Skip to main content

Validation of a new measuring system for water turbidity field measurements

Abstract

Turbidity is an essential parameter for describing water quality by direct and indirect impacts on fish, invertebrates and aquatic plants. Currently, environmental monitoring measurements are carried out with appropriate quality by accredited testing laboratories, but there is also a need for employing the third sector, i.e. citizens and voluntaries in environmental monitoring. A device called “Secchi3000” was developed as a low-cost and simple-to-operate tool so that water quality measurements can also be carried out by non-experts and citizens. The measurement using the new device is simple: The user fills the container with water and places the measurement structure in the container. The user takes a photograph with the camera on a mobile phone through a hole in the lid. The software sends the photograph to a server, which analyses the photographs automatically. Finally, the results are returned to the user’s mobile phone and stored on a database for further analysis. In this study, the measuring system for turbidity measurements in natural waters was validated. Validation included an estimation of the limit of quantification, investigations of the influence of water colour and illumination conditions on turbidity measurement values and the estimation of measurement uncertainty. A comparison of turbidity results obtained with the new device and laboratory instrument in natural water samples was carried out, and turbidity values obtained with different mobile phones were compared. According to the validation results, the new device was appropriate for the measurement of turbidity lower than 7 FNU (Formazine Nephelometric Unit). An algorithm applied for present turbidity calculations is not fully suitable for higher turbidities. For potential routine use, this is not a major problem, since most Finnish natural waters have turbidities lower than 7 FNU. For official monitoring purposes, the limit of the quantification needs to be lower than presently achieved (1.7 FNU). Although the present configuration of the Secchi3000 device is not yet fully suitable for official environmental monitoring, it will already enable the involvement of the third sector in water quality monitoring, and in this way, citizens’ observations could then serve at least as supplementary information for reporting and surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/1299/2004. Act on Water Resources Management. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2004/en20041299.pdf

  2. 1299/2004, Act on Water Resources Management. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2004/en20041299.pdf

  3. Arola H (ed) Jatkuvatoiminen sameusmittaus—Hyvät mittauskäytännöt ja aineistonkäsittely (Continuous turbidity measurement—best measurement practices and data processing) (2012) Environmental Administration Guidelines 2/2012 (In Finnish), Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland

  4. Kerr SJ (1995) Silt, turbidity and suspended sediments in the aquatic environment: an annotated bibliography and literature review. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southern Region Science & Technology Transfer Unit Technical Report TR-008. Ontario, Canada, 277 pp

  5. Appleby JP, Scrarratt DJ (1989) Physical effects of suspended solids on marine and estuarine fish and shellfish with special reference to ocean dumping: a literature review. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 1681

  6. European Inland and Fisheries Advisory Commission (1964) Water quality criteria for European freshwater fish: report on finely divided solids and inland fisheries. J Air Water Pollut 9(3):151–168

    Google Scholar 

  7. Valkama P, Lahti K, Särkelä A (2007) Automaattinen veden laadun seuranta Lepsämänjoella. (Automated water quality monitoring in the river Lepsämänjoki), Terra 119: 3–4, 195–206. Department of Geosciences and geography, University of Helsinki, Finland 86/2000, Environmental Protection Act. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2000/en20000086.pdf

  8. 86/2000, Environmental Protection Act. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2000/en20000086.pdf

  9. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Technical Report—2009—025 Guidance Document No. 19 Guidance on Surface Water Chemical Monitoring under the Water Framework Directive. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/d/e54e8583-faf5-478f-9b11-41fda9e9c564/Guidance%20No%2019%20-%20Surface%20water%20chemical%20monitoring.pdf

  10. Monitoring Strategy of the State of the Environment (2020) (In Finnish), Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki 2011. http://www.ym.fi/download/noname/%7B4A092091-75FE-4090-B630-D24631212388%7D/32105

  11. ISO 7027: 1999 Water quality—determination of turbidity. International Organization for Standardization, 1999

  12. Toivanen T, Koponen S, Kotovirta V, Molinier M, Chengyuan P (2013) Water quality analysis using an inexpensive device and a mobile phone. Environ Syst Res 2:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. USEPA Method 180.1 (1993) Determination of turbidity by nephelometry, rev 2.0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  14. EN ISO 7887:2011 Water quality—examination and determination of colour. European Committee for Standardization, 2012

  15. B. Magnusson, T. Näykki, H. Hovind, M. Krysell (2012) Nordtest technical report 537: Handbook for the calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, 3.1 edn. Nordic Innovation, Oslo. www.nordtest.info

  16. EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, European Committee for Standardization, 2005

  17. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2002) Harmonized guidelines for single laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 74(5):835–855

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ISO 11352:2012, Water quality. Estimation of measurement uncertainty based on validation and quality control data, International Organization for Standardization, 2012

  19. EN 872:2005, Water quality. Determination of suspended solids. Method by filtration through glass fibre filters, European Committee for Standardization, 2005

  20. Näykki T, Virtanen A, Leito I (2012) Software support for the Nordtest method of measurement uncertainty evaluation. Accred Qual Assur 17:603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MUkit: Measurement uncertainty kit. http://www.syke.fi/en-US/Services/Calibration_services_and_contract_laboratory/MUkit__Measurement_Uncertainty_Kit

  22. GUM Workbench Pro, Version 2.4.0.241, Metrodata GmbH, Weil am Rhein, Germany

  23. JCGM 100 (2008) Evaluation of measurement data: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Available via www.bipm.org

  24. Eurachem/CITAC Guide CG 4 (2012) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 3rd edn. Available via www.eurachem.org

  25. Näykki T, Kyröläinen H, Witick A, Mäkinen I, Pehkonen R, Väisänen T, Sainio P, Luotola M (2013) Quality recommendations for data entered into the environmental administration’s water quality registers: quantification limits, measurement uncertainties, storage times and methods associated with analytes determined from waters (In Finnish), Environmental Administration Guidelines 4/2013, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/40920

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Cleen Ltd MMEA programme and Maa-ja vesitekniikan tuki ry are acknowledged for their financial support. This work has also been partially supported by the Graduate School “Functional materials and technologies” receiving funding from the European Social Fund under project 1.2.0401.09-0079 at the University of Tartu, Estonia. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement no. 263287. Rouvim Kadis from D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology (St. Petersburg) is acknowledged for reviewing the text from metrological point of view. Kirsi Mallat, Jaana Heiskanen, Sirpa Kuvaja and Suvi Paasinummi from SYKE laboratory are acknowledged for their invaluable work in laboratory turbidity measurements. Erika Varkonyi is acknowledged for the graphical work of the figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teemu Näykki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 172 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Näykki, T., Koponen, S., Väisänen, T. et al. Validation of a new measuring system for water turbidity field measurements. Accred Qual Assur 19, 175–183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1052-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1052-9

Keywords

  • Turbidity
  • Field measurement
  • Water quality monitoring
  • Citizen-based monitoring
  • Validation