Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of retrograde type A aortic dissection after TEVAR

A systematic review. English version

Retrograde Typ-A-Aortendissektion nach TEVAR: Inzidenz, Risikofaktoren und Outcome

Ein systematischer Review

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has recently been recognized as a new pathophysiological entity. Little is known about its incidence, risk factors, and outcome.

Methods

Electronic searches were performed in Medline until 8 November 2013. Relevant studies were identified. We looked for consecutive series reporting on incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Registries were excluded. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined outcome measures.

Results

Sixteen studies were identified for inclusion for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The incidence of retrograde type A aortic dissection after TEVAR was given in all 16 studies and was between 1.3 and 24 %. Incidence varied substantially with regard to the underlying aortic pathology treated as well as with regard to the application or non-application of supra-aortic transpositions prior to TEVAR. The strong association between acute aortic syndromes and retrograde type A aortic dissection was consistent in all other studies, being highest in the combination of an acute aortic syndrome and supra-aortic rerouting prior to TEVAR (24 %). Both proven and suspected pathophysiological mechanisms causing retrograde type A aortic dissection were consistent in all studies. The time interval between TEVAR and the occurrence of retrograde type A aortic dissection varied between immediate occurrence during the procedure and up to 7 years after treatment. Outcome varied according to the time of occurrence, being best in patients who were treated surgically where the diagnosis was made in hemodynamically stable conditions.

Conclusion

Retrograde type A aortic dissection after TEVAR is not rare in patients with the underlying pathology of type B aortic dissection, type B intramural hematoma as well as after total arch rerouting aimed for zone 0 landing zone deployment. Retrograde type A aortic dissection after TEVAR may occur early or late. Further studies are needed to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms and to prevent this complication in the future.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Vor kurzem wurde die retrograde Typ-A-Aortendissektion nach TEVAR als neue pathophysiologische Entität anerkannt. Zu Inzidenz, Risikofaktoren und Outcome ist noch wenig bekannt.

Methoden

Bis zum 08.11.2013 wurde in der Datenbank Medline recherchiert, für die Fragestellung relevante Studien wurden identifiziert. Gesucht wurde nach Fallserien mit Dokumentation von Inzidenz, Risikofaktoren und Outcome. Nach vordefinierten Outcome-Kriterien wurden Daten extrahiert und analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Für die qualitativen und quantitativen Analysen wurden 16 Studien herangezogen. Die Inzidenz einer retrograden Typ-A-Aortendissektion nach TEVAR war in sämtlichen Studien angegeben, sie lag zwischen 1,3 und 24 %. Die Inzidenz war je nach zugrundeliegender aortaler Pathologie und je nach (Nicht-)Anwendung supraaortaler Transpositionen vor der Intervention sehr unterschiedlich. Die deutliche Assoziation zwischen akuten Aortensyndromen und retrograder Typ-A-Aortendissektion war konsistent in allen anderen Studien zu finden, am höchsten war sie bei der Kombination akutes Aortensyndrom und supraaortalem „Rerouting“ vor TEVAR (24 %). Nachgewiesene und angenommene pathophysiologische Mechanismen, die eine retrograde Typ-A-Aortendissektion verursachen, waren in sämtlichen Studien konsistent. Zwischen TEVAR und retrograder Typ-A-Aortendissektion lagen sehr verschiedene Zeitintervalle: zwischen sofortigem Eintreten schon während der Behandlung bis zu 7 Jahren postinterventionell. Das Outcome war je nach Zeitpunkt des Auftretens unterschiedlich: Am günstigsten war es bei chirurgisch behandelten Patienten wo die Diagnosestellung unter hämodynamisch stabilen Bedingungen erfolgt ist.

