Advertisement

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 637–642 | Cite as

Evaluation of measurement uncertainty components associated with results of radiochemical neutron activation analysis for determination of uranium traces

  • Ljudmila Benedik
  • Urška Repinc
Practitioner's Report

Abstract

Being aware of the importance to consider every step in the evaluation of the combined measurement uncertainty of the result, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the contribution of the radial thermal neutron flux gradient to the uncertainty budget for trace level uranium determination in biological materials by a radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RNAA). Determination of uranium via the short-lived nuclide 239U was based on solvent extraction with TBP and measurement of the chemical yield from the gamma-ray spectrum of the isolated fraction via 235U. It has been shown previously, that radial neutron flux gradient, could have a relevant effect on the final result obtained by RNAA. In the present work, radial neutron flux gradient within the irradiation assembly generally accepted in our lab (standards tapped beside the sample), varied between 93 and 108% around the mean value and contributes approximately 20% to the combined measurement uncertainty of the result.

Keywords

Radial neutron flux gradient Measurement uncertainty Radiochemical neutron activation analysis Uranium 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia within the research programme P1-0143.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenberg RR (2008) Pushing the limits of NAA: accuracy, uncertainty and detection limits. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim II, Watson RP, Lindstrom RM (2011) Accurate and precise measurement of selenium by instrumental neutron activation analysis. Anal Chem 83:3493–3498Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moreira EG, Vasconcellos MBA, Saiki M (2006) Uncertainty assessment in instrumental neutron activation analysis of biological materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 269:377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zeisler R, Lindstrom RM, Greenberg RR (2005) Instrumental neutron activation analysis: a valuable link in chemical metrology. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263:315–319Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Byrne AR, Benedik L (1988) Determination of uranium at trace levels by radiochemical neutron-activation analysis employing radiochemical yield evaluation. Talanta 35:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    IAEA-TECDOC-1592 (2008) reference Asian man: ingestion and organ content of trace elements of importance in radiological protectionGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawamura H, Parr RM, Dang HS, Tian W, Barnes RM, Iyengar GV (2000) Analytical quality assurance procedures developed for the IAEA’s reference Asian man project (phase 2). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaćimović R, Stibilj V, Benedik L, Smodiš B (2003) Characterization of the neutron flux gradients in typical irradiation channels of a TRIGA mark II reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 257:545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IAEA-TECDOC-1401 (2004) Quantifying uncertainty in nuclear analytical measurements. IAEAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kučera J, Bode P, Stepanek V (2000) The 1993 ISO guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement applied to NAA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benedik L, Byrne AR (1991) Trace uranium determination in foodstuffs and diets by radiochemical neutron activation analysis, 7th international symposium on trace elements in man and animals, TEMA-7. IMI ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4 (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, QUAM: 2000.1, http://www.eurachem.org
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Municipality of IdrijaIdrijaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations