Skip to main content

Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: a systematic literature review and analysis

Abstract

eLearning systems have become a very important part of teaching, both as web-based systems for online education and as auxiliary tools for face-to-face study, where they provide an additional learning support for on-campus learners. To insure the sustainability of an eLearning system on both individual and social levels, we have to cover many aspects of sustainability requirements: human, technical, economic, and environmental. This paper provides a systematic literature review of the sustainability meta-requirements for eLearning systems to identify open problems and to present the state of the art of this research area. We analysed 124 papers, so we identified 18 high-level sustainability requirements for eLearning systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.

  2. 2.

    http://dl.acm.org.

  3. 3.

    http://scopus.com.

  4. 4.

    http://springerlink.com.

  5. 5.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

  6. 6.

    http://www.scimagojr.com/.

References

  1. 1.

    Allen DB, Gould RA, Littrell LA, Schillie JE (2010) K-state’s distributed learning commons: achieving long-term sustainability through strategic partnerships. Coll. Undergrad. Libr. 17(2):160–176

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Alrashidi A (2013) An exploration of e-learning benefits for Saudi Arabia: Toward policy reform. PhD thesis, University of La Verne

  3. 3.

    Amador F, Oliveira CP (2013) Integrating sustainability into the university: past, present, and future. In: Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions: mapping trends and good practices around the world, Springer, pp 65–78

  4. 4.

    Anderson T, Dron J (2012) Learning technology through three generations of technology enhanced distance education pedagogy. Eur J Open Distance e-learn 15(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Assembly UG (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Technical report, A/RES/70/1, 21 October

  6. 6.

    Attwell G (2007) Personal learning environments-the future of e-learning? eLearning Pap 2(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bell M, Bell W (2005) It’s installed... now get on with it! looking beyond the software to the cultural change. Br J Educ Technol 36(4):643–656

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bensch S, Rager M (2012) Cloud-based online learning platforms. In: Business information systems workshops, vol 127 LNBIP, pp 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Berge ZL, Giles L (2006) Implementing and sustaining e-learning in the workplace. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ (IJICTE) 2(4):64–75

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berge ZL, Giles L (2008) Strategic planning for e-learning in the workplace. In: Adapting information and communication technologies for effective education. IGI Global, pp 257–270

  11. 11.

    Berkhout F, Hertin J (2001) Impacts of information and communication technologies on environmental sustainability: speculations and evidence. Report to the OECD, Brighton, p 21

  12. 12.

    Betz S, Caporale T (2014) Sustainable software system engineering. In: The fourth international conference on big data and cloud computing (BdCloud). IEEE, pp 612–619

  13. 13.

    Bhat JS (2011) Technological ambidexterity in the management of national infrastructure programmes. J Asian Public Policy 4(3):350–356

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bottino RM (2007) On-line learning networks: framework and scenarios. Educ Inf Technol 12(2):93–105

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bourn D, Shiel C (2009) Global perspectives: aligning agendas? Environ Educ Res 15(6):661–677

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80(4):571–583

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Breslow L, Pritchard DE, DeBoer J, Stump GS, Ho AD, Seaton DT (2013) Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edx’s first mooc. Res Pract Asses 8:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Buchan J (2010) Putting ourselves in the big picture: a sustainable approach to project management for e-learning. Int J E-Learn Distance Educ 24(1):55–76

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Burton SL, Harris HR, Burrell DN, Brown-Jackson KL, Bessette D, McClintock R, Lu S, White YW (2014) Educational edifices need a mobile strategy to fully engage in learning activities. In: Implications of social media use in personal and professional settings, pp 284–309

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Calero C, Piattini M (2015) Green in software engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Calero C, Piattini M (2017) Puzzling out software sustainability. Sustain Comput Inf Syst 16:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Calero C, Bertoa MF, Moraga MÁ (2013) Sustainability and quality: icing on the cake. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems, CEUR-WS.org

  23. 23.

    Cápay M, Mesárošová M, Balogh Z (2011) Analysis of students’ behaviour in e-learning system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd EAEEIE annual conference (EAEEIE), 2011. IEEE, pp 1–6

  24. 24.

    Casquero O, Portillo J, Ovelar R, Benito M, Romo J (2010) iPLE network: an integrated eLearning 2.0 architecture from a university’s perspective. Interact Learn Environ 18(3):293–308

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Castro-Schez JJ, Redondo MA, Gallardo J, Jurado F et al (2012) Designing and developing software for educative virtual laboratories with language processing techniques: lessons learned in practical experiments. J Res Pract Inf Technol 44(3):289–308

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chang V, Guetl C (2007) E-learning ecosystem (eles)-a holistic approach for the development of more effective learning environment for small-and-medium sized enterprises (SMES). In: Digital EcoSystems and technologies conference, 2007. DEST’07. Inaugural IEEE-IES. IEEE, pp 420–425

  27. 27.

    Chen CM, Lee HM, Chen YH (2005) Personalized e-learning system using item response theory. Comput Educ 44(3):237–255

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen IY (2007) The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communitiesa longitudinal study. J Inf Sci 33(4):451–467

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cheung CM, Lee MK (2009) Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: model development and empirical test. J Inf Sci 35(3):279–298

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chiu CM, Hsu MH, Wang ET (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis Supp Syst 42(3):1872–1888

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Colasante M (2010) Future-focused learning via online anchored discussion, connecting learners with digital artefacts, other learners, and teachers. In: Ascilite 2010. Ascilite, pp 211–221

  32. 32.

    Colomo-Palacios R, Messnarz R, Siakas K, Palosi D, Coakley D (2014) Using social media as a tool for business improvement and certification of knowledge workers. J Softw Evol Process 26(9):791–798

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dagger D, Conlan O, Wade V (2005) Fundamental requirements of personalised elearning development environments. In: Richards G (ed) E-Learn: world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2005, association for the advancement of computing in education (AACE), pp 2746–2754

  34. 34.

    Dagger D, O’Connor A, Lawless S, Walsh E, Wade V (2007) Service-oriented e-learning platforms: from monolithic systems to flexible services. Internet Comput 11(3):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Demirkan H, Goul M, Gros M (2010) A reference model for sustainable e-learning service systems: experiences with the joint university/teradata consortium. Decis Sci J Innov Educ 8(1):151–189

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Demski J (2012) Rebuilding the lms for the 21st century. Campus Technol 25(8):34

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dholakia U, King J, Baraniuk R (2006) What makes an open education program sustainable? the case of connexions. In: Open education conference, vol 2340

  38. 38.

    Dinevski D (2008) Open educational resources and lifelong learning. In: 30th international conference on information technology interfaces ITI 2008, 2008. IEEE, pp 117–122

  39. 39.

    Dong B, Zheng Q, Yang J, Li H, Qiao M (2009) An e-learning ecosystem based on cloud computing infrastructure. In: International conference on advanced learning technologies. IEEE, pp 125–127

  40. 40.

    Downes S (2007) Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdiscip J E-Learn Learn Objects 3(1):29–44

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dyson LE, Litchfield A, Lawrence E, Raban R, Leijdekkers P (2009) Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: four case studies. Aust J Educ Technol 25(2):250–267

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ellis RA (2016) Students approaches to groupwork in a blended course, associations with perceptions of the online environment and academic achievement-when is learning engaged? Educ Inf Technol 21(5):1095–1112

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Farooq U, Schank P, Harris A, Fusco J, Schlager M (2007) Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: a case study of designing tapped in. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 16(4–5):397–429

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fisler J, Bleisch S (2006) elml, the elesson markup language: developing ustainable e-learning content using an open source xml framework. In: In WEBIST 2006-international conference on web information systems and technologies, 11th–13th April 2006 (Setubal, Citeseer)

  45. 45.

    Fisler J, Schneider F (2009) Creating, handling and implementing e-learning courses using the open source tools olat and elml at the university of zurich. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, vol 1

  46. 46.

    Franceschi KG, Lee RM, Hinds D (2008) Engaging e-learning in virtual worlds: supporting group collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, pp 7–7

  47. 47.

    Friesen N (2009) Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 10(5):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Garg K, Varma V (2015) Systemic requirements of a software engineering learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th India software engineering conference, ISEC ’15. ACM, pp 147–155

  49. 49.

    Garrison DR, Akyol Z (2009) Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education. J Comput Higher Educ 21(1):19

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Georgiadou E, Siakas KV (2006) Distance learning: technologies; enabling learning at own place, own pace, own time. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on software process improvement-research into education and training,(INSPIRE 2006) learning and teaching issues in software quality, April, Southampton, UK, pp 29–40

  51. 51.

    Ghirardini B (2011) E-learning methodologies A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  52. 52.

    Goodland R (2002) The concept of environmental sustainability. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gunn C (2010) Sustainability factors for e-learning initiatives. ALT-J 18(2):89–103

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gunn C (2011) Sustaining e-learning innovations, changing demands, changing directions. Proc Ascilite Hobart 2011:509–519

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Gunn C, Woodgate S, OGrady W (2005) Repurposing learning objects: a sustainable alternative? ALT-J 13(3):189–200

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gustavsson I, Nilsson K, Zackrisson J, Garcia-Zubia J, Hernandez-Jayo U, Nafalski A, Nedic Z, Gol O, Machotka J, Pettersson M, Lago T, Hkansson L (2009) On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 2(4):263–274

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Halimi S (2005) Lifelong learning for equity and social cohesion: a new challenge for higher education. Lifelong Learn Distance Higher Educ Commonw Learn /UNESCO 2005:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Halkias D, Mills GT (2008) Distance education in support of lifelong learning: the case of the hellas alive web platform in building greek language learning communities. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computers. ACM, pp 57–60

  59. 59.

    Hine N, Petersen F, Pluke M, Sund T (2008) Standardization work on personalized ehealth systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 1518–1520

  60. 60.

    Hoffman JJ, Hoelscher ML, Sherif K (2005) Social capital, knowledge management, and sustained superior performance. J Knowl Manag 9(3):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hylén J (2006) Open educational resources: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of open education

  62. 62.

    Iatagan M (2012) Strategies for ongoing professional training of human resources in a globalized economy. Human Capital and Resources: Developments, Management and Strategies

  63. 63.

    ISO/IEC 25010 (2011) Systems and software engineering software product quality requirements and evaluation (square) software product quality and system quality in use models

  64. 64.

    James P (2014) Urban sustainability in theory and practice: circles of sustainability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Jiang H, Ganoe C, Carroll JM (2010) Four requirements for digital case study libraries. Educ Inf Technol 15(3):219–236

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Jin G, Law R (2009) Lifelong learning to advance the engineer’s career. Ann Conf Can Soc Civil Eng 1:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kazancoglu Y, Aksoy M (2011) A fuzzy logic-based qfd to identify key factors of e-learning design. Proc Soc Beha Sci 28:322–327

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Keele S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Durham

  69. 69.

    Keengwe J, Malapile S (2014) Factors influencing technology planning in developing countries: a literature review. Educ Inf Technol 19(4):703–712

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kendall M (2005) Lifelong learning really matters for elementary education in the 21st century. Educ Inf Technol 10(3):289–296

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kim P, Miranda T, Olaciregui C (2008) Pocket school: exploring mobile technology as a sustainable literacy education option for underserved indigenous children in latin america. Int J Educ Dev 28(4):435–445

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kitchenham B, Dyba T, Jorgensen M (2004) Evidence-based software engineering. In: 26th International conference on software engineering. ACM, pp 273–281

  73. 73.

    Ko HM (2012) Soft power: a critical factor for the effectiveness and development of a school. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 7513 LNCS:414–420

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Koçak SA, Alptekin GI, Bener AB (2015) Integrating environmental sustainability in software product quality. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems (RE4SuSy), CEUR-WS.org, pp 17–24

  75. 75.

    Konting MM (2012) Leadership development for sustainability of e-learning. Proc Soc Beh Sci 67:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Koohang A, Harman K (2007) Advancing sustainability of open educational resources. Issues Inf Sci Inf Technol 4:535–544

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Koshkin AP, Rassolov IM, Novikov AV (2016) Monitoring social media: students satisfaction with university administration activities. Educ Inf Technol 22:2499–2522

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kruchten P (2015) Lifelong learning for lifelong employment. IEEE Softw 32(4):85–87

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kumar S, Buyya R (2012) Green cloud computing and environmental sustainability. Harnessing green it: principles and practices, pp 315–339

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lago P, Jansen T (2011) Creating environmental awareness in service oriented software engineering. In: Service-oriented computing. Springer, pp 181–186

  81. 81.

    Lago P, Koçak SA, Crnkovic I, Penzenstadler B (2015) Framing sustainability as a property of software quality. Commun ACM 58(10):70–78

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    van Lamsweerde A (2008) Requirements engineering: From craft to discipline. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on foundations of software engineering. ACM, pp 238–249

  83. 83.

    Laurillard D (2007) Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Educ 54(1):21–39

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Lee MJ, Chan A (2007) Pervasive, lifestyle-integrated mobile learning for distance learners: an analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study. Open Learn 22(3):201–218

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Littlejohn A (2003a) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning. Psychology Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Littlejohn A (2003b) Supporting sustainable e-learning. Assoc Learn Technol J 11(3):88–102

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Liu CC, Chung CW, Tao SY (2009) Making classrooms socio-technical environments for supporting collaborative learning: the role of personal devices and boundary objects. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning, international society of the learning sciences, CSCL’09, pp 320–324

  88. 88.

    Lizhong T, Aichen Z, Yongjie S (2011) The function of the university libraries in constructing lifelong education system. Adv Intell Soft Comput 109:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Mahmood T, Hafeez K (2013) Performance assessment of an e-learning software system for sustainability. Int J Qual Serv Sci 5(2):208–229

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Mahmoud SS, Ahmad I (2013) A green model for sustainable software engineering. Int J Softw Eng Appl 7(4):1738–9984

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Manca S, Ranieri M (2017) Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Educ Inf Technol 22(2):605–622

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Manuja M, et al (2011) Industry academia collaboration model: the design challenges. In: 2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on software engineering education and training (CSEE&T). IEEE, pp 111–120

  93. 93.

    Mason M (2008) What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educ Philos Theory 40(1):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Memmel M (2011) Interoperability requirements for a sustainable component to support management and sharing of digital resources. In: 1st Workshop on exploring fitness and evolvability of personal learning environments, CEUR-WS.org, pp 25–29

  95. 95.

    Meneses G (2011) Design of an electronic instrumentation virtual laboratory based on free-open resources. In: 2011 6th Colombian computing congress (CCC). IEEE, pp 1–6

  96. 96.

    Miliszewska I, Sztendur E (2011) Critical success attributes of transnational it education programmes: the client perspective. J Inf Technol Educ Res 10(1):123–137

    Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Mocigemba D (2006) Sustainable computing. Poiesis Praxis 4(3):163–184

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Mohan L, Raman P, Choppella V, Reddy YR (2017) A crowdsourcing approach for quality enhancement of elearning systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th innovations in software engineering conference, ISEC ’17, ACM, pp 188–194

  99. 99.

    Motiwalla LF (2007) Mobile learning: a framework and evaluation. Comput Educ 49(3):581–596

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Mridha GMN, Erlandsson B, Khan A, Islam M, Sultana N, Reza S, Srinivas M (2013) E-learning for empowering the rural people in bangladesh opportunities and challenges. In: International conference on e-learning and e-technologies in education (ICEEE). IEEE, pp 323–328

  101. 101.