Fazit

Bei Patienten mit den zugrundeliegenden Pathologien Typ-B-Aortendissektion und/bzw. intramurales Typ-B-Hämatom, ferner nach komplettem Aortenbogenumbau, kommt es nicht selten nach TEVAR zu einer retrograden Typ-A-Aortendissektion. Sie kann früh oder spät TEVAR auftreten. Weitere Untersuchungen sind erforderlich, um die pathophysiologischen Mechanismen zu klären und dieser Komplikation künftig vorzubeugen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eggebrecht H, Thompson M, Rousseau H et al (2009) Retrograde ascending aortic dissection during or after thoracic aortic stent graft placement: insight from the European registry on endovascular aortic repair complications. Circulation 120(11 Suppl):S276–S281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong ZH, Fu WG, Wang YQ et al (2009) Retrograde type A aortic dissection after endovascular stent graft placement for treatment of type B dissection. Circulation 119:735–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Misfeld M, Nötzold A, Geist V et al (2002) Retrograde type A dissection after endovascular stent grafting of type B dissection. Z Kardiol 91:274–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Totaro M, Miraldi F, Fanelli F, Mazzesi G (2001) Emergency surgery for retrograde extension of type B dissection after endovascular stent graft repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:1057–1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabenwoger M, Fleck T, Ehrlich M et al (2004) Secondary surgical interventions after endovascular stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:608–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz E, Langs G, Holfeld J et al (2011) Quantifying the effects of stent-grafting in the thoracic aorta based on a motion manifold. Med Image Anal

  7. Cochennec F, Tresson P, Cross J et al (2013) Hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections. J Vasc Surg 57:1560–1567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Idrees J, Arafat A, Johnston DR et al (2013) Repair of retrograde ascending dissection after descending stent grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (Epub ahead of print)

  9. Gorlitzer M, Weiss G, Moidl R et al (2012) Repair of stent graft-induced retrograde type A aortic dissection using the E-vita open prosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:566–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luehr M, Etz CD, Lehmkuhl L et al (2013) Surgical management of delayed retrograde type A aortic dissection following complete supra-aortic de-branching and stent-grafting of the transverse arch. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:958–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen ND, Williams JB, Hanna JM et al (2013) Results with an algorithmic approach to hybrid repair of the aortic arch. J Vasc Surg 57:655–667

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams JB, Andersen ND, Bhattacharya SD et al (2012) Retrograde ascending aortic dissection as an early complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 55:1255–1262

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Geisbüsch P, Kotelis D, Müller-Eschner M et al (2011) Complications after hybrid arch repair. J Vasc Surg 53:935–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kpodonu J, Preventza O, Ramaiah VG et al (2008) Retrograde type A dissection after endovascular stenting of the descending thoracic aorta. Is the risk real? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:1014–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Steingruber IE, Chemelli A, Glodny B et al (2008) Endovascular repair of acute type B aortic dissection: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 15:150–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Rango P, Cao P, Ferrer C et al (2013) Aortic arch debranching and thoracic endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg (Epub ahead of print)

  17. Neuhauser B, Greiner A, Jaschke W et al (2008) Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type B dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:58–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrlich MP, Dumfarth J, Schoder M et al (2010) Midterm results after endovascular treatment of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 90:1444–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andacheh ID, Donayre C, Othman F et al (2012) Patient outcomes and thoracic aortic volume and morphologic changes following endovascular aortic repair in patients with complicated chronic type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 56:644–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Czerny M, Weigang E, Sodeck G et al (2012) Targeting landing zone 0 by total arch rerouting and TEVAR: midterm results of a transcontinental registry. Ann Thorac Surg 94:84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weigang E, Parker JA, Czerny M et al (2011) Should intentional endovascular stent-graft coverage of the left subclavian artery be preceded by prophylactic revascularisation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:858–868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bavaria J, Vallabhajosyula P, Moeller P et al (2013) Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145(3 Suppl):S85–S90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fedak PW, Verma S, David TE et al (2002) Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 106:900–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Girdauskas E, Disha K, Raisin HH et al (2012) Risk of late aortic events after an isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant ascending aortic dilation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:832–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loewe C, Czerny M, Sodeck GH et al (2012) A new mechanism by which an acute type B aortic dissection is primarily complicated, becomes complicated, or remains uncomplicated. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dziodzio T, Juraszek A, Reineke D et al (2011) Experimental acute type B aortic dissection: different sites of primary entry tears cause different ways of propagation. Ann Thorac Surg 91:724–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest. M. Czerny, M. Rieger, and J. Schmidli state that there are no conflicts of interest. The accompanying manuscript does not include studies on humans or animals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Czerny MD, MBA.

Additional information

M. Czerny and M. Rieger contributed equally to this work. The German version of this article is published in Gefässchirurgie DOI 10.1007/s00772-014-1412-0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czerny, M., Rieger, M. & Schmidli, J. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of retrograde type A aortic dissection after TEVAR. Gefässchirurgie 20 (Suppl 1), 45–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1389-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1389-8

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation