Skip to main content
Log in

Stereotaktische Strahlentherapie im Stadium I des nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinoms

Stereotactic radiotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die stereotaktische Strahlentherapie des nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinoms im Stadium I (SBRT) hat sich als Standardbehandlung für funktionell inoperable Patienten durchgesetzt. Mit hohen lokalen Kontrollraten von regelmäßig annähernd 90 % und einem hohen krankheitsspezifischen (aktuarischen) Überleben nach 5 Jahren von etwa 75 % wurde mit der SBRT als nichtinvasiver Behandlung ein erheblicher Fortschritt erzielt. Ihre Anwendung ist mittlerweile flächendeckend etabliert, stellt jedoch hohe Ansprüche an die technisch-apparative Ausstattung und Qualitätssicherung in den einzelnen Zentren. Die Wahl entsprechender Fraktionierungsschemata hängt dabei insbesondere von der Unterscheidung zwischen zentraler und peripherer Tumorlokalisation ab. Mit entsprechend angepassten Dosisregimen ist die Behandlungsverträglichkeit insgesamt sehr gut. Bezüglich der postinterventionellen Morbidität und Mortalität ist die SBRT sublobären Resektionen bei Patienten mit fortgeschrittener COPD (Chronic Occlusive Pulmonary Disease, GOLD III oder IV) überlegen. Für das operable Stadium I zeigte sich in kleineren Kollektiven (insbesondere auch in der Auswertung von zwei abgebrochenen prospektiv-randomisierten Studien), dass die Behandlungsergebnisse der SBRT bei entsprechend limitierter klinischer Evidenz an jene von leitliniengerecht (lobär) resezierten Patienten heranreichen. Aussichtsreiche laufende klinische Studien prüfen u. a. die SBRT als Boost nach Radiochemotherapie im Stadium III sowie die Kombination von SBRT und immuntherapeutischen Ansätzen im Stadium I.

Abstract

For patients with inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has evolved as the standard of care. As a non-invasive method, SBRT has led to a significant progress with high local control rates regularly amounting to nearly 90% and a high disease-specific (actuarial) survival after 5 years of approximately 75%. The application of SBRT has now been widely adopted in many radiation units; however, its use places high demands on the technical apparative equipment and a sophisticated quality assurance in the individual centers. The choice of appropriate fractionation schemes depends primarily on the distinction between a central and a peripheral tumor location. With appropriately adjusted dose regimens very good treatment tolerance can be achieved. In comparison to sublobar resection for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, GOLD III or IV), SBRT is superior in terms of post-interventional morbidity and mortality. For the operable stage I the results of SBRT treatment in small collectives are as effective as those of patients who received a guideline-conform lobar resection. This is the conclusion of the analysis of two prospective randomized trials, which were terminated early; however, clinical evidence is still limited in this context. Promising currently running clinical trials are examining the application of SBRT as a boost after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC and also the combination of SBRT and immunotherapeutic approaches in stage I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Adebahr S, Collette S, Shash E et al (2015) LungTech, an EORTC Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours: a clinical perspective. Br J Radiol 88:20150036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D et al (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37:4078–4101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang JY, Senan S, Marinus JP et al (2015) Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 16:630–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corradetti MN, Haas AR, Rengan R (2012) Central-airway necrosis after stereotactic body-radiation therapy. N Engl J Med 366:2327–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crabtree TC, Denlinger CE, Meyers BF (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgical resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Creach KM, El Naqa I, Bradley JD et al (2012) Dosimetric predictors of chest wall pain after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 104:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Nestle U et al (2010) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:5301–5310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dzierma Y, Nuesken FG, Fleckenstein J et al (2013) Visualisation of respiratory tumour motion and co-moving isodose lines in the context of respiratory gating, IMRT and flattening-filter-free beams. PLoS ONE 8:e53799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernando HC, Landreneau RJ, Mandrekar SJ et al (2014) Impact of brachytherapy on local recurrence rates after sublobar resection: results from ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance), a phase III randomized trial for high-risk operable non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:2456–2462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grills IS, Mangona VS, Welsh R et al (2010) Outcomes after stereotactic lung radiotherapy or wedge resection for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:928–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grills IS, Hope AJ, Guckenberger M (2012) A collaborative analysis of stereotactic lung radiotherapy outcomes for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer using daily online cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 7:1382–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Alheit H et al (2014) Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Principles and practice for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 190:26–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guckenberger M (2017) Stereotaktische Strahlentherapie bei Lungenkrebs im Stadium I – gibt es eine Evidenz? Zentralbl Chir 142:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haasbeek CJA, Lagerwaard FJ, Slotman BJ et al (2011) Outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for centrally located early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6:2036–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y et al (2007) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study. J Thorac Oncol 2(Suppl 3):S94–S100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y et al (2011) Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: can SBRT be comparable to surgery? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:1352–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palma D, Lagerwaard F, Rodrigues G et al (2012) Curative treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with severe COPD: stereotactic radiotherapy outcomes and systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:1149–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Port JL, Parashar B, Osakwe N et al (2014) A propensity-matched analysis of wedge resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1152–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell JW, Dexter E, Scalzetti EM et al (2009) Treatment advances for medically inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: emphasis on prospective trials. Lancet Oncol 10:885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Crowley J (2015) The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 10:990–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raz DJ, Zell JA, Ou SI et al (2007) Natural history of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 132:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stahl JM, Ross R, Harder EM et al (2016) The effect of biologically effective dose and radiation treatment schedule on overall survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:1011–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yannoutsos C et al (2006) Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4833–4839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang J, Yang F, Li B et al (2011) Which is the optimal biologically effective dose of stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:e305–e316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF) (2018) Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms, Langversion 1.0. http://leitlinienprogramm-on-kologie.de/Lungenkarzinom.98.0.html (AWMF-Registernummer: 020/007OL). Zugegriffen: 03.08.2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Fleckenstein.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Fleckenstein und C. Rübe geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fleckenstein, J., Rübe, C. Stereotaktische Strahlentherapie im Stadium I des nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinoms. Onkologe 24, 967–973 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-018-0458-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-018-0458-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation