Abstract
A summary of the working group discussions on proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment (EQA) held at the Eurachem Workshop, Portorož, Slovenia, 9–12 October 2017, is provided. The working groups covered a range of issues concerned with current practice and future directions; the importance of interpretative PT/EQA schemes; changes to PT/EQA schemes in developing countries over the last 10 years; implementing ISO/IEC 17043 for sampling PT/EQA schemes; traditional versus virtual PT/EQA items; experience of the implementation of EA-4/18; and use and treatment of measurement uncertainty in PT/EQA schemes. Delegates from fifty-two countries attended the workshop, and this diversity of different backgrounds was represented on each of the working groups to capture a range of views and experience from a number of different measurement sectors. Working group representatives included PT/EQA providers, participants in PT/EQA schemes, end users of PT/EQA results such as accreditation bodies and regulatory authorities, national measurement institutes, laboratory associations, suppliers, universities and independent consultants from countries around the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Mann I, Brookman B (eds) (2011) Eurachem guide: selection, use and interpretation of proficiency testing schemes, 2nd edn. www.eurachem.org
ISO/IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing. ISO, Geneva
ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva
EA-4/18:2010 Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation. www.european-accreditation.org. Accessed 17 Aug 2018
Örnemark U, Boley N, Saeed K et al (2001) Accred Qual Assur 6:140
Brookman B, Papadakis I, Squirrell A et al (2004) Accred Qual Assur 9:635
ISO/IEC 15189 (2007) Medical laboratories—requirements for quality and competence. ISO, Geneva
Kuselman I, Fajgelj A (2010) Pure Appl Chem 82(5):1099
Nordtest Report TR 537 (2011) Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, 3rd edn. www.nordtest.info
Ellison SLR, Williams A (eds) (2012) Eurachem/CITAC Guide CG4: Eurachem/CITAC Guide, quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 3rd edn. www.eurachem.org. Accessed 17 Aug 2018
Acknowledgements
The authors (who were convenors of the working groups) would like to thank all the attendees at the working groups. The views put forward during the working group discussions which are summarised in this paper do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the authors or their affiliations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher. A critical and constructive debate in the Discussion Forum or a Letter to the Editor is strongly encouraged!
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brookman, B., Butler, O., Ciaralli, L. et al. Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: discussions on current practice and future directions. Accred Qual Assur 24, 93–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1343-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1343-7