Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostik von infizierten Aortenprothesen und die Option zu einem konservativen Management mit Hilfe der perkutanen Drainage

  • Der interessante Fall
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Infektion einer Aortenprothese ist eine seltene aber lebensbedrohliche Komplikation. Das übliche Vorgehen besteht in der Entfernung der infizierten Prothese, der extraanatomischen Rekonstruktion bzw. dem Einsatz von homologen Ersatzmaterialien. Alternativ kann die Revaskularisation mit körpereigenen Venen und Arterien durchgeführt werden. Alle Operationstechniken weisen gerade in der septischen Phase eine hohe Morbidität und Mortalität auf.

Eine weitere meist unbekannte Behandlungsmöglichkeit der infizierten Aortenprothese besteht in dem perkutanen Einbringen einer Drainage in Kombination mit einer gezielten mehrfachen Antibiose, die sich aus der mikrobiologischen Analyse des putriden Punktats und der möglichen Resistenzbestimmung ergibt. Die Drainagenbehandlung kann zumindest initial eine wertvolle Behandlungsoption sein, da sie bei geringer Komplikationsrate eine kurative Chance aufweist, zumindest Zeit gewinnen hilft und erst nach ihrem Versagen die chirurgischen Operationstechniken unter optimierten Bedingungen elektiv eingesetzt werden müssen.

Abstract

Graft infection is an uncommon but potentially lethal complication of aortic repair. The standard operation is to remove of the infected aortic graft followed by extra-anatomic reconstruction or the use of homologous graft material. A possible alternative method is the application of femoropopliteal veins and arteries to revascularize the abdominal aorta. All surgical procedures have a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

A further, largely unknown possibility to treat patients with an aortic graft infection is primary conservative drainage in combination with a specific multitherapeutic antibiotic regimen which is determined by microbiological analysis of the putrid puncture and by ascertaining antibiotic resistance. Percutaneous drainage seems to be a valuable tool in the initial treatment of aortic graft infection with less complications and the chance of a cure. In the case of failure, surgical revascularization procedures can be performed under improved or optimal conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1a
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Azakie A, McElhinney DB, Messina LM, Stoney RJ (1998) In situ autogenous reconstruction of an infected thoracoabdominal aortobifemoral bypass graft. J Vasc Surg 27: 977–980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belair M, Soulez G, Oliva VL et al. (1998) Aortic graft infection: the value of percutaneous drainage. AJR 171: 119–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benchekroun A, Lachkar A, Soumana A et al. (1997) Ureter injuries. Apropos 42 cases. Ann Urol 31: 267–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho JS, Gloviczi P, Martelli E (1998) Long-term survival and late complications after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 27: 813–819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S et al. (2002) Urinomas caused by ureteral injuries: CT appearance. Abdom Imaging 27: 88–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghali AM, El Malik EM, Ibrahim AI, Ismail G, Rashid M (1999) Ureteric injuries: diagnosis, management and outcome. J Trauma 46: 150–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaneda T, Iemura J, Oka H et al. (2001) Treatment of deep infection following thoracic aorta graft replacement without graft removal. Ann Vasc Surg 15: 430–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawashima T, Kamisawa O, Ohki S, Hasegawa N, Konishi H, Fuse K (1997) A case of successful treatment of mediastinitis and prosthetic graft infection after aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aortic reconstruction. Nippon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi 45/2: 220–224

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lambiase RE, Dorfman GS, Cronan JJ (1989) Percutaneous management of abscesses that involve native arteries or synthetic arterial grafts. Radiology 173: 815–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Medina D, Lavery R, Ross SE, Livingston DH (1998) Ureteral trauma: preoperative studies neither predict injury nor prevent missed injuries. J Am Coll Surg 186: 641–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Orton DF, LeVeen RF, Saigh JA et al. (2000) Aortic prosthetic graft infections: radiologic manifestations and implications for management. Radiographics 20: 977–993

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pistolese GR, Ippoliti A, Tuccimei I, Lorido A (1997) Conservative treatment of aortic graft infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 14: 47–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfeiffer T, Sandmann W (2002) Die endovaskuläre Therapie des abdominalen Aortenaneurysmas: Aus der Sicht des Gefäßchirurgen. Dtsch Ärztebl 17: 963–969

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen SF, Ledesma DF, Lopez JA, Jackson MR (2000) Repair of saccular aortic aneurysm with superficial femoral-popliteal vein in the presence of a pancreatic abscess. J Vasc Surg 32: 1215–1218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossi P, Arata FM, Salvatori FM, Bezzi M, Speziale F, Lauri D, Sbarigia E (1997) Prosthetic graft infection: diagnostic and therapeutic role of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8/2: 271–277

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sheehan MK, Shireman PK, Littooy FN, Baker WH (2001) Ureteral injury during aortic aneurysm repair by the retroperitoneal approach. Ann Vasc Surg 15: 481–484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Valentine RJ, Clagett GP (2001) Aortic graft infections: replacement with autogenous vein. Cardiovasc Surg 9: 419–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeager RA, Taylor LM, Moneta GL et al. (1999) Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection. J Vasc Surg 30: 76–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. York JW, Money SR (2001) Prevention and management of ureteral injuries during aortic surgery. Semin Vasc Surg 14: 266–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zalaquett R, Vidal P, Irarrazaval MJ et al. (2001) Infection of ascending aortic graft: treatment with surgical cleaning, graft preservation and transposition of muscle flaps. Report of two cases. Rev Med Chil 129: 196–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Moll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moll, R., Debus, S., Franke, S. et al. Diagnostik von infizierten Aortenprothesen und die Option zu einem konservativen Management mit Hilfe der perkutanen Drainage. Gefässchirurgie 8, 312–316 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-003-0298-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-003-0298-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation