Skip to main content

Estimating sampling and analysis uncertainties to assess the fitness for purpose of a water quality monitoring network

Accreditation and Quality Assurance volume 21, pages 101–112 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

In order to verify that the protocols used for water quality monitoring of surface waters within the Long-term Environmental Research Monitoring and Testing System (OPE), located in the north-eastern part of France in relation with a geological disposal for radioactive waste project, are fit for purpose, a validation study was conducted following the methodology described in the Eurachem/citac and Nordtest guidance documents on uncertainty arising from sampling. As one of the objectives of the OPE water monitoring programme was to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of water quality, quality requirements were set to having a measurement variance, including sampling and analytical contributions, less than 20 % of the total variance to minimise the impact of measurement over the observed environmental variability. The replicate method was then selected in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty, including the sampling contribution, as well as the spatial and temporal variability of water quality of surface waters. To minimise costs, a single-split level was selected. Analytical uncertainties were assessed from inter-laboratory data and/or internal quality control data from the last 2–5 years. Finally, ANOVA was applied to the data sets after elimination of outliers. Results showed that for pH, electrical conductivity, turbidity and nitrate, the sampling uncertainty was negligible, whereas for other parameters such as dissolved oxygen, total suspend solids, total organic carbon, nitrite and phosphate, the sampling contribution to the measurement uncertainty was largely significant. For all parameters except calcium, the sampling and analytical protocols were considered fit for purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Harmancioglu NB, Fistikiglu O, Ozkul SD, Singh VP, Alpaslan MN (1999) Water quality monitoring network design. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanders TG, Ward RC, Loftis JC, Steele TD, Adrian DD, Yevjevich V (1983) Design of networks for monitoring water quality. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  3. Strobl RO, Robillard PD (2008) Network design for water quality monitoring of surface freshwaters: a review. J Environ Manage 87:639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steele TD (1987) Water quality monitoring strategies. Hydrol Sci J 32:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Analytical Methods Committee (2005) Analytical and sampling strategy, fitness for purpose, and computer games. AMC Technical Briefs 16A, The Royal Society of Chemistry, London

  6. Ramsey MH, Thompson M (2007) Uncertainty from sampling, in the context of fitness for purpose. Accred Qual Assur 12:503–513

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyn JA, Palestra IM, Ramsey MH, Damant PA, Word R (2007) Modifying uncertainty from sampling to achieve fitness for purpose: a case study on nitrate in lettuce. Accred Qual Assur 12:67–74

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrett RG (1969) The determination of sampling and analytical errors in exploration geochemistry. Econ Geol 64:568–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson M, Ramsey MH (1995) Quality concepts and practices applied to sampling: an exploratory study. Analyst 120:261–270

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EURACHEM/CITAC, Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling. First Edition (2007) Editors: Ramsey MH (University of Sussex, UK) and Ellison SLR (LGC, UK)

  11. Grøn C, Bjerre Hansen J, Magnusson B, Nordbotten A, Krysell M, Jebjerg Andersen K, Lund U(2007) Uncertainty from sampling—a nordtest handbook for sampling planners on sampling quality assurance and uncertainty estimation. Nordtest TR-604

  12. Ramsey MH, Thompson M, Hale M (1992) Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance. J Geochem Explor 44:23–36

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gy PM (1998) Sampling for analytical purposes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Zorzi P, Belli M, Barbizzi S, Menegon S, Deluisa A (2002) A practical approach to assessment of sampling uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 7:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurfurst U, Desaules A, Rehnert A, Muntau H (2004) Estimation of measurement uncertainty by the budget approach for heavy metal content in soils under different land use. Accred Qual Assur 9:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Minkkinen P (2004) Practical applications of sampling theory. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 74:85–94

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramsey MH (1998) Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources. J Anal Atom Spectrom 13:97–104

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramsey MH (1993) Sampling and analytical quality control, using robust analysis of variance. Appl Geochem 2:149–153

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Analytical Methods Committee (2009) The duplicate method for the estimation of measurement uncertainty arising from sampling. AMC technical briefs 40. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London

  20. Boon K, Ramsey MH (2010) Uncertainty of measurement or of mean value for the reliable classification of contaminated land. Sci Total Environ 409:423–429

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bodnar M, Namiesnik J, Konieczka P (2013) Validation of a sampling procedure. Trends Anal Chem 51:117–126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramsey MH, Argyraki A, Thompson M (1995) Estimation of sampling bias between different protocols on contaminated land. Analyst 120:1353–1356

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramsey MH, Argyriaki A (1997) Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: implications for the classification of contaminated land. Sci Total Environ 198:243–257

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramsey MH, Argyraki A, Thompson M (1995) On the collaborative trial in sampling. Analyst 120:2309–2317

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kurfurst U, Buczko U, Kleimeier C, Kuchenbuch RO (2011) Soil sampling uncertainty on arable fields estimated from reference sampling and a collaborative trial. Accred Qual Assur 16:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Squire S, Ramsey MH (2001) Inter-organisational sampling trials for the uncertainty estimation of landfill gas measurements. J Environ Monit 3:288–294

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gluschke M (2008) Collaborative sampling trial in the context of quality assurance in the German marine monitoring program for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. Accred Qual Assur 13:101–107

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Strub MP, Lepot B, Morin A (2009) Metrological aspects of collaborative field trials, including coping with unexpected events. Trends Anal Chem 28:245–261

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Botta F, Lepot B, Leoz-Garziandia E, Morin A (2012) Estimation of sampling uncertainty in lake-water monitoring in a collaborative field trial. Trends Anal Chem 36:176–184

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cotman M, Pintar A (2013) Sampling uncertainty of wastewater monitoring estimated in a collaborative field trial. Trends Anal Chem 51:71–78

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Argyraky A, Ramsey MH, Thompson M (1995) Proficiency testing in sampling: pilot study on contaminated land. Analyst 120:2799–2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guigues N, Desenfant M, Hance E (2013) Combining multivariate statistics and analysis of variance to redesign a water quality monitoring network. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:1692–1705

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. JCGM 200 (2012) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms, 3rd edn. http://www.bipm.org/vim

  34. JCGM 100 (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html

  35. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG4, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Third Edition (2012). Editors: Ellison SLR (LGC, UK) and Williams A (UK)

  36. Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M (2004) Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, edn 2. Nordtest TR-537

  37. ISO 11352 (2013) Water quality—estimation of measurement uncertainty based on validation and quality control data. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

  38. Guigues N, Desenfant M (2010) Définition et Expertise du réseau d’observation des eaux et des sédiments de la zone l’Observatoire Pérenne de l’Environnement. Partie I: Validation du plan d’échantillonnage du nouveau réseau d’observation. Rapport LNE: 70p (available from LNE on request—in French)

  39. ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

  40. ISO 5667-1 (2007) Water quality—sampling—part 1: guidance on the design of sampling programmes and sampling techniques. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

  41. FD T90-523-1 (2008) Qualité de l’eau—guide de prélèvement pour le suivi de la qualité des eaux dans l’environnement. Partie 1: Prélèvement d’eau superficielle. Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR), Paris

  42. ISO 5667-3 (2013) Water quality—sampling—part 3: preservation and handling of water samples. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

  43. Ghestem JP, Fisicaro P, Champion R (2009) Essai collaborative sur l’échantillonnage en eau souterraine. Aquaref. www.aquaref.fr

  44. Blanquet JP, Chatellier N, Strub MP, Lepot B (2007) Impact des opérations de prélèvements sur la variabilité des résultats d’analyse. Ineris DRC-07-86076-16167B. www.ineris.fr

  45. Blanquet JP, Botta F, Champion R, Ferret C, Guigues N, Lazzarotto J, Lepot B (2011) Impact des operations sur la variabilité des résultats d’analyses—Essai inter comparaison sur le prélèvement en plan d’eau 2010. Aquaref. www.aquaref.fr

  46. Lepot B, Ferret C, Blanquet JP (2013) Essai collaboratif d’intercomparaison sur le prélèvement en rejet canalisé pour la mesure des micropolluants. Aquaref. www.aquaref.fr

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LNE, 1 Rue Gaston Boissier, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France

    Nathalie Guigues, Michèle Desenfant, Béatrice Lalere & Sophie Vaslin-Reimann

  2. ASPECT Service Environnement, BP9, 57365, Ennery, France

    Damien Eyl & Philippe Mansuit

  3. ANDRA, Centre Meuse/Haute-Marne, RD 960, BP9, 55290, Bure, France

    Emmanuel Hance

Authors
  1. Nathalie Guigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michèle Desenfant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Béatrice Lalere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sophie Vaslin-Reimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Damien Eyl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philippe Mansuit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Emmanuel Hance
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Guigues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guigues, N., Desenfant, M., Lalere, B. et al. Estimating sampling and analysis uncertainties to assess the fitness for purpose of a water quality monitoring network. Accred Qual Assur 21, 101–112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1186-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1186-4

Keywords

  • Uncertainty arising from sampling
  • Uncertainty arising from analysis
  • Fitness for purpose of water quality monitoring