Abstract
A new terminology for the approaches to the quantification of the measurement uncertainty is presented, with a view to a better understanding of the available methodologies for the estimation of the measurement quality and differences among them. The knowledge of the merits, disadvantages and differences in the estimation process, of the available approaches, is essential for the production of metrologically correct and fit-to-purpose uncertainty estimations. The presented terminology is based on the level of the analytical information used to estimate the measurement uncertainty (e.g., supralaboratory or intralaboratory information), instead of the direction of information flow (“bottom-up” or “top-down”) towards the level of information where the test is performed, avoiding the use of the same designation for significantly different approaches. The proposed terminology is applied to the approaches considered on 19 examples of the quantification of the measurement uncertainty presented at the Eurachem/CITAC CG4 Guide, Eurolab Technical Report 1/2002 and Nordtest Technical Report 537. Additionally, differences of magnitude in the measurement uncertainty estimated by various approaches are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISO (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO/IEC 10725, Geneva, Switzerland
Eurachem, CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. Available via www.eurachem.ul.pt
Eurolab (2002) Measurement Uncertainty in testing—A short introduction on how to characterise accuracy and reliability of results including a list of useful references. Technical Report No. 1/2002, Germany
Nordtest (2004) Handbook for the calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, 2nd edn. Available via www.nordtest.org
ISO (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, Geneva, Switzerland
Analytical Methods Committee (1999) Analyst 120:2303
ISO (2004) Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation, ISO/TS 21748:2004, Geneva, Switzerland
Ellison SLR, Barwick VJ (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:101
Ellison SLR, Barwick VJ (1998) Analyst 123:1387
Maroto A, Riu J, Boqué R, Rius FV (1999) Anal Chim Acta 391:173
Jülicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S (1999) Analyst 124:537
Silva RJNB, Lino MJ, Santos JR, Camões MFGFC (2000) Analyst 125:1459
Silva RJNB, Figueiredo H, Santos JR, Camões MFGFC (2003) Anal Chim Acta 477:169
IUPAC, ISO, AOAC International, Eurachem (2000) Harmonised guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement. Available via www.eurachem.ul.pt
ISO (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement method and results—Part 3—Intermediate measures of the precision of a standard measurement method, ISO 5725-3:1994, Geneva, Switzerland
ASTM (1989) Standard guide for conducting ruggedness tests, ASTM E 1169-89
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia for financial support to project METROPEST—Metrological quality in the analysis of pesticide residues in foodstuffs (POCT1/AGR/47587/2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, R.J.N.B., Santos, J.R. & Camões, M.F.G.F.C. A new terminology for the approaches to the quantification of the measurement uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 10, 664–671 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0071-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0071-y