1997) A twisted rudder for reduced cavitation. J Ship Res 41(4):260–272

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kinnas SA, Lee H, Gu H, Natarajan S (2007) Prediction of sheet cavitation on a rudder subject to propeller flow. J Ship Res 51(1):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rhee SH, Kim HC (2008) A suggestion of gap flow control devices for the suppression of rudder cavitation. J Mar Sci Technol 13(4):356–370

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Gridgen User Manual Version 15 (2003) Pointwise Inc.

  19. Fluent 6.3 User's Guide (2008) Fluent Inc.

  20. Choi JK, Kinnas SA (2003) Prediction of unsteady effective wake by an Euler solver/vortex-lattice coupled method. J Ship Res 47:131–144

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leonard BP, Mokhtari S (1990) ULTRA-SHARP nonoscillatory convection schemes for high-speed steady multidimensional flow. NASA TM 1-2568 (ICOMP-90-12), NASA Lewis Research Center

  22. Patankar SV, Spalding DB (1972) A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. Int J Heat Mass Trans 15:1787–1806

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen YT, Dimotakis PE (1989) The influence of surface cavitation on hydrodynamic forces. In: Proceedings of 22nd American Towing Tank Conference, St. John’s, Canada

  25. Kim SE, Brewton S (2008) A multiphase approach to turbulent cavitating flow. In: Proceedings of 27th symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea

  26. Jessup SD (1989) An experimental investigation of viscous aspects of propeller blade flow. PhD. Thesis, MIT, Department of Ocean Engineering, USA

  27. Min KS, Choi JE, Kim JH, Seo HW (2008) Resistance and self-propulsive characteristics of various commercial ships based on the CFD results. In: Proceedings of 27th symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Eun Choi.

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, JE., Kim, JH. & Lee, HG. Computational investigation of cavitation on a semi-spade rudder. J Mar Sci Technol 15, 64–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-009-0074-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-009-0074-1

Keywords

Navigation