Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organ- und Fertilitätserhalt beim Zervixkarzinom

Organ and fertility preservation in cervical cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Onkologie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Der Erhalt der Fertilität ist für einen erheblichen Anteil der Patientinnen mit einer Zervixkarzinom von Bedeutung. Wird die Erkrankung in einem sehr frühen Stadium diagnostiziert und ist eine Radiochemotherapie verzichtbar, so kann ein fertilitätserhaltendes Konzept zur Behandlung zur Anwendung kommen, ohne die onkologische Sicherheit zu gefährden. Im vorliegenden Artikel werden die Möglichkeiten des Fertilitäts- und Organerhalts bei Zervixkarzinom in Abhängigkeit vom jeweiligen Stadium dargestellt.

Abstract

Preservation of fertility is important for a significant proportion of patients with cervical cancer. If the disease is diagnosed at an early stage and chemoradiotherapy is not necessary, a fertility-preserving treatment concept can be used without jeopardizing oncological safety. In the following article, the possibilities of fertility and organ preservation in cervical cancer patients depending on the stage of disease are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. RKI, Krebs in Deutschland für 2017/2018, RKI 2021

  2. American Cancer Society (ACS). Key Statistics for Cervical Cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/key-statistics.html#:~:text=Cervical%20cancer%20is%20most%20frequently,still%20present%20as%20they%20age (Stand 03/2023)

  3. Shah JS, Jooya ND, Woodard TL et al (2019) Reproductive counseling and pregnancy outcomes after radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 30:e45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud MC, Roy M (2011) The vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies. Gynecol Oncol 121:290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hauspy J, Beiner M, Harley I et al (2007) Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105:285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Machida H, Iwata T, Okugawa K et al (2020) Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a proposal of an ideal candidate. Gynecol Oncol 156:341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Maulard A et al (2016) Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 17:e240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spoozak L, Lewin SN, Burke WM et al (2012) Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:80.e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Plante M, Renaud MC, Sebastianelli A, Gregoire J (2020) Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care? Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Q, Li W, Kanis MJ et al (2017) Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes with fertility-sparing treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8:46580

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud MC et al (2013) Simple vaginal trachelectomy in early-stage low-risk cervical cancer: a pilot study of 16 cases and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23:916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramirez PT, Pareja R, Rendón GJ et al (2014) Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care? Gynecol Oncol 132:254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tseng JH, Aloisi A, Sonoda Y et al (2018) Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: a population-based study of long-term survival. Gynecol Oncol 150:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vranes B, Milenkovic S, Radojevic M et al (2016) Risk of parametrial spread in small stage I cervical carcinoma: pathology review of 223 cases with a tumor diameter of 20 mm or less. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reade CJ, Eiriksson LR, Covens A (2013) Surgery for early stage cervical cancer: how radical should it be? Gynecol Oncol 131:222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sia TY, Chen L, Melamed A et al (2019) Trends in use and effect on survival of simple hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 134:1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noël P, Dubé M, Plante M, St-Laurent G (2014) Early cervical carcinoma and fertility-sparing treatment options: MR imaging as a tool in patient selection and a follow-up modality. Radiographics 34:1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lakhman Y, Akin O, Park KJ et al (2013) Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Radiology 269:149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kasuga Y, Nishio H, Miyakoshi K et al (2016) Pregnancy outcomes after abdominal radical Trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a 13-year experience in a single tertiary-care center. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Q et al (2017) Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes with fertility-sparing treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8(28):46580–46592

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Plante M et al (2004) Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 94(3):614–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hauerberg L, Høgdall C, Loft A et al (2015) Vaginal radical Trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Results of the Danish national single center strategy. Gynecol Oncol 138:304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH et al (2011) Outcomes after radical hysterectomy according to tumor size divided by 2‑cm interval in patients with early cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 22:59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park JY, Joo WD, Chang SJ et al (2014) Long-term outcomes after fertility-sparing laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in young women with early-stage cervical cancer: an Asan Gynecologic Cancer Group (AGCG) study. J Surg Oncol 110:252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wethington SL, Cibula D, Duska LR et al (2012) An international series on abdominal radical trachelectomy: 101 patients and 28 pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Plante M (2013) Evolution in fertility-preserving options for early-stage cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy, simple trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23:982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Plante M, Renaud MC, Hoskins IA, Roy M (2005) Vaginal radical trachelectomy: a valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. A series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 98:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plante M, Roy M (2006) Fertility-preserving options for cervical cancer. Oncology 20:479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shepherd JH, Mould T, Oram DH (2001) Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility rates. BJOG 108:882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bouchard-Fortier G, Reade CJ, Covens A (2014) Non-radical surgery for small early-stage cervical cancer. Is it time? Gynecol Oncol 132:624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-033OLk_S3_Diagnostik_Therapie_Nachsorge_Zervixkarzinom_2021-05.pdf Stand 12/2022

  32. Fehm TN, Wimberger P, Solomayer EF, Stübs FA, Beckmann MW (2022) Management von Zervixdysplasien und Zervixkarzinom in der Schwangerschaft. TumorDiagnostik und Therapie 43(03): 167–179, https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1738-6512

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Asklepios Frauenklinik Hamburg Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Gerhard Gebauer

Authors
  1. Gerhard Gebauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Gebauer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

G. Gebauer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gebauer, G. Organ- und Fertilitätserhalt beim Zervixkarzinom. Onkologie 29, 950–955 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-023-01388-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-023-01388-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation