Skip to main content

Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    Archer LB (1984) Systematic method for designers. In: Cross N (eds) Developments in design methodology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Asimov M (1962) Introduction to design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Auyang S (2004) Engineering: an endless frontier. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brooks F (1996) The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Commun ACM 39(3):61–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bush D (2005) Modelling support for early identification of safety requirements: a preliminary investigation. In: Proceedings RHAS’2005 workshop, 13th international IEEE conference on requirements engineering, Paris, August 2005

  6. 6.

    Cross N (1994) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cross N (2001) Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In: Eastman C, McCracken M, Newstetter W (eds) Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 79–103

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Davis AM, Hickey AM (2004) A new paradigm for planning and evaluating requirements engineering research. In: Second international workshop on comparative evaluation in requirements engineering, Kyoto, Japan, pp 7–16

  9. 9.

    Easterbrook S, Yu E, Aranda J, Fan Y, Horkoff J, Leica M, Qadir RA (2005) Do viewpoints lead to better conceptual models? An exploratory case study. In: Proceedings of 13th IEEE international conference on requirements engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 199–208

  10. 10.

    El Emam K, Madhavji NH (1995) A field study of requirements engineering practices in information systems development. In: Proceedings of 2nd IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 68–80

  11. 11.

    Feynman RP (1994) Six easy pieces. Perseus Books

  12. 12.

    Glass R, Ramesh V, Vessey I (2004) An analysis of research in the computing disciplines. Commun ACM 47(6):89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hall AD (1962) A methodology for systems engineering. Van Nostrand, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hicks MJ (1991) Problem solving in business and management. Hard, soft and creative approaches. International Thomson Business Press

  15. 15.

    IEEE (2004) Genre submission guide. Cited 22 May 2005

  16. 16.

    Jones JC (1984) A method for systematic design. In: Cross N (ed), Developments in design methodology. Wiley, pp 9–31

  17. 17.

    Maiden NAM, Jones SV, Manning S, Greenwood J, Renou L (2004) Model-driven requirements engineering: synchronising models in an air traffic management case study. In: Proceedings CaiSE’2004, Springer-Verlag LNCS 3084, pp 368–383

  18. 18.

    March JG (1994) A primer on decision making. How decisions happen. The Free Press

  19. 19.


  20. 20.

    Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product design: fundamentals and methods. Wiley

  21. 21.

    Tichy W, Lukowicz P, Prechelt L, Heinz E (1997) Experimental evaluation in computer science: a quantitative study. J Syst Softw 28:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vincenti WG (1990) What engineers know and how they know it. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wieringa RJ (1996) Requirements engineering: frameworks for understanding. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wieringa RJ, Heerkens H (2004) Evaluating the structure of research papers: a case study. In: Gervasi V, Zowghi D, Sim SE (eds) Second international workshop in comparative evaluation of requirements engineering, pp 29–38

  25. 25.

    Witte E (1972) Field research on complex decision-making processes—the phase theorem. Int Stud Manage Organ 2:156–182

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.


  27. 27.

    Yu E, Mylopoulos JM (1994) Understanding “why” in software process modelling, analysis and design. In: Proceedings of 16th international conference on software engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 159–168

  28. 28.

    Zave P (1997) Classification of research efforts in requirements engineering. ACM Comput Surv 29(4):315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zelkowitz M, Wallace D (1997) Experimental validation in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol 39:735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This paper benefited from discussions with Al Davis, Sol Greenspan, Hans Heerkens, Ann Hickey, and Pamela Zave and from comments by the anonymous reviewers.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roel Wieringa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N. et al. Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requirements Eng 11, 102–107 (2006).

Download citation


  • Requirements engineering research
  • Research methods
  • Paper classification
  • Paper evaluation criteria