Skip to main content
Log in

Stellenwert xenogener Materialien als Aortenersatz im Infekt

Importance of xenograft materials for aortic replacement in infections

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Xenogene und biosynthetische Materialien werden im klinischen Alltag zunehmend als Gefäßersatzmaterial im Infekt eingesetzt. Insbesondere die hohe Infektresistenz, die gute Handhabbarkeit und die Verfügbarkeit haben zu einer Verbreitung der Anwendung geführt. Die wissenschaftlichen Daten basieren weiterhin überwiegend auf retrospektiven Analysen kleiner Patientengruppen.

Abstract

Xenografts and biosynthetic materials are increasingly being used as vascular replacement materials in infected surgical fields. The high resistance against reinfection, the good handling and the availability in particular have contributed to the increasing use. The scientific data is still mainly based on retrospective studies of small groups of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Hiroshi Kubota, Hidehito Endo, Mio Noma, Hikaru Ishii, Hiroshi Tsuchiya, Akihiro Yoshimoto, Yu Takahashi, Yusuke Inaba, Yoshifumi Nishino, Masao Nunokawa, Yutaka Hosoi, Tooru Ikezoe, Masaru Nemoto, Yoshihisa Makino, Yoko Nemoto, Mitsuru Matsukura, Masanori Sugiyama, Nobutsugu Abe, Hirohisa Takeuchi, Gen Nagao, Eri Kondo, Osamu Yanagida, Hideaki Yoshino, Kenichi Sudo (2015) Xenopericardial roll graft replacement for infectious pseudoaneurysms and graft infections of the aorta. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 10(1)

  2. Czerny M, Allmen R von, Opfermann P, Sodeck G, Dick F, Stellmes A, Carrel T et al (2011) Self-made pericardial tube graft: a new surgical concept for treatment of graft infections after thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures. The Annals of thoracic surgery 92(5):1657–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lutz B, Reeps C, Biro G, Knappich C, Zimmermann A, Eckstein HH (2017) Bovine pericardium as new technical option for in situ reconstruction of aortic graft infection. Annals of vascular surgery 41:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss S, Tobler EL, Tengg-Kobligk H von, Makaloski V, Becker D, Carrel TP, Wyss TR et al (2017) Self made xeno-pericardial aortic tubes to treat native and aortic graft infections. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 54(5):646–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anibueze C, Sankaran V, Sadat U et al (2017) Neoaortic xenoprosthetic grafts for treatment of mycotic aneurysms and infected aortic grafts. Ann Vasc Surg 44:419.e1–419.e12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreibich M, Siepe M, Morlock J et al (2018) Surgical treatment of native and prosthetic aortic infection with xenopericardial tube grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 106:498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Belkorissat RA, Sadoul C, Bouziane Z et al (2020) Tubular reconstruction with bovine pericardium xenografts to treat native aortic infections. Ann Vasc Surg 64:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Almási-Sperling V, Heger D, Meyer A, Lang W, Rother U (2020) Treatment of aortic and peripheral prosthetic graft infections with bovine pericardium. J Vasc Surg 71:592–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alonso W, Ozdemir B, Chassin-Trubert L, Ziza V, Alric P, Canaud L (2020) Early outcomes of native and graft-related abdominal aortic infection managed with orthotopic xenopericardial grafts. J Vasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Odero A, Argenteri A, Cugnasca M, Pirelli S (1997) The crimped bovine pericardium bioprosthesis in graft infection: preliminary experience. Eur J Vasc Endovascular Surg 14:99–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto H, Yamamoto F, Ishibashi K, Chida Y, Minamiya Y, Nanjo H (2009) In situ replacement of the thoracic aorta using an equine pericardial roll graft for an aortobronchial fistula due to aortic rupture. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto H, Yamamoto F, Ishibashi K, Motokawa M (2009) In situ replacement with equine pericardial roll grafts for ruptured infected aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 49:1041–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hostalrich A, Ozdemir BA, Sfeir J, Solovei L, Alric P, Canaud L (2019) Systematic review of native and graft-related aortic infection outcome managed with orthotopic xenopericardial grafts. J Vasc Surg 69:614–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Betz T, Neuwerth D, Steinbauer M, Uhl C, Pfister K, Töpel I (2019) Biosynthetic vascular graft: a valuable alternative to traditional replacement materials for treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infection. Scand J Surg 108:291–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krasznai AG, Snoeijs MGJ, Siroen MP et al (2016) Treatment of aortic graft infection by in situ reconstruction with Omniflow II biosynthetic prosthesis. Vascular 24:561–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Töpel.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

I. Töpel, M. Steinbauer und T. Betz geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Töpel, I., Steinbauer, M. & Betz, T. Stellenwert xenogener Materialien als Aortenersatz im Infekt. Gefässchirurgie 25, 649–651 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-020-00714-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-020-00714-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation