Skip to main content
Log in

Bedeutung der Screeningkoloskopie und endoskopischer Verfahren zur Prävention und Therapie beim Kolonkarzinom

Importance of screening colonoscopy and endoscopic procedures in the prevention and treatment of colon cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Karzinomerkrankungen des Kolons und Rektums stellen eine der häufigsten geschlechtsübergreifenden bösartigen Neubildungen des Menschen in der westlichen Welt dar. Die Ursachen hierfür sind vielfältig und liegen neben der steigenden Lebenserwartung zu einem großen Teil im westlichen Lebens- und Ernährungsstil begründet. Es ist jedoch gelungen, in den letzten Jahren die Anzahl der Neuerkrankungen dieser Karzinomerkrankung deutlich zu senken. Einen zentralen Auslöser in dieser Entwicklung stellt das Vorsorgeprogramm dar, welches seit 2002 implementiert ist und neben einer Karzinomfrüherkennung auch die effektive Beseitigung von präkanzerogenen Läsionen im Darm erlaubt. Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Übersicht werden neue Entwicklungen und organisatorische Grundlagen des endoskopischen Screenings für bösartige Neubildungen des Kolorektums dargestellt. Darüber hinaus werden innovative endoskopische Möglichkeiten im Screening sowie der Therapie präneoplastischer und frühmaligner Läsionen hinsichtlich ihrer diagnostischen Wertigkeit und therapeutischen Effektivität bewertet. Das Vorsorgeprogramm zur Früherkennung und Vermeidung von kolorektalen Karzinomerkrankungen und die dabei entwickelten endoskopischen Technologien stellen einen Meilenstein in der Prävention des kolorektalen Karzinoms dar.

Abstract

Carcinoma of the colon and rectum is one of the most frequent gender-independent neoplasias in the western world. The causes of this are manifold and, in addition to our increasing life expectancy, are largely due to our western lifestyle and nutritional habits. However, in recent years we have succeeded in significantly reducing the number of new cases of this type of cancer. A central driver of this development is the tumor prevention program, which was implemented in 2002 and allows not only early detection of carcinoma but also the effective removal of precancerous lesions in the intestine. In this article, we discuss new developments and organizational implementation of endoscopic screening for malignant neoplasms of the colorectum. In addition, innovative endoscopic options in screening and treatment of precancerous and early malignant lesions are evaluated with respect to their diagnostic value and therapeutic effectiveness. The screening program for early detection and prevention of colorectal carcinoma and the endoscopic technologies developed around this program represent a milestone in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N et al (2015) ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 81:502.e1–502.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldacchini F, Bucchi L, Giuliani O et al (2020) Results of compliant participation in five rounds of fecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baran B, Mert Ozupek N, Yerli Tetik N et al (2018) Difference between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer: a focused review of literature. Gastroenterology Res 11:264–273. https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1062w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bardou M, Barkun A, Martel M (2010) Effect of statin therapy on colorectal cancer. Gut 59:1572–1585. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.190900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjelakovic G, Nagorni A, Nikolova D et al (2006) Meta-analysis: antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention of colorectal adenoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24:281–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02970.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Kretschmann J et al (2015) Trends in adenoma detection rates during the first 10 years of the German screening colonoscopy program. Gastroenterology 149:356–366.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al (2006) Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut 55:1145–1150. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.087130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan AT, Arber N, Burn J et al (2012) Aspirin in the chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia: an overview. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A et al (2011) Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21:1747–1763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2104-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fadelu T, Niedzwiecki D, Zhang S et al (2017) Nut consumption and survival in stage III colon cancer patients: results from CALGB 89803 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 35:3517–3517. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Floer M, Meister T (2016) Endoscopic improvement of the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy – Where do we stand in 2015? Digestion 93:202–213. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert Koch Institute, Association of Population-based Cancer Registries in Germany (2020) Colon and rectum. In: Robert Koch Institute, Association of Population-based Cancer Registries in Germany (Hrsg) Cancer in Germany in 2015/2016, 12. Aufl. RKI, Berlin, S 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y et al (2012) Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 143:599–607.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY et al (2002) Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 346:1781–1785. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200206063462304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirkegaard H, Johnsen NF, Christensen J et al (2010) Association of adherence to lifestyle recommendations and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective Danish cohort study. BMJ 341:c5504–c5504. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Knoop RF, Wedi E, Petzold G et al (2020) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with an additional working channel (ESD+): a novel technique to improve procedure time and safety of ESD. Surg Endosc 49:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07808-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko CW, Doria-Rose VP, Barrett MJ et al (2019) Screening colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer incidence: a case-control study. PLoS ONE 14:e226027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Jeon JY, Meyerhardt JA (2015) Diet and lifestyle in survivors of colorectal cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 29:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2014.09.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Montminy EM, Jang A, Conner M, Karlitz JJ (2020) Screening for colorectal cancer. Med Clin North Am 104:1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF et al (2015) Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 64:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pox CP, Altenhofen L, Brenner H et al (2012) Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 142:1460–1467.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.03.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pox CP, Schmiegel W (2010) Role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening: risks and benefits. Gut 59:692–700. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.183046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L et al (2012) Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 366:697–706. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1108895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reumkens A, Rondagh EJA, Bakker CM et al (2016) Post-colonoscopy complications: a systematic review, time trends, and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Am J Gastroenterol 111:1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riens B, Schäfer M, Altenhofen L (2011) Teilnahmeraten zur Beratung über Darmkrebs und zur Früherkennung im regionalen Vergleich. Zentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schäfer M, Altenhofen L, Graf von Stillfried D (2012) Teilnahmeraten stagnieren – mehr Information erforderlich. Dtsch Arztebl 109:A528–A530

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt A, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C et al (2015) Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum with a novel over-the-scope device: first experience. Endoscopy 47:719–725. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt A, Damm M, Caca K (2014) Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel over-the-scope device. Gastroenterology 147:740–742.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmiegel W, Buchberger B, Follmann M et al (2017) S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom. Z Gastroenterol 55:1344–1498. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmiegel W, Pox C, Kroesen A (2004) Ulcerative colitis. Cancer prevention. Z Gastroenterol 42:1014–1018. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-813513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M et al (2011) Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 74:581–589.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE et al (1987) Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93:1009–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(87)90563-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Terrasse V (2018) Latest global cancer data: cancer burden rises to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thanikachalam K, Khan G (2019) Colorectal cancer and nutrition. Nutrients 11:164. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11010164

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsuda S, Veress B, Tóth E, Fork F‑T (2002) Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51:550–555. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.51.4.550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. van Roon AHC, Goede SL, van Ballegooijen M et al (2013) Random comparison of repeated faecal immunochemical testing at different intervals for population-based colorectal cancer screening. Gut 62:409–415. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang P, Xiao X, Glissen Brown JR et al (2018) Development and validation of a deep-learning algorithm for the detection of polyps during colonoscopy. Nat Biomed Eng 2:741–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0301-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale. Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124:544–560. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Wir danken Dr. U. König für die kritische Bearbeitung des vorliegenden Manuskripts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Ellenrieder.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. König, M. Brunner und V. Ellenrieder geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

König, A., Brunner, M. & Ellenrieder, V. Bedeutung der Screeningkoloskopie und endoskopischer Verfahren zur Prävention und Therapie beim Kolonkarzinom. Onkologe 27, 219–226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-020-00888-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-020-00888-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation