Advertisement

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 359–366 | Cite as

Standardisation of a European measurement method for the determination of mercury in deposition: results of the field trial campaign and determination of a measurement uncertainty and working range

  • Richard James Christopher Brown
  • N. Pirrone
  • C. van Hoek
  • M. Horvat
  • J. Kotnik
  • I. Wangberg
  • W. T. Corns
  • E. Bieber
  • F. Sprovieri
Practitioner's Report

Abstract

A standard method for the measurement of mercury in deposition is currently being finalised by Working Group 25 of the European Committee for Standardisation’s Technical Committee 264 ‘Air Quality’, in response to the requirements of the European Union’s Fourth Air Quality Daughter Directive. This paper reports the results of a field measurement programme which was undertaken to assess the uncertainty of the proposed standard method, define its working range and determine its compliance with the required data quality objectives of the Fourth Air Quality Daughter Directive.

Keywords

Deposition Mercury Air quality Field trial Standardisation Uncertainty 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The funding of CEN/TC 264/WG 25s field trial by the European Commission’s Environment Directorate-General (under Grant Agreement SA/CEN/ENV/000/2005-37), and the contribution and discussions of the members of CEN TC264 WG25, is gratefully acknowledged. The technical assistance of Vesna Fajon is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

769_2010_636_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 14 kb)
769_2010_636_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (15 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 14 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Off J Eur Union L152:1–44Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission (2004) Directive 2004/107/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 relating to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. Off J Eur Union L23:3–16Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNECE (2004) EMEP Monitoring strategy and measurement programme 2004–2009. http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/emep/Monitoring%20Strategy_full.pdf. Accessed November 2009
  4. 4.
    European Commission (2002) Ambient air pollution by mercury (Hg): position paper. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Committee for Standardisation (2009) http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/homepage.htm. Accessed November 2009
  6. 6.
    European Committee for Standardisation (2009) FprEN 15853:2009 ambient air quality—standard method for the determination of mercury deposition. CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Committee for Standardisation (2009) FprEN 15852:2009 ambient air quality—standard method for the determination of total gaseous mercury. CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown RJC, Pirrone N, van Hoek C, Sprovieri F, Fernandez R, Tote K (2009) Standardisation of a European measurement method for the determination of total gaseous mercury: results of the field trials campaign and determination of a measurement uncertainty and working range. J Environ Monit. doi: 10.1039/B924955A
  9. 9.
    Berger K, Bunzel F, Neuroth R (2003) Standardisation of a European reference measurement method for the determination of Pb, As, Cd and Ni in ambient air—validation and determination of the measurement uncertainty. Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung Der Luft 63:157–162Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sneek EJ (2003) Type approval of instruments and uncertainty calculations in the new EN standards for the measurement of SO2, NO2, CO and O3 in ambient air. Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung Der Luft 63:163–166Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rong X, Waite D, Huang GH, Tong L, Kybett B (2001) Materials selection for a dry atmospheric mercury deposits sampler. Chemosphere 45:1045–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aaas W, Alleman LY, Bieber E, Gladtke D, Houdret J-L, Karlsson V, Monies C (2009) Comparison of methods for measuring atmospheric deposition of arsenic, cadmium, nickel and lead. J Environ Monit 11:1276–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    VDI-DIN (1996) VDI 2119 Part 2: measurement of dust precipitation with collecting pots made of glass (Bergerhoff Method) or plastic. VDI-DIN, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    European Committee for Standardisation (2006) EN ISO 17852:2006 air quality—determination of mercury—method using atomic fluorescence spectrometry. CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    EMEP Manual for Sampling and Analysis (2009) http://tarantula.nilu.no/projects/ccc/manual/index.html. Accessed October 2009
  16. 16.
    Brown RJC, Brown AS (2008) Accurate calibration of mercury vapour measurements. Analyst 133:1611–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hall DJ, Upton SL, Marsland GW (1994) Designs for a deposition gauge and flux gauge for monitoring ambient dust. Atmos Environ 28:2963–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard James Christopher Brown
    • 1
  • N. Pirrone
    • 2
  • C. van Hoek
    • 3
  • M. Horvat
    • 4
  • J. Kotnik
    • 4
  • I. Wangberg
    • 5
  • W. T. Corns
    • 6
  • E. Bieber
    • 7
  • F. Sprovieri
    • 2
  1. 1.Analytical Science TeamNational Physical LaboratoryMiddlesexUK
  2. 2.CNR IIA, CNR-Institute of Atmospheric Pollution ResearchRomeItaly
  3. 3.NENDutch Standardization InstituteDelftThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Jozef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  5. 5.Swedish Environmental Research Institute, IVLGothenburgSweden
  6. 6.PS Analytical, Crayfields Industrial EstateKentUK
  7. 7.UmweltbundesamtGerman Federal Environment AgencyLangenGermany

Personalised recommendations