Skip to main content
Log in

Die In-situ-Rekonstruktion nach bakterieller Infektion der infrarenalen Aorta

  • Der technische Tipp
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die bakterielle Aortitis ist mit einer hohen Letalität vergesellschaftet und stellt eine Komplikation systemischer oder auch lokalisierter Infektionen dar. Die Therapie umfasst In-situ oder extraanatomische Rekonstruktionen. Aufgrund der Seltenheit des Krankheitsbilds liegen keine größeren Serien oder gar vergleichende Studien vor. Ziel dieser Arbeit war, die Ergebnisse der In-situ-Prothesenimplantation hinsichtlich des Einheilens und rekurrenter Infekte zu untersuchen. Hierbei wird erstmalig die Verwendung einer silberbeschichteten Prothese beschrieben.

Zwischen Juni 1999 und November 2001 wurden 3 männliche Patienten—49, 67 und 75 Jahre alt—aufgrund einer bakteriellen Aortitis mit gedeckter Ruptur und infrarenalem Aneurysma spurium operiert. Bei 2 Patienten handelte es sich um einen serologisch nachgewiesenen Salmonelleninfekt, und einmal wurde ein extrem seltener Yersinieninfekt verifiziert. Es wurde zweimal eine silberimprägnierte Aortenrohrprothese und einmal eine aortobiiliakale Y-Prothese implantiert.

Nach In-situ Rekonstruktion, Ummantelung mit Antibiotikaträger und 8- bis 12-wöchiger postoperativer Antibiose kam es bei allen 3 Patienten zu einem guten Einheilen ohne Zeichen erneuter bakterieller Besiedelung. Die postoperativen Kontrollen erfolgten durch klinische Untersuchung, Sonographie und Computertomographie.

Unseres Erachtens ist die In-situ-Rekonstruktion mit silberbeschichteten Dacronprothesen nach retroperitonealem Débridement zur Wiederherstellung der Strombahn bei bakterieller Aortenwandinfektion mit gedeckter Ruptur die Therapie der Wahl, sofern keine ausgedehnte, purulente Infektion vorliegt. Zwingend erforderlich ist eine bis zu 3 Monate postoperativ dauernde Antibiose. Sollte es dennoch zu einem periprothetischem Infekt kommen, kann dann auf ein extraanatomisches Verfahren umgestiegen werden.

Abstract

Bacterial infection of the aorta has a high mortality rate. It is a complication of systemic or localized infections. The options for therapy include in situ or extra-anatomic reconstruction. There are no controlled or randomized studies comparing the different treatments because of a very low incidence. The aim of this study is to report the results, after in situ reconstruction, of recurrent infection. The use of a silver impregnated prosthesis is described for the first time in bacterial aortitis.

Between June 1999 and November 2001, we operated on three male patients, 49, 67 and 75 years old, with bacterial aortitis as well as rupture and infrarenal aortic aneurysm. In two cases, we detected a Samonella infection and the other patient suffered from an extremely rare Yersinia infection. We implanted two silver impregnated Dacron prostheses as tube grafts and one aorto-biiliac bifurcated Dacron graft.

All three patients showed primary healing without recurrent infection after in situ reconstruction, covering with an antibiotic carrier and a 3 months postoperative treatment with antibiotics. The follow-up consist of clinical examination, ultrasound and computed tomography.

We conclude that in situ reconstruction with silver impregnated Dacron prostheses combined with retroperitoneal debridement is an excellent therapy option for the treatment of a bacterial wall infection of the aorta with rupture but without a severe purulent infection. If a periprosthetic infection is observed in the future, the possibility of an extra-anatomic revascularisation still exists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Camiade C, Goldschmidt P, Koskas F et al. (2001) Optimization of the resistance of arterial allografts to infection: Comparative study with synthetic prosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg: 15: 186–196

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chiba Y, Muraoka R, Ihaya A et al. (1996) Surgical treatment of infected thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cardiovasc Surg 4: 476–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daenens K, Fourneau I, Nevelsteen A (2002) Ten year experience in autogenous reconstruction with superficial femoral vein in the treatment of aortofemoral prosthetic infections. Abstract book ESVS Meeting 2002, p 92

  4. Donald K, Woodson J, Hudson H, Menzoian JO (1996) Multiple mycotic pseudoaneurysm due to Yersinia enterocolitica: a report of a case and review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 10: 573–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbons CP, Ferguson CJ, Fligelstone LJ, Edwards K (2002) Experience with femoro-popliteal vein as a conduit for vascular reconstruction in infected fields. Abstract book ESVS Meeting 2002, p 90

  6. Gupta AK, Bandyk DF, Johnson BL (1996) In-situ repair of mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm with rifampicin-bonded gelatin impregnated Dacron grafts: a preliminary case report. J Vasc Surg 24: 472–476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes PD, Nasim A, London NJ et al. (1999) In-situ replacement of infected aortic grafts with rifampicin-bonded prosthesis: The Leicester experience. J Vasc Surg 30: 92–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu RB, Tsay YG, Wang SS, Chu SH (2002) Surgical treatment for primary infected aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. J Vasc Surg 36/4: 746–750

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jarrett F, Darlin RC, Mundth ED, Austen WG (1975) Experience with infected aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. Arch Surg 110: 1281–1286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz SG, Andros G, Kohl RD (1992) Salmonalla infections of the abdominal aorta. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175/2: 102–106

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khosrow A, Stallone R, Wong GD (2001) Mycotic (infected) aneurysm caused by streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Med 18: 317–320

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knipping L, Mangold G (1995) Bakterielle Infektionen der Aorta abdominalis. Chirurg 66: 887–889

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kramer S, Pamler R, Seifarth H et al. (2001) Endovascular grafting of traumatic aortic aneurysms in contaminated fields. J Endovasc Ther 8: 262–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krenzien J, Gußmann A (1998) Aortitis—ein seltenes Krankheitsbild. Gefäßchirurgie 3: 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leo PJ, Pearl J, Tsang W (1996) Mycotic aneurysm: a diagnostic challenge. Am J Emerg Med 14/1: 70–73

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leseche G, Castier Y, Petit MD et al. (2001) Long-term results of cryopreserved arterial allograft in infected prosthetic grafts and mycotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 34: 1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Yeager RA et al. (1998) Surgical treatment of infected aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg 175: 396–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore WS, Hall AD, Blaisdell FW (1971) Late results of axillo-femoral bypass grafting. Am J Surg 122: 148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mueller BT, Wegener OR, Grabitz K et al. (2001) Mycotic aneurysms of the thoracic and abdominal aorta and iliac arteries: experience with anatomic and extra-anatomic repair in 33 cases. J Vasc Surg 33/1: 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nevelsteen A, Lacoix H, Suy R (1995) Autogenous reconstruction with the lower extremity deep veins: An alternative treatment of prosthetic infection after reconstructive surgery for aortoiliac disease. J Vasc Surg 22: 129–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oderich GS, Panneton JM, Bower TC et al. (2001) Infected aortic aneurysms: aggressive presentation, complicated early outcome, but durable results. J Vasc Surg 34/5: 900–908

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oskoui R, Davis WA, Gomes MN (1993) Salmonella aortitis. Arch Intern Med 153: 517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Osler W (1885) The gulstonian lecturers on malignant endocarditis. Br Med J: 467–470

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parsons RE, Sanchez LA, Marin ML et al. (1996) Comparison of endovascular and conventional vascular prostheses in an experimental infection model. J Vasc Surg 24/6: 920–925

    Google Scholar 

  25. von Segesser LK, Vogt P, Genoni M, Lachat M, Turina M (1997) The infected aorta. J Card Surg 12: 256–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Semba CP, Sakai T, Slonim SM et al. (1998) Mycotic aneurysms of the thoracic aorta: repair with the use of endovascular stent grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9: 33–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sessa C, Farah I, Voirin L et al. (1997) Infected aneurysms of the infrarenal abdominal aorta: diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategy. Ann Vasc Surg 11/5: 453–463

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor LM, Deitz DM, McConnell DB, Porter JM (1988) Treatment of infected abdominal aneurysms by extraanatomic bypass, aneurysm excision and drainage. Am J Surg 155: 655–658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zegelman M, Günther G, Doermer A, Scholz L (2001) Silver...worth its weight in gold? A multicenter prospective investigation of a silver impregnated dacron prosthesis in graft infections. Kongressband Dtsch Gesell Chir: 478

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zühlke HV, Harnoss BM (1988) Die infizierte Arterie. In: Zühlke HV, Harnoss BM (Hrsg) Septische Gefäßchirurgie, Ueberreuter, Wien, S 147

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Wack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wack, C., Niedermeier, H. Die In-situ-Rekonstruktion nach bakterieller Infektion der infrarenalen Aorta. Gefässchirurgie 8, 317–321 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-003-0295-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-003-0295-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation