Advertisement

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 9, Issue 1–2, pp 106–111 | Cite as

Target measurement uncertainties for results of chemical measurements in Slovenia

Part I. Legislation related to quality of food
  • Nineta MajcenEmail author
  • Ivan Skubic
  • Paul De Bièvre
Policies and Concepts

Abstract

Target measurement uncertainties (TMUs), which should be achieved in chemical measurements, are proposed. Such TMUs are intended to set goals for measurement laboratories and could provide independent and objective criteria for laboratory assessors verifying the measurement capability of laboratories. A TMU is specified relative to a stated metrological reference for the measurand concerned. TMUs are common and objective, but are external criteria for both the measurement laboratories and their assessors. They are decided on the basis of the intended use of the measurement result, not evaluated as is the case for measurement uncertainty. The concept of TMU is illustrated by means of desirable applications in food measurements in Slovenia.

Keywords

Measurement uncertainty Measurements in chemistry Quality of food Technical legislation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The detailed analysis of Slovenian legislation related to measurements of food products, performed by Ms Špela Župerl, is highly appreciated. The authors are thankful also to Vida Žnidaršič-Pongrac, M. Sc., Mojca Božiček and Alenka Vojvodič for sharing their experience and expert knowledge related to some of the issues discussed in this paper.

Critical reading by B Hibbert (University of New South Wales, Australia) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    De Bièvre P, De Regge P (1979) 1979 Target values for uncertainty components of destructive analysis methods. Minutes of the meeting of the ESARDA-WGDA, Brussel, 23–24 April 1979. SCK/CEN MOL, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Bièvre P et al (1983) 1983 Target values for uncertainty components in fissile element and isotope assay. ESARDA Bulletin 6, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Bièvre P et al (1987) 1987 Target values for uncertainty components in fissile isotope and element assay. Proc IAEA Symp Nucl Safeguards Technol, Wien 1986, pp 649–662Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Bièvre P et al (1987) Random uncertainties in sampling and element assay of nuclear materials; target values 1988. ESARDA Bulletin 13, pp 8–16Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deron S et al (1994) 1993 International target values for uncertainty components in measurements of nuclear materials for safeguards purposes. ESARDA Bulletin 23, Joint Research Centre ISPRA, pp 15–27Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuhn E et al (1994) 1993 International target values for uncertainty components in fissile isotope and element assay for the effective safeguarding of nuclear materials. IAEA STR-294, WienGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Idem (1997) J Nucl Mater Man (USA) 15:99–105Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Idem (1993) Science and Technology Agency Japan (Japanese translation)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aigner H et al(2001) International target values 2000 for measurement uncertainties in safeguarding nuclear materials. ESARDA Bulletin 31, pp 39–68Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Bièvre P (1998) Analysts need target values for uncertainties. Accred Qual Assur 3:139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Bièvre P (1998) Analysts need target values for uncertainties. Accred Qual Assur 3:179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Bièvre P (1999) More on target values for uncertainties. Accred Qual Assur 4:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Nevel L, Taylor PDP, Ornemark U, Moody JR, Heumann KG, de Bièvre P (1998) International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) IMEP-6: Elements in water. Accred Qual Assur 3:56-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Nevel L, Poulsen E, Papadakis I, Taylor PDP (1998) The international measurement evaluation programme: IMEP-10, trace elements in poyethylene. Report to the participants Dec 1998, IRMM, BE-2440 GEELGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 330/32, vol 41, 5 Dec 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metrology Institute of the Republic of Slovenia (MIRS)Laboratory Centre CeljeCeljeSlovenia

Personalised recommendations