Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Eindeutige Studienlage spricht gegen das Belassen eines Saphenastumpfes

Conclusive studies are against leaving a saphenous vein stump

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Leserbriefe to this article was published on 01 September 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Pannier F, Noppeney T, Alm J, et al. Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Varikose AWMF-Register Nr. 037/018 Stand: 31. März 2019 , gültig bis 30. März 2024

  2. Park I, Kim D (2020) Correlation between the immediate remnant stump length and vein diameter after cyanoacrylate closure using the venaseal system during treatment of an incompetent great Saphenous vein. Vasc Endovascular Surg 54(1):47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rits J, Maurins U, Rabe E et al (2022) Lower prevalence of stump reflux after endovenous laser flush ablation of the great saphenous vein A single center prospective randomized study. Vasa 51(4):222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achim Mumme.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Mumme gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mumme, A. Eindeutige Studienlage spricht gegen das Belassen eines Saphenastumpfes. Gefässchirurgie 27, 469–471 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-022-00926-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-022-00926-w

Navigation