    Müller J, Gil JMS, Hernández F, Giró X, Bosco A (2007) The socio-economic dimensions of ict-driven educational change. Comput Educ 49(4):1175–1188

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Müller M, Siebenhüner B (2007) Policy instruments for sustainability-oriented organizational learning. Bus Strategy Environ 16(3):232–245

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Naumann S, Dick M, Kern E, Johann T (2011) The GREENSOFT model: a reference model for green and sustainable software and its engineering. Sustain Comput Inform Syst 1(4):294–304

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Neila R, Rabai LBA (2014) Deploying suitable countermeasures to solve the security problems within an e-learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on security of information and networks, SIN ’14, ACM, pp 33–38

  105. 105.

    Nichols M (2008) Institutional perspectives: the challenges of e-learning diffusion. Br J Educ Technol 39(4):598–609

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Nunes EP, Luz AR, Lemos EM, Maciel C, dos Anjos AM, Borges LC, Nunes C (2016) Mobile serious game proposal for environmental awareness of children. In: The frontiers in education conference (FIE), IEEE, pp 1–8

  107. 107.

    Nwokediuko A (2012) Advancing e-learning in african native communities: the language factor. In: International conference on education and e-learning innovations (ICEELI). IEEE, pp 1–4

  108. 108.

    Olofsson AD, Lindberg JO (2006) ”Whatever happened to the social dimension?” aspects of learning in a distance-based teacher training programme. Educ Inf Technol 11(1):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    O’Neil AF (2008) The current status of instructional design theories in relation to today’s authoring systems. Br J Educ Technol 39(2):251–267

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Ossiannilsson E, Landgren L (2012) Quality in e-learning-a conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects. J Comput Assist Learn 28(1):42–51

    Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Pardo A, Fisteus JA, Kloos CD et al (2012) A distributed collaborative system for flexible learning content production and management. J Res Pract Inf Technol 44(2):203–221

    Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Park CB, Choi H, Kim P (2009) Adaptive open mobile learning device for the underserved. In: ICCE’09 international conference on consumer electronics, digest of technical papers, IEEE

  113. 113.

    Pellas N (2014) The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Comput Hum Behav 35:157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Pellas N (2016) Bolstering the quality and integrity of online collaborative university- level courses via an open sim standalone server in conjunction with sloodle. Educ Inf Technol 21(5):1007–1032

    Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Penzenstadler B (2014) Infusing green: Requirements engineering for green in and through software systems. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems, (RE4SuSy), CEUR-WS.org

  116. 116.

    Penzenstadler B, Femmer H (2013) A generic model for sustainability with process- and product-specific instances. In: Proceedings of the workshop on green in/by software engineering. ACM, pp 3–8

  117. 117.

    Pettersson O, Vogel B (2012) Reusability and interoperability in mobile learning: a study of current practices. In: The seventh international conference on wireless. Mobile and ubiquitous technology in education. IEEE, pp 306–310

  118. 118.

    Pullen JM, Snow C (2007) Integrating synchronous and asynchronous internet distributed education for maximum effectiveness. Educ Inf Technol 12(3):137–148

    Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Rahanu H, Georgiadou E, Siakas K, Ekert D, Messanarz R, Abeysinghe G (2015) Towards relating delivery methods and examination success: lessons learned from the valo llp project case study. J Softw Evol Process 27(8):555–564

    Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Rajasingham L (2011) Will mobile learning bring a paradigm shift in higher education? Educ Res Int 2011:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/5284951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Randelin M, Saaranen T, Naumanen P, Louhevaara V (2013) Towards sustainable well-being in smes through the web-based learning program of ergonomics. Educ Inf Technol 18(1):95–111

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Razavian M, Procaccianti G, Tamburri DA, et al (2014) Four-dimensional sustainable e-services. In: Proceedings of the 28th EnviroInfo, Shaker-Verlag AG

  123. 123.

    Richey RC (2008) Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. TechTrends 52(1):24–25

    Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Robertson I (2008) Sustainable e-learning, activity theory and professional development. In: Ascilite, ASCILITE (Melbourne, Australia), pp 819–826

  125. 125.

    Roher K, Richardson D (2013) Sustainability requirement patterns. In: The third international workshop on requirements patterns (RePa). IEEE, pp 8–11

  126. 126.

    Rovai AP, Downey JR (2010) Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. Internet Higher Educ 13(3):141–147

    Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Roy A (2012) eLearning: tool to ensure growth and sustainability of SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on e-learning. ECEL, p 480

  128. 128.

    Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K (2008) Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int J Sustain Higher Educ 9(2):116–130

    Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Ruyters M, Colasante M, Douglas K, Mandarano G (2012) Sustainability of a university designed and developed media annotation tool to prepare learners with skills needed for future employment. ASCILITE–annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education

  130. 130.

    Salmon G (2005) Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J 13(3):201–218

    Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Schoenwald I (2003) Sustainable implementation of e-learning as a change process at universities. Online Educ 1:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Scoppio G, Luyt I (2017) Mind the gap: enabling online faculty and instructional designers in mapping new models for quality online courses. Educ Inf Technol 22:725–746

    Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Secundo G, Passiante G, Romano A (2012) Industry-university learning network to create competences for intelligent and sustainable manufacturing: a case study. In: International conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET). IEEE, pp 1–8

  134. 134.

    Secundo G, Passiante G, Romano A, Moliterni P (2013) Developing the next generation of engineers for intelligent and sustainable manufacturing: a case study. Int J Eng Educ 29(1):248–262

    Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Sharpe R, Benfield G, Francis R (2006) Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools. Res Learn Technol 14(2):135–151

    Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Shehabat IM, Mahdi SA (2009) E-learning and its impact to the educational system in the arab world. In: International conference on information management and engineering. IEEE, pp 220–225

  137. 137.

    Shen L, LeClair J (2013) Use of sustainable and systematic plan to assess student learning outcomes for non-traditional it students. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition, American Society for Engineering Education

  138. 138.

    Sousa JL (2011) Information systems architecture modeling based on loosely coupled structures: an e-learning use case. In: 9th International conference on emerging elearning technologies and applications (ICETA). IEEE, pp 195–198

  139. 139.

    Sowe SK, Zettsu K, Murakami Y (2013) A model for creating and sustaining information services platform communities: lessons learnt from open source software. In: Proceedings of ITU kaleidoscope: building sustainable communities (K-2013). IEEE, pp 1–8

  140. 140.

    Sridharan B, Deng H, Corbitt B (2010) Critical success factors in elearning ecosystems: a qualitative study. J Syst Inf Technol 12(4):263–288

    Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Stechert P (2006) Informatics system comprehension: a learner-centred cognitive approach to networked thinking. Educ Inf Technol 11(3):305–318

    Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Stefanovic M (2013) The objectives, architectures and effects of distance learning laboratories for industrial engineering education. Comput Educ 69:250–262

    Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Stepanyan K, Littlejohn A, Margaryan A (2013) Sustainable e-learning: toward a coherent body of knowledge. J Educ Technol Soc 16(2):91–102

    Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Stewart B, Khare A (2012) Athabasca university reduces ict carbon footprint. GSTF J Comput 1(4):70–75

    Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Stewart B, Khare A (2015) elearning and the sustainable campus. In: Transformative approaches to sustainable development at universities. Springer, pp 291–305

  146. 146.

    Stiles M, Yorke J (2007) Technology supported learning tensions between innovation, and control and organisational and professional cultures. J Organ Transform Soc Change 3(3):251–267

    Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Suhonen J, Sutinen E (2014) The four pillar model-analysing the sustainability of online doctoral programmes. TechTrends 58(4):81–88

    Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen YY, Yeh D (2008) What drives a successful e-learning? an empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput Educ 50(4):1183–1202

    Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Thomas L, Trapp S (2007) Building re-configurable blendedlearning arrangements. In: Balkan conference in informatics (BCI 2007), pp 271–280

  150. 150.

