Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 255–262 | Cite as

An approach for more precise statements of metrological traceability on reference material certificates

Discussion Forum

Abstract

Metrological traceability of measurement results is a key requirement for the comparability of such data in time and space and with legal or product specifications. Similarly, traceability of the certified values of a certified reference material (CRM) is a prerequisite for their usefulness. Consequently, a statement on metrological traceability of the certified value of the specified property is a requirement of the ISO Guide series on Reference Materials. The establishment of the traceability of a value assigned to a property of a reference material to a stated reference is pivotal to the use of the material. Metrological traceability is related to a combination of four attributes that are assigned to a clearly identified sample: description of the property, description of the quantity/kind of quantity, a number with its corresponding uncertainty and the measurement unit. The first two items define the identity of the measurand, whereas the latter two describe the value that is assigned to this measurand. Therefore, the concept of traceability rests on two anchor points, namely identity and quantity value. The identity of a measurand can be defined by its structure alone or by an operational/procedural definition, the quantity value of the measurand can refer to the SI, or to an artefact, if standards of arbitrary values have been used for the calibration of equipment (e.g. WHO standards; international units). The presented approach splits traceability statements for CRMs into a description of the identity of the measurand and the quantity value and provides a solution to overcome the conflict as to whether a measurement result should be declared as traceable to the SI or traceable to a method.

Keywords

Metrological traceability Certified reference materials Quantity value Identity Traceability statement Measurand 

References

  1. 1.
    ISO/IEC Guide 99 (2007) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO Guide 35 (2006) Reference materials—general and statistical principles for certification. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eurachem, CITAC (2003) Traceability in chemical measurementGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox M (2007) Metrologia 44:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolff JC, Taylor PDP, De Bievre P (1996) Anal Chem 68:3231–3237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO 17511 (2003) In vitro diagnostic medical devices—measurement of quantities in biological samples—metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    King B (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guideline Q3A (2006) ICH, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    May W, Parris R, Beck C, Fassett J, Greenberg R, Guenther F, Kramer G, Wise S, Gills T, Colbert J, Gettings R, MacDonald B (2000) NIST special publication 260-136. National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission, DG Research (MT Program) (1994) Guidelines for the production and certification of BCR reference materials, 1st edn. Document BCR/48/93Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pauwels J, Squirrell A (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:2–67Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO Guide 34 (2009) General requirements for the competence of reference material producers. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ILAC Guide 12 (2000) Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of reference materials producers. ILAC: www.ilac.org
  15. 15.
    Traceability policy of ERM. http://www.erm-crm.org
  16. 16.
    ISO Guide 31 (2000) Reference materials—contents of certificates and labels. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    AOAC Official Methods of Analysis (1990) Total dietary fibre in foods. In: Enzymatic—gravimetric method, 15th edn. 985.29, pp 1105–1106Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Englyst HN, Quigley ME, Hudson GJ (1994) Analyst 119:1497–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tyheander O, Åman P, Westerlund E, Andersson R, Pettersson D (1995) J AOAC Int 78:1030–1044Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee SC, Prosky L, De Vries JW (1992) J AOAC Int 75:395–416Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    AACC Report (2001) Cereal Foods World 46:112–126Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    ISO 11446 (1995) Soil quality—extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Panteghini M (2007) Clin Biochem Rev 28:97–104Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horsti J, Uppa H, Vilpo JA (2005) Clin Chem 51:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology (1985) ICSH/ICTH recommendations for reporting prothrombin time in oral anticoagulant control. Thromb Haemost 53:155–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM)Joint Research Centre, European CommissionGeelBelgium

Personalised recommendations