Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Aktueller Stellenwert der ceMR-Angiographie am Unterschenkel

  • Fragen aus der Praxis
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Bonel HM, Saar B, Hoppe H, Kickuth R et al (2009) MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterieal occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: Diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA. Radiology 253(3):879–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosiers M, Hart JP, Deloose K et al (2006) Endovascular therapy as the primary approach for limb salvage in patients with crirical limb ischemia: experience with 443 infrapopliteal procedures. Vascular 14:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bremerich J, Bilecenn Reimer P (2007) MR-angiography with blood pool contrast agents. Eur Radiol 17:3017–3024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chomel S, Douek P, Moulin P et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the foot: anatomy and clinical application in patients with diabetes. AJR 182:1435–1442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins R, Cranny G, Westwood M et al (2007) A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess II 20:1–202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giovagnoni A, Catalano C (2007) Application of blood-pool agents in visualization of peripheral vessels. Eur Radiol Suppl 17(Suppl 2):B18–B23

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hadizadeh DR, Gieseke J, Lohmaier S et al (2008) Peripheral MR angiography with blood pool contrast agent: prospective intraindividual comparative study of high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR aversus standard-resolution first-pass MR angiography and DSA. Radiology 249(2):701–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease. Circulation 113:e463–e654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofmann WJ, Forstner R, Kofler B et al (2002) Pedal artery imaging – a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24:287–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes K; Domenig CM, Hamdan AD et al (2004) Bypass to plantar and tarsal arteries: an acceptable approach to limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 40:1149–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kos S, Reisinger C, Aschwanden M et al (2009) Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass IV contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR 192:775–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, Thelaen M et al (2000) Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of contrast- enhanced-three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction. AJR 174:171–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawall H, Diehm C, Pittrow P (Hrsg) (2009) Leitlinien zur Diagnostik und Therapie der peripheren arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit (pAVK). Vasa (Suppl. S) 75:20–21

  14. Leiner T, Goyen M, Rohrer M et al (2008) Clinical blood pool MR Imaging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio

  15. Prince MR, Zhang HL, Prowda JC et al (2009) Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis and its impact on abdominal imaging. RadioGraphics 29:1565–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenskonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenskonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Deutschland

    F. Verrel

  2. Radiologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland

    D. Hadizadeh, K. Wilhelm & W. Willinek

Authors
  1. F. Verrel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Hadizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Wilhelm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Willinek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Verrel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verrel, F., Hadizadeh, D., Wilhelm, K. et al. Aktueller Stellenwert der ceMR-Angiographie am Unterschenkel. Gefässchirurgie 16, 49–54 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-010-0869-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-010-0869-8

Search

Navigation