Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Interventionelle Therapie der Beckenetage

Endovascular therapy of iliac obstructions

  • Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die endovaskuläre Therapie hat sich neben der chirurgischen Therapie in der Behandlung iliakaler Gefäßobstruktionen etabliert. In dieser Übersicht wird die Rolle der jeweiligen Therapiemöglichkeit in Bezug auf Läsionscharakteristik und/oder Stadium der Gefäßerkrankung behandelt. Außerdem werden die derzeit zur Verfügung stehenden endovaskulären Therapieoptionen sowohl in Bezug auf Effektivität (technischer Erfolg und Offenheitsraten) als auch in Bezug auf Kosteneffektivität diskutiert.

Abstract

Endovascular therapy of iliac obstructions has established itself as a complementary option to surgical revascularization. Both approaches should be individually tailored based on the severity of the patients disease and health status as well as lesion characterization. This review discusses the role of the endovascular approach and its value in the treatment of iliac obstruction, as well as the cost effectiveness of surgical and endovascular procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Ali AT et al. (2003) Emerging role of endovascular grafts in complex aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 38: 486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballard JL et al. (1998) Aortoiliac stent deployment versus surgical reconstruction: analysis of outcome and cost. J Vasc Surg 28: 94–101; discussion 101–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balzer JO et al. (2005) Percutaneous interventional reconstruction of the iliac arteries: primary and long-term success rate in selected TASC C and D lesions. Eur Radiol

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becker GJ et al. (1989) Early experience with the Palmaz stent in human iliac angioplasty. Indiana Med 82: 286–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosch JL et al. (2000) Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease in the United States. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 517–521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch JL et al. (1998) Iliac arterial occlusive disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Radiology 208: 641–648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosch JL, Hunink MG (1997) Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Radiology 204: 87–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckley CJ et al. (2002) Intravascular ultrasound scanning improves long-term patency of iliac lesions treated with balloon angioplasty and primary stenting. J Vasc Surg 35: 316–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB (2000) Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 31: S1–S296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Funovics MA et al. (2002) Predictors of long-term results after treatment of iliac artery obliteration by transluminal angioplasty and stent deployment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25: 397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lammer J et al. (2000) Peripheral arterial obstruction: prospective study of treatment with a transluminally placed self-expanding stent-graft. International Trial Study Group. Radiology 217: 95–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maynar M et al. (2005) Bifurcated endoprosthesis for treatment of aortoiliac occlusive lesions. J Endovasc Ther 12: 22–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mouanoutoua M et al. (2003) Endovascular intervention of aortoiliac occlusive disease in high-risk patients using the kissing stents technique: long-term results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60: 320–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Navarro F, Sullivan TM, Bacharach JM (2000) Intravascular ultrasound assessment of iliac stent procedures. J Endovasc Ther 7: 315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmaz JC et al. (1988) Intraluminal stents in atherosclerotic iliac artery stenosis: preliminary report of a multicenter study. Radiology 168: 727–731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raillat C et al. (1990) Treatment of iliac artery stenoses with the Wallstent endoprosthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154: 613–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tetteroo E et al. (1998) Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Lancet 351: 1153–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tetteroo E et al. (1996) Stent placement after iliac angioplasty: comparison of hemodynamic and angiographic criteria. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Radiology 201: 155–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Timaran CH et al. (2001) External iliac and common iliac artery angioplasty and stenting in men and women. J Vasc Surg 34: 440–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Timaran CH et al. (2002) Predictors for adverse outcome after iliac angioplasty and stenting for limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 36: 507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Timaran CH et al. (2003) Iliac artery stenting in patients with poor distal runoff: Influence of concomitant infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 38: 479–484, discussion 484–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Timaran CH et al. (2003) Iliac artery stenting versus surgical reconstruction for TASC (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus) type B and type C iliac lesions. J Vasc Surg 38: 272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vorwerk D et al. (1995) Primary stent placement for chronic iliac artery occlusions: follow-up results in 103 patients. Radiology 194: 745–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Whatling PJ et al. (2000) Iliac occlusions: stenting or crossover grafting? An examination of patency and cost. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 20: 36–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrales Institut für Radiologie/LKH Feldkirch

    M. Cejna

  2. Zentrales Institut für Radiologie/LKH Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, A-6807, Feldkirch

    M. Cejna

Authors
  1. M. Cejna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Cejna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cejna, M. Interventionelle Therapie der Beckenetage. Gefässchirurgie 10, 433–444 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-005-0432-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-005-0432-1

Keywords

Keywords

Search

Navigation