Skip to main content
Log in

Die Rolle der Chirurgie bei Gliomen

The role of surgery in gliomas

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

In der neuroonkologischen Behandlung dient die Operation der Gewinnung von Gewebe für die Charakterisierung der Tumoren und der Verbesserung der Lebensqualität und Überlebenszeit.

Fragestellung

Welche Rolle spielen der Resektionszeitpunkt und das Resektionsausmaß für die Überlebenszeit und Lebensqualität und welche intraoperativen technischen Hilfsmittel stehen zur Verfügung, um diese Ziele zu erreichen.

Material und Methode

Es erfolgte eine Zusammenstellung und Diskussion von klinischen Arbeiten und Expertenmeinungen.

Ergebnisse

Die Überlebenszeit ist sowohl bei niedriggradigen als auch bei hochgradigen Gliomen abhängig vom Resektionsausmaß. Die Mehrzahl der Experten geht von Schwellenwerten des Resektionsausmaßes aus (70 % bis Komplettresektion), die erreicht werden müssen, um einen signifikanten Benefit auszuüben. Demgegenüber stehen neuere Daten, die das Konzept eines kontinuierlichen Zusammenhangs zwischen Resektionsausmaß und Überleben vorschlagen. Anderseits beeinträchtigen postoperative Defizite die Lebensqualität und wirken sich ungünstig auf die Überlebenszeit aus. Um das Resektionsausmaß zu maximieren und gleichzeitig neue neurologische Ausfälle zu vermeiden, haben sich intraoperative Techniken wie Neuronavigation, MRT, Ultraschall, fluoreszenzgestützte Chirurgie und elektrophysiologische Ableitungen etabliert. Patienten mit niedriggradigen Gliomen profitieren ebenso wie Patienten mit höhergradigen Gliomen von einer frühzeitigen Resektion.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die vorliegenden Daten sprechen unseres Erachtens für eine frühzeitige maximal sichere Resektion von hirneigenen Tumoren. Hierzu sollten alle zur Verfügung stehenden intraoperativen Hilfsmittel an den Hirntumorzentren etabliert und ausgeschöpft werden.

Abstract

Background

In neuro-oncological treatment surgery serves to obtain tissue for the characterization of tumors and to improve the quality of life and survival time.

Objective

What role does the time and extent of resection play in survival time and quality of life and what intraoperative techniques are available to achieve these goals.

Material and methods

Compilation and discussion of clinical studies and expert opinions.

Results

The survival time of both low and high-grade gliomas depends on the extent of resection. The majority of experts assume thresholds for the extent of resection (70% up to complete resection) to be achieved in order to exert a significant effect on survival. On the other hand, more recent data suggest the concept of a continuous relationship between the extent of resection and survival; however, postoperative deficits impair the quality of life and have an unfavorable effect on the survival time. Intraoperative techniques, such as neuronavigation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, fluorescence-guided surgery and electrophysiology have been established in order to maximize the extent of resection and at the same time avoid new neurological deficits. Patients with low-grade gliomas as well as high-grade gliomas benefit from early resection.

Conclusion

In our opinion, the available data speak for an early, maximally safe resection of brain tumors. For this purpose, all available intraoperative aids should be established and used at brain tumor centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Aoki K, Nakamura H, Suzuki H et al (2017) Prognostic relevance of genetic alterations in diffuse lower-grade gliomas. Neuro-oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox132

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Breitkopf M, Bisdas S, Liebsch M et al (2017) Safety, utility, and clinical results of continuous Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring in 1.5T iMRI-guided surgery. World Neurosurg 106:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2015) Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med 372:2481–2498. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1402121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schäfer S, Schramm J (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaichana KL, Jusue-Torres I, Navarro-Ramirez R et al (2013) Establishing percent resection and residual volume thresholds affecting survival and recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed intracranial glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology 16:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Coburger J, Merkel A, Scherer M et al (2016) Low-grade glioma surgery in Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: results of a Multicenter retrospective assessment of the German study group for Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 78:775–786. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Witt Hamer PC, Robles SG, Zwinderman AH et al (2012) Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 30:2559–2565. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.4818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabowski MM, Recinos PF, Nowacki AS et al (2014) Residual tumor volume versus extent of resection: predictors of survival after surgery for glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 121:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS132449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakola AS, Gulati S, Weber C et al (2011) Postoperative deterioration in health related quality of life as predictor for survival in patients with glioblastoma: a prospective study. PLoS ONE 6:e28592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jakola AS, Myrmel KS, Kloster R et al (2012) Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. JAMA 308:1881–1888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.12807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS et al (2017) Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol 28:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreth FW, Thon N, Simon M et al (2013) Gross total but not incomplete resection of glioblastoma prolongs survival in the era of radiochemotherapy. Ann Oncol 24:3117–3123. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krieg SM, Shiban E, Droese D et al (2012) Predictive value and safety of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with motor evoked potentials in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 70:1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823f5ade (discussion 1070–1)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kubben PL, ter Meulen KJ, Schijns OEMG et al (2011) Intraoperative MRI-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 12:1062–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70130-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Roux PD, Berger MS, Wang K et al (1992) Low grade gliomas: comparison of intraoperative ultrasound characteristics with preoperative imaging studies. J Neurooncol 13:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marko NF, Weil RJ, Schroeder JL et al (2014) Extent of resection of glioblastoma revisited: personalized survival modeling facilitates more accurate survival prediction and supports a maximum-safe-resection approach to surgery. J Clin Oncol 32:774–782. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.51.8886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J et al (2015) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008–2012. Neuro-oncology 17:iv1–iv62. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov189

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Reuss DE, Kratz A, Sahm F et al (2015) Adult IDH wild type astrocytomas biologically and clinically resolve into other tumor entities. Acta Neuropathol:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1454-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Roder C, Bisdas S, Ebner FH et al (2014) Maximizing the extent of resection and survival benefit of patients in glioblastoma surgery: high-field iMRI versus conventional and 5‑ALA-assisted surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS (2008) Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 358:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanai N, Polley M‑Y, McDermott MW et al (2011) An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas. J Neurosurg 115:3–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.JNS10998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Senft C et al (2011) Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 12:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70196-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schupper AJ, Hirshman BR, Carroll KT, Ali MA, Carter BS, Chen CC (2017) Effect of gross total resection in world health organization grade II Astrocytomas: SEER-based survival analysis. World Neurosurg 103:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR et al (2008) Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol 26:1338–1345. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5‑aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5‑year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Szelényi A, Senft C, Jardan M et al (2011) Intra-operative subcortical electrical stimulation: a comparison of two methods. J Clin Neurophysiol 122:1470–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tilghman J, Wu H, Sang Y et al (2014) HMMR maintains the stemness and tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cancer Res 74:3168–3179. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Tatagiba.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Skardelly und M. Tatagiba geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skardelly, M., Tatagiba, M. Die Rolle der Chirurgie bei Gliomen. Onkologe 25, 37–44 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-018-0502-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-018-0502-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation