Skip to main content
Log in

Lokale Therapie des Nierenzellkarzinoms

Local treatment of renal cell carcinoma

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Ziel der Arbeit ist es, eine Übersicht über den aktuellen Stand in der lokalen Therapie des lokalisierten Nierenzellkarzinom zu geben.

Material und Methoden

Es wurden die aktuelle Literatur sowie die Leitlinien in der Behandlung des Nierenzellkarzinoms analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Goldstandard beim lokalisierten Nierenzellkarzinom ist die operative Resektion des Tumors im Gesunden. Die organerhaltende Nierenteilresektion sollte im klinischen Stadium T1/T2 angestrebt werden, wenn diese technisch möglich ist. Der Eingriff kann bei entsprechender Expertise des Operateurs minimalinvasiv erfolgen. Die Tumornephrektomie sollte minimalinvasiv angestrebt werden, um die postoperative Morbidität zu senken. Bei Patienten mit kleinen Nierenzellkarzinomen (<4 cm) kann bei hohen Komorbiditäten oder eingeschränkter Lebenserwartung ein ablative Therapie (Radiofrequenzablation, Kryoablation) oder eine aktive Überwachung angeboten werden. Eine Biopsie ist in diesem Fall empfohlen. Für multimodale Therapiestrategien (neoadjuvant, adjuvant) gibt es aktuell keine entsprechenden Daten.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Therapie des lokalisierten Nierenzellkarzinoms umfasst die Resektion des Tumors im Gesunden mit möglichst geringer Morbidität. Aktive Überwachung oder ablative Therapieoptionen kommen bei selektionierten Patienten in Betracht.

Abstract

Objektive

The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the current status in the local treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma.

Material and methods

The current literature as well as guidelines on the treatment of renal cell carcinoma were analyzed.

Results

The gold standard in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma is the complete resection of the tumor. Organ-preserving resection should be performed in clinical stage I/II if technically feasible. Minimally invasive surgery can be performed with appropriate expertise of the surgeon. Tumor nephrectomy should be minimally invasive in order to reduce postoperative morbidity. In patients with a small renal cell carcinoma (<4 cm), ablative therapy (radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation) or active surveillance may be offered in cases of high comorbidities or reduced life expectancy. A biopsy is recommended in this case. There is currently no evidence for multimodal treatment strategies (neoadjuvant, adjuvant).

Conclusion

Treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma involves complete resection of the tumor with morbidity as low as possible. Active surveillance or ablative therapy strategies may be considered for selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aaron M, Gill IS (2007) Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours. Part II probe ablative therapy. Eur Urol 51:348–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blom JH, van Poppel H, Marechal JM et al (2009) Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol 55:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler BP, Novick AC, Miller DP et al (1995) Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron sparing surgery. J Urol 145:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Al Hanlon et al (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175:425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK et al (2015) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67:891–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fergany AF, Saad IR, Woo IL et al (2006) Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases. J Urol 175:1630–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS et al (2005) Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: part I, indications, results and role in patient management over a 6-year period and ablation of 100 tumors. Am J Roentgenol 185:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM et al (2003) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 170:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill IS, Remer EM, Hasan WA et al (2005) Renal cryoablation: outcome after 3 years. J Urol 173:1903–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haas NB, Manola J, Dutcher JP et al (2017) Adjuvant treatment for high-risk clear cell renal cancer: updated results of a high-risk subset of the ASSURE randomized trial. JAMA Oncol 3:1249–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177:862–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM et al (2006) Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7:735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kunath F, Schmidt S, Krabbe LM et al (2017) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012045.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kunkle DA, Uzzo RG (2008) Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: a meta-analysis. Cancer 113:2671–2680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lane BR, Abouassaly R, Gao T et al (2010) Active treatment of localized renal tumors may not impact overall survival in patients aged 75 years or older. Cancer 116:3119–3126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF) Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Nierenzellkarzinoms, Langversion 1.2, 2017, AWMF Registernummer: 043/017OL. http://leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/Nierenzellkarzinom.85.0.html. Zugegriffen: 2019

  17. Lerner SE, Hawkins CA, Blute ML et al (1996) Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. J Urol 155:1868–1873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V et al (2013) A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 31:924–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F et al (2017) Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35:3916–3923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Motzer RJ, Ravaud A, Patard JJ et al (2018) Adjuvant sunitinib for high-risk renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: subgroup analyses and updated overall survival results. Eur Urol 73:62–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pierorazio PM, Johnson MH, Ball MW et al (2015) Five-year analysis of a multi-institutional prospective clinical trial of delayed intervention and surveillance for small renal masses: the DISSRM registry. Eur Urol 68:408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pahernik S, Gillitzer R, Thüroff JW (2004) Cone/wedge resection of renal cell carcinoma. In Surgery Illustrated. BJU Int 93:639–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E et al (2016) Comparison of 1800 Robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23:4277–4283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Andersen W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Siva S, Pham D, Gill I et al (2012) A systematic review of stereotactic radiotherapy ablation for primary renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 110:E737–E743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W et al (2007) A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 51:1606–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Whitson JM, Harris CR, Meng MV et al (2012) Populations-based comparative effectiveness of nephron-sparing surgery vs. Ablation for small renal masses. BJU Int 110:1436–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolff I, May M, Hoschke B et al (2016) Do we need new high-risk criteria for surgically treated renal cancer patients to improve the outcome of future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting? Results of a comprehensive analysis based on the multicenter CORONA database. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:744–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Pahernik.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

F. Distler und S. Pahernik geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Distler, F., Pahernik, S. Lokale Therapie des Nierenzellkarzinoms. Onkologe 25, 512–516 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-019-0595-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-019-0595-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation