Skip to main content
Log in

A proficiency testing scheme to evaluate the effectiveness of laboratory sample reduction of a soil sample

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although proficiency testing (PT) schemes in analytical chemistry are intended to test the entire analytical process, the reality is that some aspects of the analytical process are often excluded from this evaluation. This paper will describe an approach to PT that is being employed by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation designed to test specific aspects of the analytical process that are not typically addressed. The example detailed describes a PT study that was designed to test the ability of participants to obtain a representative test sample from a laboratory sample that was intentionally prepared to have good between-sample homogeneity but poor within-sample homogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Jenkins JF, Grant CL, Brar GS, Thorne PG, Schumacher PW, Rannaey TA (1997) Sampling error associated with collection and analysis of soil samples at TNT-contaminated sites. Field Anal Chem Technol 1(3):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Zorzi P, Barbizzi S, Barbina M, Fajgelj A, Jacimovic R, Jeran Z, Menegon S, Pati A, Petruzzelli G, Sansone U, Van der Perk M (2007) Estimation of uncertainty arising from different soil sampling devices: the use of variogram parameters. Chemosphere 70(5):745–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurfürst U, Desaules A, Rehnert A, Muntau H (2004) Estimation of measurement uncertainty by the budget approach for heavy metal content in soils under different land use. Accred Qual Assur 9(1):64–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen L, Dahl CK, Esbensen KH (2004) Representative mass reduction in sampling—a critical survey of techniques and hardware. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 74:95–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerlach RW, Dobb DE, Raab GA, Nocerino JN (2002) Gy sampling theory in environmental studies i: assessing soil splitting protocols. J Chemom 16(7):871–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyn JA, Ramsey MH, Fussell RJ, Wood R (2003) Measurement uncertainty from physical sample preparation: estimation including systematic error. Analyst 128:1391–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 13528 (2015) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. EPA (2003) Guidance for obtaining representative laboratory analytical subsamples from particulate laboratory samples. (EPA/600/R-03/027) Office of Research and Development

  9. Eurachem/EUROLAB/CITAC/Nordtest/AMC (2007) Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling: a guide to methods and approaches. ISBN: 978 0 948926 26 6

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Harold Malle, Lois Esler and Halka Klement of the Environmental Science and Technology Laboratories, Environment and Climate Change Canada, for assistance in the design of the PT scheme and in the production, characterization and shipping of the PT samples used for this examination.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Middlebrook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Middlebrook, K. A proficiency testing scheme to evaluate the effectiveness of laboratory sample reduction of a soil sample. Accred Qual Assur 24, 137–143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1357-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1357-1

Keywords

Navigation