    Tikhomirova N, Tikhomirov V, Maksimova V, Telnov Y (2012) Knowledge management in the smart university. Proc Eur Conf Knowl Manag 2:1172–1178

    Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Tomkinson B, Hutt I (2012) Online pbl: a route to sustainability education? Campus-Wide Inf Syst 29(4):291–303

    Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Toppin IN, Toppin SM (2016) Virtual schools: the changing landscape of k-12 education in the us. Educ Inf Technol 21(6):1571–1581

    Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Törngren M, Bensalem S, McDermid J, Passerone R, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A, Schätz B (2015) Education and training challenges in the era of cyber-physical systems: beyond traditional engineering. In: Proceedings of the WESE’15: workshop on embedded and cyber-physical systems education, WESE’15. ACM. pp 8:1–8:5

  154. 154.

    Trajkovik V, Caporali E, Palmisano E, Valdiserri J (2010) Establishing a videoconferencing infrastructure in the republic of macedonia as an engineering educational service. In: Joint International IGIP-SEFI annual conference, SEFI

  155. 155.

    Tuparov G, Kostadinova H, Tuparova D, Raykova M (2014) Approaches for competencies assessment in open source e-learning environments. In: Global engineering education conference (EDUCON). IEEE, pp 529–532

  156. 156.

    Uden L, Wangsa IT, Damiani E (2007) The future of e-learning: E-learning ecosystem. In: 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and technologies conference, pp 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2007.371955

  157. 157.

    Vogel B, Kurti A, Milrad M, Johansson E, Müller M (2014) Mobile inquiry learning in sweden: development insights on interoperability, extensibility and sustainability of the LETS GO software system. Educ Technol Soc 17(2):43–57

    Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Vovides Y, Chale SB, Gadhula R, Kebaetse MB, Nigussie NA, Suleman F, Tibyampansha D, Ibrahim GR, Ntabaye M, Frehywot S et al (2014) A systems approach to implementation of elearning in medical education: five mepi schools’ journeys. Acad Med 89(8):S102–S106

    Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Wang R, Scown P, Urquhart C, Hardman J (2014) Tapping the educational potential of facebook: guidelines for use in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 19(1):21–39

    Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Weichhart G (2015) Supporting the evolution and interoperability of organisational models with e-learning technologies. Ann Rev Control 39:118–127

    Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Winfree T, Goldacre P, Sherkat M, Graham P, Mendoza A, Miller T (2017) Learning for low carbon living: the potential of mobile learning applications for built environment trades and professionals in Australia. Proc Eng 180:1773–1783

    Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering, EASE ’14. ACM, pp 38:1–38:10

  163. 163.

    Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Yigit T, Isik AH, Ince M (2014) Web-based learning object selection software using analytical hierarchy process. Softw IET 8(4):174–183

    Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Zheng Q, He H, Ma T, Xue N, Li B, Dong B (2014) Big log analysis for e-learning ecosystem. In: The 11th international conference on e-business engineering. IEEE, pp 258–263

  166. 166.

    Zon G, Corrigan S, McDonald N, Maij A (2012) A learning, training & mentoring framework (ltm) & the role of serious games to facilitate sustainable change in the aviation industry. In: 11th International probabilistic safety assessment and management conference and the annual european safety and reliability conference, vol 6, pp 5044–5051

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ahmed D. Alharthi is supported by a scholarship from Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed D. Alharthi.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 List of studies for sustainable eLearning systems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alharthi, A.D., Spichkova, M. & Hamilton, M. Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: a systematic literature review and analysis. Requirements Eng 24, 523–543 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-0299-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sustainability requirements
  • Requirements engineering
  • eLearning
  • Sustainable eLearning systems
  • Sustainability
  • Systematic literature review